Psychoacoustic features explain creakiness classifications made by naive and non-naive listeners

[1]  Julián Villegas,et al.  Prediction of Creaky Speech by Recurrent Neural Networks Using Psychoacoustic Roughness , 2020, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[2]  Mingnan Liu,et al.  Interviewer Gender Effect on Acquiescent Response Style in 11 Asian Countries and Societies , 2016 .

[3]  John Kane,et al.  Data-driven detection and analysis of the patterns of creaky voice , 2014, Comput. Speech Lang..

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[5]  Robin A. Samlan,et al.  Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception , 2014, Loquens.

[6]  John Kane,et al.  Improved automatic detection of creak , 2013, Comput. Speech Lang..

[7]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[8]  James P. Kirby.  Vietnamese (Hanoi Vietnamese) , 2011, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[9]  Peter B. Smith.  Communication Styles as Dimensions of National Culture , 2011 .

[10]  Marc Brunelle,et al.  Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[11]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  A Method for Automatic Detection of Vocal Fry , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[12]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research , 2006 .

[13]  S McAdams,et al.  Two phase effects in roughness perception. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. B. Newman,et al.  A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch , 1937 .