Signatures and control of strong-field dynamics in a complex system

Significance Using intense lasers to control complex molecules is a long-held dream in science. In this article, we develop a physics concept for measuring and controlling the quantum states of complex molecules by strong laser fields. We show that, in particular, the quantum-mechanical phase of excited molecular states can be manipulated by the intense laser, a key quantity for full (amplitude and phase) control of molecular quantum states. With the help of time- and intensity-resolved absorption spectroscopy experiments, we apply this idea to the dynamics of a large dye molecule in solution. The demonstrated phase-control concept thus represents a major leap toward the ultimate goal of laser chemistry. Controlling chemical reactions by light, i.e., the selective making and breaking of chemical bonds in a desired way with strong-field lasers, is a long-held dream in science. An essential step toward achieving this goal is to understand the interactions of atomic and molecular systems with intense laser light. The main focus of experiments that were performed thus far was on quantum-state population changes. Phase-shaped laser pulses were used to control the population of final states, also, by making use of quantum interference of different pathways. However, the quantum-mechanical phase of these final states, governing the system’s response and thus the subsequent temporal evolution and dynamics of the system, was not systematically analyzed. Here, we demonstrate a generalized phase-control concept for complex systems in the liquid phase. In this scheme, the intensity of a control laser pulse acts as a control knob to manipulate the quantum-mechanical phase evolution of excited states. This control manifests itself in the phase of the molecule’s dipole response accessible via its absorption spectrum. As reported here, the shape of a broad molecular absorption band is significantly modified for laser pulse intensities ranging from the weak perturbative to the strong-field regime. This generalized phase-control concept provides a powerful tool to interpret and understand the strong-field dynamics and control of large molecules in external pulsed laser fields.

[1]  C. Consani,et al.  Quantum control spectroscopy of competing reaction pathways in a molecular switch. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[2]  Marcus Motzkus,et al.  Time-resolved two color single-beam CARS employing supercontinuum and femtosecond pulse shaping , 2006 .

[3]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Femtosecond quantum control of molecular bond formation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  James J. Valentini,et al.  Chapter 1 – Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Spectroscopy* , 1985 .

[5]  T. Mančal,et al.  Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems , 2007, Nature.

[6]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future , 2009, 0912.5121.

[7]  H Rabitz,et al.  Selective Bond Dissociation and Rearrangement with Optimally Tailored, Strong-Field Laser Pulses , 2001, Science.

[8]  Sheehy,et al.  Precision measurement of strong field double ionization of helium. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[9]  P. Bucksbaum,et al.  Toward strong field mode-selective chemistry , 1999 .

[10]  Yaron Silberberg,et al.  Single-pulse coherently controlled nonlinear Raman spectroscopy and microscopy , 2002, Nature.

[11]  P. Bucksbaum,et al.  Controlling the shape of a quantum wavefunction , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Ahmed H. Zewail Prof. Femtochemistry: Atomic-Scale Dynamics of the Chemical Bond Using Ultrafast Lasers (Nobel Lecture) , 2000 .

[13]  T. Baumert,et al.  Ultrafast laser control of electron dynamics in atoms, molecules and solids. , 2011, Faraday discussions.

[14]  R. Mathies,et al.  Structural Observation of the Primary Isomerization in Vision with Femtosecond-Stimulated Raman , 2005, Science.

[15]  Kevin F. Lee,et al.  Suppression of perturbed free-induction decay and noise in experimental ultrafast pump-probe data. , 2009, Optics letters.

[16]  Graham R. Fleming,et al.  Two-dimensional spectroscopy of electronic couplings in photosynthesis , 2005, Nature.

[17]  U. Keller,et al.  Recent attoclock measurements of strong field ionization , 2013 .

[18]  Richard A Mathies,et al.  Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy. , 2007, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[19]  Graham R. Fleming,et al.  Third-order nonlinear time domain probes of solvation dynamics , 1996 .

[20]  Kompa,et al.  Whither the future of controlling quantum phenomena? , 2000, Science.

[21]  S. Boxer,et al.  Stark spectroscopy: applications in chemistry, biology, and materials science. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[22]  I. Sola,et al.  Control of ultrafast molecular photodissociation by laser-field-induced potentials. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[23]  Yaron Silberberg,et al.  Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse , 1998, Nature.

[24]  I. Christov,et al.  Shaped-pulse optimization of coherent emission of high-harmonic soft X-rays , 2000, Nature.

[25]  F. Martín,et al.  Reconstruction and control of a time-dependent two-electron wave packet , 2014, Nature.

[26]  Dieter Bauer,et al.  Above-threshold ionization by few-cycle pulses , 2006 .

[27]  Jürgen Popp,et al.  Raman spectroscopy at the beginning of the twenty-first century , 2006 .

[28]  M. Motzkus,et al.  Control of excited-state population and vibrational coherence with shaped-resonant and near-resonant excitation , 2008 .

[29]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Quantum Control of Molecular Processes , 2012 .

[30]  S. Boxer,et al.  Charge transfer in photoacids observed by stark spectroscopy. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[31]  Marcos Dantus,et al.  Multiphoton Intrapulse Interference. 1. Control of Multiphoton Processes in Condensed Phases , 2002 .

[32]  C. Keitel,et al.  Lorentz Meets Fano in Spectral Line Shapes: A Universal Phase and Its Laser Control , 2013, Science.

[33]  T. Baumert,et al.  Efficient and robust strong-field control of population transfer in sensitizer dyes with designed femtosecond laser pulses. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  G. Fleming,et al.  Three-Pulse Echo Peak Shift Studies of Polar Solvation Dynamics , 1997 .

[35]  Gerber,et al.  Control of chemical reactions by feedback-optimized phase-shaped femtosecond laser pulses , 1998, Science.

[36]  James M. Schleicher,et al.  Dynamic-Absorption Spectral Contours: Vibrational Phase-Dependent Resolution of Low-Frequency Coherent Wave-Packet Motion of IR144 on the Ground-State and Excited-State π → π* Surfaces , 2004 .

[37]  D. Bucknall,et al.  Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback-Optimized Phase-Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses , 1998 .

[38]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Quantum control of tightly competitive product channels. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[39]  Gustav Gerber,et al.  Femtosecond quantum control of molecular dynamics in the condensed phase. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[40]  G. Gerber,et al.  Photoselective adaptive femtosecond quantum control in the liquid phase , 2001, Nature.

[41]  S. Boxer,et al.  Stark effect spectroscopy of tryptophan. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[42]  M. Joffre,et al.  Coherent effects in pump-probe spectroscopy of excitons. , 1988, Optics letters.

[43]  B. Sussman,et al.  Dynamic Stark Control of Photochemical Processes , 2006, Science.

[44]  Y. Silberberg,et al.  Simple route to strong-field coherent control. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[45]  F. Krausz Attosecond Physics , 2007, 2007 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics - Pacific Rim.

[46]  Aleksei M. Zheltikov,et al.  Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering: from proof-of-the-principle experiments to femtosecond CARS and higher order wave-mixing generalizations , 2000 .

[47]  P. Brumer,et al.  Theory of perturbative pulse train based coherent control. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[48]  Marcus Motzkus,et al.  Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting , 2002, Nature.

[49]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Quantum Control of Molecular Processes: SHAPIRO:QUANTUM CONTR. E2 O-BK , 2011 .

[50]  K. Nelson,et al.  Selective enhancements in 2D Fourier transform optical spectroscopy with tailored pulse shapes. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[51]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Optimal control of ground-state dynamics in polymers , 2002 .