Nanomachine-to-Neuron Communication Interfaces for Neuronal Stimulation at Nanoscale

The recent advancements in nanotechnology have been instrumental in initiating research and development of intelligent nanomachines, in a variety of different application domains including healthcare. The stimulation of the cerebral cortex to assist the treatment of brain diseases have been investigated with growing interest in the past, where nanotechnology offers a dramatic breakthrough. In this paper, we discuss the feasibility of a nanomachine-to-neuron interface to design a nanoscale stimulator device called synaptic nanomachine (SnM), compatible with the neuronal communication paradigm. An equivalent neuron-nanomachine model (EqNN) is proposed to describe the behavior of neurons excited by a network of SnMs. Sample populations of neurons are simulated under different stimulation scenarios. The assessment of the existing correlation between SnM stimulus and response, as well as between neurons and clusters of neurons, has been performed using statistical methods. The obtained results reveal that a controlled nanoscale stimulation induces apparently an oscillatory behavior in the neuronal activity and localized synchronization between neurons. Both effects are expected to have the basis of important cognitive and behavioral functions such as learning and brain plasticity.

[1]  Caofeng Pan,et al.  Generating Electricity from Biofluid with a Nanowire‐Based Biofuel Cell for Self‐Powered Nanodevices , 2010, Advanced materials.

[2]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Mobile Ad Hoc Nanonetworks with Collision-Based Molecular Communication , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of a recurrent network of spiking neurons before and following learning , 1997 .

[4]  K. Blackwell,et al.  Gap Junctions between Striatal Fast-Spiking Interneurons Regulate Spiking Activity and Synchronization as a Function of Cortical Activity , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .

[6]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models , 2002 .

[8]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Fast Global Oscillations in Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons with Low Firing Rates , 1999, Neural Computation.

[9]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  On the modeling and analysis of the RF exposure on biological systems: A potential treatment strategy for neurodegenerative diseases , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[10]  M. Quirk,et al.  Construction and analysis of non-Poisson stimulus-response models of neural spiking activity , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Information-Theoretic Analysis of Neural Coding , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Time structure of the activity in neural network models. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  L. Gammaitoni,et al.  Nonlinear energy harvesting. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[14]  Robert E Kass,et al.  Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Novel treatment strategies for neurodegenerative diseases based on RF exposure , 2011, ISABEL '11.

[16]  Michael Rudolph,et al.  Note on “ Characterization of subthreshold voltage fluctuations in neuronal membranes ” , 2008 .

[17]  E. Avignone,et al.  Gap junctions and connexin expression in the normal and pathological central nervous system , 2002, Biology of the cell.

[18]  Helen J. Cross,et al.  A Possible Role for Gap Junctions in Generation of Very Fast EEG Oscillations Preceding the Onset of, and Perhaps Initiating, Seizures , 2001, Epilepsia.

[19]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Self-powered system with wireless data transmission. , 2011, Nano letters.

[20]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  E. Isacoff,et al.  Optical switches and triggers for the manipulation of ion channels and pores. , 2007, Molecular bioSystems.

[22]  R. Wennberg,et al.  A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Molecular motors: Fuelling movement at the nanoscale. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[24]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A physical end-to-end model for molecular communication in nanonetworks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  Gengfeng Zheng,et al.  Detection, Stimulation, and Inhibition of Neuronal Signals with High-Density Nanowire Transistor Arrays , 2006, Science.

[26]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Point process models of single-neuron discharges , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Matile,et al.  Ion channels and pores, made from scratch. , 2007, Molecular bioSystems.

[29]  Jun Tan,et al.  Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease mice. , 2010, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[30]  C. Koch,et al.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[32]  Laura Galluccio,et al.  Modeling signal propagation in nanomachine-to-neuron communications , 2011, Nano Commun. Networks.