Chasin’ choppers: using unpredictable trajectories to test theories of object interception

Three theories of the informational basis for object interception strategies were tested in an experiment where participants pursued toy helicopters. Helicopters were used as targets because their unpredictable trajectories have different effects on the optical variables that have been proposed as the basis of object interception, providing a basis for determining the variables that best explain this behavior. Participants pursued helicopters while the positions of both pursuer and helicopter were continuously monitored. Using models to predict the observed optical trajectories of the helicopter and ground positions of the pursuer, optical acceleration was eliminated as a basis of object interception. A model based on control of optical velocity (COV) provided the best match to pursuer ground movements, while one based on segments of linear optical trajectories (SLOT) provided the best match to the observed optical trajectories. We describe suggestions for further research to distinguish the COV and SLOT models.

[1]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Center-surround patterns emerge as optimal predictors for human saccade targets. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  Dennis M Shaffer,et al.  A linear optical trajectory informs the fielder where to run to the side to catch fly balls. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Visual factors in hitting and catching. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  Thomas Sugar,et al.  Robotic modeling of mobile ball-catching as a tool for understanding biological interceptive behavior , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Nick Reed,et al.  How soccer players head the ball: A test of optic acceleration cancellation theory with virtual reality , 2008, Vision Research.

[6]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[7]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Response: On Catching Fly Balls , 1996, Science.

[8]  Dennis M Shaffer,et al.  Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R. Marken,et al.  Controlled variables: psychology as the center fielder views it. , 2001, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Hitting what one wants to hit and missing what one wants to miss , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  James A. Simmons,et al.  Interception of Flying Insects by Bats , 1983 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Piotr G. Jablonski,et al.  A rare predator exploits prey escape behavior: the role of tail-fanning and plumage contrast in foraging of the painted redstart (Myioborus pictus) , 1999 .

[14]  P. McLeod,et al.  The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[17]  Seville Chapman.  Catching a Baseball , 1968 .

[18]  D. A. Grant,et al.  The pseudo-conditioned eye-lid response. , 1943 .

[19]  Dennis M Shaffer,et al.  Baseball outfielders maintain a linear optical trajectory when tracking uncatchable fly balls. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Simmons,et al.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. , 1979, Science.

[21]  Richard S Marken,et al.  Optical trajectories and the informational basis of fly ball catching. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J A Simmons,et al.  Sonar tracking of horizontally moving targets by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus. , 1985, Science.

[23]  M K Kaiser,et al.  How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. , 1995, Science.

[24]  Scott M Krauchunas,et al.  How Dogs Navigate to Catch Frisbees , 2004, Psychological science.

[25]  P. McLeod,et al.  How to Catch a Cricket Ball , 1993, Perception.

[26]  William H Warren,et al.  Catching fly balls in virtual reality: a critical test of the outfielder problem. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  Zheng Wang,et al.  A unified fielder theory for interception of moving objects either above or below the horizon , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  R. Kuc.  Sensorimotor model of bat echolocation and prey capture. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. L. Dannemiller,et al.  On Catching Fly Balls , 1996, Science.

[30]  P. McLeod,et al.  Psychophysics: How fielders arrive in time to catch the ball , 2003, Nature.

[31]  P. McLeod,et al.  Do Fielders Know Where to Go to Catch the Ball or Only How to Get There , 1996 .

[32]  N Reed,et al.  Toward a unified fielder theory: what we do not yet know about how people run to catch a ball. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.