“Tele-rounding” with a remotely controlled mobile robot in the neonatal intensive care unit

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of ‘tele-rounding’ in the neonatal intensive care. Methods: In this prospective study utilizing telemedicine technology in the NICU for daily patient bedside rounds (‘tele-rounds’), twenty pairs of neonates were matched according to gestational age, diagnoses, and disease severity. One patient was cared for by the on-site NICU team lead by an on-site neonatologist. The other patient was cared for by the on-site team but led by an off-site neonatologist using a remote-controlled robot. Patient rounding data, clinical outcomes, length of stay, and hospital costs were compared between the two groups. Parents and staff were also surveyed about their satisfaction with telemedicine. Results: Except for one parameter, no significant differences in care or outcomes were found between patients cared for by either neonatologist. The exception was the time the off-site neonatologist spent on the patient encounter compared to the on-site neonatologist (median [interquartile range]), (5 minutes [5, 6] vs. 8 minutes [7, 10.5], p = 0.002). This difference was due primarily to time needed to operate and maneuver the robot or occasionally to slower or dropped connection to the Internet. There were positive perceptions of telemedicine among both parents and NICU staff. Conclusion: As long as direct bedside care providers are available, remote-controlled, robotic telemedicine technology can be utilized by neonatologists to perform daily patient rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit.

[1]  Craig A Sable,et al.  Impact of telemedicine on the practice of pediatric cardiology in community hospitals. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[2]  R. Wootton,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of a system for neonatal teleconsultation , 2007 .

[3]  Lance Brendan Young,et al.  Impact of telemedicine intensive care unit coverage on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  I. Seri,et al.  The use of mobile robotic telemedicine technology in the neonatal intensive care unit , 2012, Journal of Perinatology.

[5]  M. Deardorff,et al.  Telemedicine for genetic and neurologic evaluation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit , 2013, Journal of Perinatology.

[6]  Anthony C. Smith,et al.  Clinicians' perceptions of telemedicine for remote neonatal consultation. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  Theodore Leng,et al.  Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): five years of screening with telemedicine. , 2014, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

[8]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Postoperative robotic telerounding: a multicenter randomized assessment of patient outcomes and satisfaction. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[9]  Stephen L. Jones,et al.  Robotic telepresence: a helpful adjunct that is viewed favorably by critically ill surgical patients. , 2011, American Journal of Surgery.

[10]  D. Sahn,et al.  Impact of telemedicine on hospital transport, length of stay, and medical outcomes in infants with suspected heart disease: a multicenter study. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  B. McCrossan,et al.  Remote diagnosis of congenital heart disease: the impact of telemedicine , 2009, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[12]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.