Steered molecular dynamics simulations of ligand–receptor interaction in lipocalins

Retinol binding protein (RBP) and an engineered lipocalin, DigA16, have been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Special emphasis has been placed on explaining the ligand–receptor interaction in RBP–retinol and DigA16–digoxigenin complexes, and steered molecular dynamics simulations of 10–20 ns have been carried out for the ligand expulsion process. Digoxigenin is bound deep inside the cavity of DigA16 and forms several stable hydrogen bonds in addition to the hydrophobic van der Waals interaction with the aromatic side-chains. Four crystalline water molecules inside the ligand-binding cavity remain trapped during the simulations. The strongly hydrophobic receptor site of RBP differs considerably from DigA16, and the main source of ligand attraction comes from the phenyl side-chains. The hydrogen bonds between digoxigenin and DigA16 cause the rupture forces on ligand removal in DigA16 and RBP to differ. The mutated DigA16 residues contribute approximately one-half of the digoxigenin interaction energy with DigA16 and, of these, the energetically most important are residues His35, Arg58, Ser87, Tyr88, and Phe114. Potential “sensor loops” were found for both receptors. These are the outlier loops between residues 114–121 and 63–67 for DigA16 and RBP, respectively, and they are located near the entrance of the ligand-binding cavity. Especially, the residues Glu119 (DigA16) and Leu64 (RBP) are critical for sensing. The ligand binding energies have been estimated based on the linear response approximation of binding affinity by using a previous parametrization for retinoids and RBP.

[1]  R. Brasseur,et al.  Ir-LBP, an Ixodes ricinus Tick Salivary LTB4-Binding Lipocalin, Interferes with Host Neutrophil Function , 2008, PloS one.

[2]  P. Kollman,et al.  Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods , 1990 .

[3]  T A Jones,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of human serum retinol binding protein at 2Å resolution , 1990, Proteins.

[4]  Y. Urade,et al.  Compact packing of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase induced by binding of lipophilic ligands. , 2008, Journal of biochemistry.

[5]  C. Jarzynski Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences , 1996, cond-mat/9610209.

[6]  P A Kollman,et al.  What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? , 1999, Proteins.

[7]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  The three‐dimensional structure of retinol‐binding protein. , 1984, The EMBO journal.

[8]  Oleg V Prezhdo,et al.  Atomistic simulation combined with analytic theory to study the response of the P-selectin/PSGL-1 complex to an external force. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  Structure of chicken plasma retinol-binding protein. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  M. Sprik,et al.  Ab initio molecular dynamics study of the reaction of water with formaldehyde in sulfuric acid solution. , 1998 .

[12]  V. Calderone,et al.  High-resolution structures of retinol-binding protein in complex with retinol: pH-induced protein structural changes in the crystal state. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Arne Skerra,et al.  Alternative binding proteins: Anticalins – harnessing the structural plasticity of the lipocalin ligand pocket to engineer novel binding activities , 2008, The FEBS journal.

[14]  A. Skerra,et al.  A novel type of receptor protein, based on the lipocalin scaffold, with specificity for digoxigenin. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Arne Skerra,et al.  Tuning ligand affinity, specificity, and folding stability of an engineered lipocalin variant -- a so-called 'anticalin' -- using a molecular random approach. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[16]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[17]  J. Åqvist,et al.  The linear interaction energy method for predicting ligand binding free energies. , 2001, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[18]  P-L Chau Water movement during ligand unbinding from receptor site. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[19]  G. Malpeli,et al.  Structure of pig plasma retinol-binding protein at 1.65 A resolution. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[20]  C. Jarzynski Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach , 1997, cond-mat/9707325.

[21]  K. Schulten,et al.  Calculating potentials of mean force from steered molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  M. Peräkylä Ligand unbinding pathways from the vitamin D receptor studied by molecular dynamics simulations , 2009, European Biophysics Journal.

[23]  A. Skerra,et al.  Comparative ligand-binding analysis of ten human lipocalins. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[25]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Binding and release of cholesterol in the Osh4 protein of yeast , 2009, Proteins.

[27]  Weiliang Zhu,et al.  Dynamic mechanism of E2020 binding to acetylcholinesterase: a steered molecular dynamics simulation. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  R L Campbell,et al.  26-10 Fab-digoxin complex: affinity and specificity due to surface complementarity. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Schildbach,et al.  Structure and specificity of the anti-digoxin antibody 40-50. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  D R Flower,et al.  The lipocalin protein family: structure and function. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[31]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics investigations of protein function. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[32]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[33]  Gaohua Liu,et al.  NMR structure and dynamics of the engineered fluorescein-binding lipocalin FluA reveal rigidification of beta-barrel and variable loops upon enthalpy-driven ligand binding. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[34]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[35]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[36]  A. Skerra Alternative non-antibody scaffolds for molecular recognition. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[37]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  Irwin Oppenheim,et al.  Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes. VII. The Coefficient of Thermal Conductivity of Monatomic Liquids , 1954 .

[39]  Michiel Sprik,et al.  Free energy from constrained molecular dynamics , 1998 .

[40]  I. Korndörfer,et al.  Structural mechanism of specific ligand recognition by a lipocalin tailored for the complexation of digoxigenin. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  U. Cogan,et al.  Binding affinities of retinol and related compounds to retinol binding proteins. , 1976, European journal of biochemistry.

[42]  Viola Vogel,et al.  How Force Might Activate Talin's Vinculin Binding Sites: SMD Reveals a Structural Mechanism , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  D. Flower The lipocalin protein family: A role in cell regulation , 1994, FEBS letters.

[44]  Arne Skerra,et al.  Lipocalins in drug discovery: from natural ligand-binding proteins to "anticalins". , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[45]  P. Kollman,et al.  An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules , 1984 .

[46]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  H. Monaco,et al.  Crystal structure of liganded and unliganded forms of bovine plasma retinol-binding protein. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[48]  P. Kaye,et al.  An engineered lipocalin specific for CTLA-4 reveals a combining site with structural and conformational features similar to antibodies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  R. Zwanzig High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .