Eective audit policy for voter-verified paper ballots
暂无分享,去创建一个
Scientists and politicians are reaching consensus that elections must be countable independently of the need to trust the computer software in a DRE voting machine or in an optical scanner. Public trust in elections requires a Voter-Verified Paper Ballot (VVPB), printed by a DRE or scanned by a scanner. But producing the VVPBs is not enough; to do any good they must also be audited. A recount of 1% of randomly selected precincts (as performed in some states) is not sucient to detect fraud with high confidence, except in statewide races. A recount of 5% would be barely adequate, but would be quite expensive. I propose a new statutory framework that will be as aordable as a 1% recount but more eective than a 5% recount. It requires a mandatory audit of 1% of precincts, and permits any candidate to demand (and pay actual costs for) an audit of up to 7 precincts. The rule of 1%+7 will give high confidence for both large and small elections.
[1] D. D. Mckean,et al. The boss : the Hague machine in action , 1941 .
[2] Tracy Campbell,et al. Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, an American Political Tradition-1742-2004 , 2005 .
[3] Micah Sherr,et al. Source Code Review of the Sequoia Voting System 1 , 2007 .
[4] J. A. Halderman. Source Code Review of the Diebold Voting System , 2007 .
[5] Ariel J. Feldman,et al. Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting Machine , 2007, EVT.