A new smartphone-based method for wound area measurement.

Proper wound healing can be assessed by monitoring the wound surface area. Its reduction by 10 or 50% should be achieved after 1 or 4 weeks, respectively, from the start of the applied therapy. There are various methods of wound area measurement, which differ in terms of the cost of the devices and their accuracy. This article presents an originally developed method for wound area measurement. It is based on the automatic recognition of the wound contour with a software application running on a smartphone. The wound boundaries have to be traced manually on transparent foil placed over the wound. After taking a picture of the wound outline over a grid of 1 × 1 cm, the AreaMe software calculates the wound area, sends the data to a clinical database using an Internet connection, and creates a graph of the wound area change over time. The accuracy and precision of the new method was assessed and compared with the accuracy and precision of commercial devices: Visitrak and SilhouetteMobile. The comparison was performed using 108 wound shapes that were measured five times with each device, using an optical scanner as a reference device. The accuracy of the new method was evaluated by calculating relative errors and comparing them with relative errors for the Visitrak and the SilhouetteMobile devices. The precision of the new method was determined by calculating the coefficients of variation and comparing them with the coefficients of variation for the Visitrak and the SilhouetteMobile devices. A statistical analysis revealed that the new method was more accurate and more precise than the Visitrak device but less accurate and less precise than the SilhouetteMobile device. Thus, the AreaMe application is a superior alternative to the Visitrak device because it provides not only a more accurate measurement of the wound area but also stores the data for future use by the physician.

[1]  Andrew Johnson,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[2]  Julie W. Anderson,et al.  Measuring Wound Length, Width, and Area: Which Technique? , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[3]  R. Salcido,et al.  Advances in Wound Photography and Assessment Methods , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[4]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Monitoring of diabetic foot syndrome treatment: some new perspectives. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[5]  M. G. Woodbury,et al.  A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement. , 2002, Ostomy/wound management.

[6]  G. Gethin,et al.  The importance of continuous wound measuring , 2006 .

[7]  Stefan Beckert,et al.  Fifty percent area reduction after 4 weeks of treatment is a reliable indicator for healing--analysis of a single-center cohort of 704 diabetic patients. , 2009, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[8]  J. Giurini,et al.  Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Area of the diabetic ulcers estimated applying a foot scanner-based home telecare system and three reference methods. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Accuracy and precision of selected wound area measurement methods in diabetic foot ulceration. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  A. Ciechanowska,et al.  A new imaging and data transmitting device for telemonitoring of diabetic foot syndrome patients. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  Benjamin Albouy,et al.  Three-Dimensional Assessment of Skin Wounds Using a Standard Digital Camera , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  P Plassmann,et al.  MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Measurement of Area and Volume Instrument System. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Marco Romanelli,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a wound measurement and documentation system. , 2008, Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice.

[15]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Comparison of the wound area assessment methods in the diabetic foot syndrome , 2010 .

[16]  Nicolas Rannou,et al.  Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[17]  Kath Bogie,et al.  Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.