Partnership, conflict and gaming

Government policy stresses partnership as a critical organizational form of the future to support the development of schooling. This article uses intergroup conflict and gaming theory to analyse data from one partnership. The views of young people and staff are explored to establish the nature and extent of conflict and its impact on the partnership. Gaming theory is used to investigate the engagement and expectations of organizations in the partnership. The article challenges Government rhetoric that suggests that as experience and trust grow, partnership will overcome the barriers which exist as a legacy from previous more competitive and isolationist cultures, to the benefit of service users. It further suggests that the availability of adequate resources alone, if ever achieved, would not in itself create the conditions for successful partnership. Far more attention is required to be given to the complex range of conditions which might support partnership and increase the possibility that the interests of learners would not be subordinated to those of organizations.

[1]  Michele G. Alexander,et al.  Theoretical, Empirical, and Practical Approaches to Intergroup Conflict , 1998 .

[2]  Managing interpersonal conflict , 1990, International Conference on Professional Communication,Communication Across the Sea: North American and European Practices.

[3]  Great Britain. Foreign Office..  Education reform bill , 1987 .

[4]  K. Tollefson.  Potlatching and Political Organization among the Northwest Coast Indians , 1995 .

[5]  K. Ohbuchi,et al.  THREE DIMENSIONS OF CONFLICT ISSUES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON RESOLUTION STRATEGIES IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS , 2003 .

[6]  Morwenna Griffiths.  Collaboration and partnership in question: knowledge, politics and practice , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation , 1994 .

[8]  W. J. Jenkins,et al.  Her Majesty's government , 1967 .

[9]  S. Ball.  The micro-politics of the school , 1987 .

[10]  Alan Felstead,et al.  Funding Post Compulsory Education and Training: A retrospective analysis of the TEC and FEFC systems and their impact on skills , 2001 .

[11]  N. Humphrey.  Varieties of altruism : And the common ground between them , 1997 .

[12]  M. Sherif,et al.  Groups in harmony and tension : an integration of studies on intergroup relations , 1954 .

[13]  ‘Parental choice’, consumption and social theory: The operation of micro‐markets in education , 1994 .

[14]  J. Lumby,et al.  Developing 14–19 education: meeting needs and improving choice , 2003 .

[15]  J. Furlong.  Re-defining partnership: revolution or reform in initial teacher education? , 1996 .

[16]  S. Billett,et al.  Politics of social partnerships: a framework for theorizing , 2004 .

[17]  Jay W. Jackson,et al.  Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. , 1993 .

[18]  Mike Tomlinson,et al.  14-19 curriculum and qualifications reform : final report of the Working Group on 14-19 Reform , 2004 .

[19]  Ron Glatter,et al.  Collaboration, collaboration, collaboration , 2003 .

[20]  H. Kennedy.  Learning works : widening participation in further education , 1997 .

[21]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Multi‐organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance , 1998 .

[22]  A. West,et al.  New Labour and School-based Education in England: Changing the system of funding? , 2000 .

[23]  G. Whitty,et al.  Specialisation and Selection in Secondary Education , 1997 .

[24]  Jeremy Higham,et al.  14-19 pathfinders: an evaluation of the first year , 2004 .

[25]  Ann R. J. Briggs.  Making a difference: the impact of leadership upon the ethos of sixth form colleges , 2003 .

[26]  J. Harvey,et al.  Control, Autonomy and Partnership in Local Education , 2004 .

[27]  Marie Brown,et al.  Holy Grail or Poisoned Chalice? A Case Study of Partnership Collaboration Between a University School of Education and a Private Sector Education Services Company , 2000 .

[28]  Harinck,et al.  The Impact of Conflict Issues on Fixed-Pie Perceptions, Problem Solving, and Integrative Outcomes in Negotiation. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[29]  S. Ball,et al.  Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage , 2003 .

[30]  J. Chandler,et al.  Local government today , 1991 .