Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: surface characterization and in vivo performance.

Etching is used for the surface modification of titanium to improve the implant performance in bone. In this study, pure titanium implants were surface modified by a cathodic reduction process by using hydrofluoric acid (HF) at various concentrations (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 vol %) and a constant current of 1 mA/cm(2). The resulting surface microtopographies were analyzed by atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and profilometry, while the surface chemical contents were evaluated by time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. The competitive forces between ionic surface implementation induced by the current direction and the HF etching effect on titanium were highlighted. The implant performance was evaluated in an in vivo rabbit model by using a pull-out test method. The group of implants modified with 0.01% HF showed the highest retention in bone. Fluoride and hydride amounts measured in the surfaces, as well as surface skewness (S(sk)), kurtosis (S(ku)), and core fluid retention (S(ci)) were positively correlated to the implant's retention in bone in vivo. Frequently used parameters for characterizing the implant, such as oxide content and the average height deviation from the mean plane (S(a)), were not correlated to implant performance, suggesting that these parameters are not the most important in predicting the implant performance.

[1]  G. A. Soares,et al.  Response of osteoblastic cells to titanium submitted to three different surface treatments. , 2005, Brazilian oral research.

[2]  R. Glauser,et al.  The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[3]  P. Trisi,et al.  A histometric comparison of smooth and rough titanium implants in human low-density jawbone. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[5]  J. Nebe,et al.  The influence of surface roughness of titanium on β1- and β3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells , 2005 .

[6]  T. Barker,et al.  Effect of metal surface topography on mechanical bonding at simulated total hip stem-cement interfaces. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  Xiaolong Zhu,et al.  Characterization of nano hydroxyapatite/collagen surfaces and cellular behaviors. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  J. Ellingsen Pre-treatment of titanium implants with fluoride improves their retention in bone , 1995 .

[10]  Hans Jacob Rønold,et al.  Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting--tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[11]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  D Buser,et al.  What is This? Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on February 23, 2013 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. International and American Associations for Dental ResearchRESEARCH REPORTS , 2004 .

[13]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Bone formation at titanium implants prepared with iso- and anisotropic surfaces of similar roughness: an in vivo study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[14]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[15]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Immunohistochemical studies on the distribution of albumin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, IgG and collagen around PTFE and titanium implants. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[16]  J. Kivilahti,et al.  SEM observations on stress corrosion cracking of commercially pure titanium in a topical fluoride solution. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  C. Sukotjo,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Osseous Implants Having Different Surface Topographies in Rats , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[18]  J. Nebe,et al.  The influence of surface roughness of titanium on beta1- and beta3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[19]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  An animal study of c.p. titanium screws with different surface topographies , 1995 .

[20]  L. Cooper,et al.  Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  A. Holmen,et al.  Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[22]  L. Cooper,et al.  Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[23]  Hans Jacob Rønold,et al.  The use of a coin shaped implant for direct in situ measurement of attachment strength for osseointegrating biomaterial surfaces. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[24]  D. Seabold,et al.  Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  Roger Watson,et al.  Tissue-integrated prostheses , 1985 .

[26]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[27]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  M. Textor,et al.  Anodic plasma-chemical treatment of CP titanium surfaces for biomedical applications. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[29]  A Wennerberg,et al.  Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  J. Gal,et al.  Influence of pH and fluoride concentration on titanium passivating layer: stability of titanium dioxide. , 2001, Talanta.

[31]  F. Butz,et al.  Harder and Stiffer Bone Osseointegrated to Roughened Titanium , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[32]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants – studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[33]  D. Seabold,et al.  Implant Surface Roughness Affects Osteoblast Gene Expression , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[34]  B. Kasemo Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[35]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[36]  F Rupp,et al.  High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[37]  A. P. Grande,et al.  The influence of hydrofluoric acid and fluoride ion on the corrosion and passive behaviour of titanium , 1987 .

[38]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials , 1986 .

[39]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  The role of functional parameters for topographical characterization of bone-anchored implants. , 2006, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[40]  M. Hallman,et al.  A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[41]  J. Lausmaa,et al.  Adhesion and activation of platelets and polymorphonuclear granulocyte cells at TiO2 surfaces. , 1997, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[42]  J. Bernard,et al.  Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[43]  J. Meyer,et al.  Effects of fluorides on titanium and other dental alloys in dentistry. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[44]  T. Ozaki,et al.  In vivo evaluation of bone-bonding of titanium metal chemically treated with a hydrogen peroxide solution containing tantalum chloride. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[45]  Alberto Cigada,et al.  Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of titanium implants with different surface treatments inserted in sheep cortical bone. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[46]  Peter Thomsen,et al.  Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration. , 2006, Periodontology 2000.

[47]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[48]  D. Seabold,et al.  Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[49]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.