A framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by parameterization, input data, model structure, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling

Failure to consider major sources of uncertainty may bias model predictions in simulating watershed behavior. A framework entitled the Integrated Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis Tool (IPEAT), was developed utilizing Bayesian inferences, an input error model and modified goodness-of-fit statistics to incorporate uncertainty in parameter, model structure, input data, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling. Applications of the framework at the Eagle Creek Watershed in Indiana shows that watershed behavior was more realistically represented when the four uncertainty sources were considered jointly without having to embed watershed behavior constraints in auto-calibration. Accounting for the major sources of uncertainty associated with watershed modeling produces more realistic predictions, improves the quality of calibrated solutions, and consequently reduces predictive uncertainty. IPEAT is an innovative tool to investigate and explore the significance of uncertainty sources, which enhances watershed modeling by improved characterization and assessment of predictive uncertainty.

[1]  John Doherty,et al.  Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  John R. Williams,et al.  Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance. , 2010 .

[3]  J. B. Kincer.  Our Changing Climate , 1939 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[5]  Thomas Meixner,et al.  A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models , 2007 .

[6]  Martin Volk,et al.  Influence of different nitrate–N monitoring strategies on load estimation as a base for model calibration and evaluation , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  Y. Sui,et al.  Nitrate Loss from Subsurface Drains in an Agricultural Watershed Using SWAT2005 , 2008 .

[8]  Hesham M. Bekhit,et al.  Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo to quantify parameter uncertainty and its effect on predictions of a groundwater flow model , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Differentiating Impacts of Land Use Changes from Pasture Management in a CEAP Watershed Using the SWAT Model , 2010 .

[10]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[11]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[12]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory , 2006 .

[13]  Kati W. Migliaccio,et al.  Modifying Goodness-of-Fit Indicators to Incorporate Both Measurement and Model Uncertainty in Model Calibration and Validation , 2010 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[15]  D. R. Smith,et al.  Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: A software tool for monitoring and modeling applications , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  SWAT Ungauged: Hydrological Budget and Crop Yield Predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin , 2010 .

[17]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Tamie L. Veith,et al.  Determination of Critical Source Areas for Phosphorus Loss: Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont , 2010 .

[19]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error , 2004 .

[20]  J. G. Arnold,et al.  Incorporation of a new shallow water table depth algorithm into SWAT2005. , 2009 .

[21]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[22]  Srinivasulu Ale,et al.  Evaluation of simulated strategies for reducing nitrate-nitrogen losses through subsurface drainage systems. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Statistical Methods In Hydrology , 1977 .

[24]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[25]  H. Yen.  Confronting input, parameter, structural, and measurement uncertainty in multi-site multiple-response watershed modeling using Bayesian inferences , 2012 .

[26]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologie rainfall‐runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases , 1980 .

[27]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Set-membership approach for identification of parameter and prediction uncertainty in power-law relationships: The case of sediment yield , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[29]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[30]  Keith J. Lucey,et al.  Effects of Climatic Variations over 11 Years on Nitrate‐Nitrogen Concentrations in the Raccoon River, Iowa , 1993 .

[31]  J. Arnold,et al.  Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management , 2005 .

[32]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  CUMULATIVE UNCERTAINTY IN MEASURED STREAMFLOW AND WATER QUALITY DATA FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS , 2006 .

[33]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[34]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments , 2002 .

[35]  Orazio Giustolisi,et al.  An evolutionary multiobjective strategy for the effective management of groundwater resources , 2008 .

[36]  R. Daren Harmel,et al.  Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling , 2007 .

[37]  N. Verhoest,et al.  Impact of soil hydraulic parameter uncertainty on soil moisture modeling , 2011 .

[38]  Gilbert T. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model , 1993 .

[39]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Uncertainty in predicted runoff due to patterns of spatially variable infiltration , 2007 .

[40]  C. Santhi,et al.  Evolution of the SCS Runoff Curve Number Method and Its Application to Continuous Runoff Simulation , 2012 .

[41]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[42]  Grant Hamilton,et al.  An approximate Bayesian computation approach for estimating parameters of complex environmental processes in a cellular automata , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Jing Yang,et al.  Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China , 2008 .

[44]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction , 2006 .

[45]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[46]  Cole H Green,et al.  HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR A LARGE TILE-DRAINED WATERSHED IN IOWA , 2006 .

[47]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Combining multiobjective optimization and Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles of soil hydraulic models , 2008 .

[48]  D. M. Amatya,et al.  Evaluating the SWAT Model for a Low-Gradient Forested Watershed in Coastal South Carolina , 2011 .

[49]  J. Topping,et al.  Errors of Observation and Their Treatment , 1957 .

[50]  Quan J. Wang,et al.  A Bayesian method for multi-site stochastic data generation: Dealing with non-concurrent and missing data, variable transformation and parameter uncertainty , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  Anònim Anònim.  Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[52]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration , 2007 .

[53]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[54]  Jeongwoo Lee,et al.  Effects of Streamflow Routing Schemes on Water Quality with SWAT , 2010 .

[55]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Statistical Procedure for Evaluating Hydrologic/Water Quality Models , 1995 .

[56]  Martin Volk,et al.  Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation , 2012 .

[57]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[58]  Margarida Tomé,et al.  Using a Bayesian framework and global sensitivity analysis to identify strengths and weaknesses of two process-based models differing in representation of autotrophic respiration , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[59]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF SWAT TO LANDSCAPES WITH TILES AND POTHOLES , 2005 .

[60]  Mahdi Ahmadi.  A multi criteria decision support system for watershed management under uncertain conditions , 2012 .

[61]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles , 2004 .

[62]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Sensitivity analysis based on regional splits and regression trees (SARS-RT) , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[63]  Aditya Sood,et al.  MODELING RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER BASIN USING SWAT - PILOT FOR CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED , 2010 .

[64]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Using a parallelized MCMC algorithm in R to identify appropriate likelihood functions for SWAT , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[65]  Michael F. Walter,et al.  Best management practices for agriculture and silviculture. , 1979 .

[66]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application , 2006 .

[67]  M B Beck,et al.  A random search methodology for examining parametric uncertainty in water quality models. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[68]  D. Kavetski,et al.  Confronting Input Uncertainty in Environmental Modelling , 2013 .

[69]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model: Current Developments and Applications , 2010 .

[70]  Christina Tonitto,et al.  Modeling denitrification in a tile-drained, corn and soybean agroecosystem of Illinois, USA , 2009 .

[71]  K. Schilling,et al.  Chemical transport from paired agricultural and restored prairie watersheds. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[72]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .