Making ‘Smart’ Use of a Sewer in Worcester, Massachusetts: A Cautionary Note on Smart Growth as an Economic Development Policy

Abstract This paper provides a conceptual critique of ‘smart growth’, an increasingly popular urban redevelopment strategy, as an economic development policy. It seeks to do this in two ways. First, an argument is made for how the smart growth movement is linked to more broad discourses of economic development. Second, through an urban political ecology analysis, it is suggested that smart growth, through the lens of the environment, reveals an uneven distribution of benefits among people affected by smart growth developments. This is because smart growth itself is embedded in a particular historical construction of environment. To explore these issues the author focuses on the Blackstone River and Canal, the site of a new smart growth development, in New England's third largest city of Worcester, Massachusetts. The Blackstone case presented here is exemplary in that it so clearly reflects the evolution of regional capitalist development, including the current one. Moreover, these periods, once past, are not relegated to the dustbins of history; rather they inform the next round of development. The case study below will thus reveal how these histories have, circuitously, played a role in the rationalization for the redevelopment of the canal as a smart growth project as well as elucidate the implications for the winners and losers of smart growth. The paper concludes with some thoughts on how we might, in practical terms, unlock the progressive potential of this development paradigm.

[1]  R. Krueger.  Relocating Regulation in Montana's Gold Mining Industry , 2002 .

[2]  Timothy P. Duane.  Transforming California: A Political History of Land Use and Development , 2000 .

[3]  L. Pulido.  Environmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest , 1996 .

[4]  N. Heynen.  The Scalar Production of Injustice within the Urban Forest , 2003 .

[5]  L. Pil.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[6]  Maria Kaika,et al.  Fetishising the Modern City: the Phantasmagoria of Urban Technological Networks , 2000 .

[7]  H. Molotch.  The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  D. Massey.  Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production , 1985 .

[9]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870-1920 , 1984 .

[10]  E. Swyngedouw.  Modernity and Hibridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890-1930 , 2004 .

[11]  Harold Brookfield,et al.  Land degradation and society , 1988 .

[12]  James Evans.  What is local about local environmental governance? Observations from the local biodiversity action planning process , 2004 .

[13]  I. Nakagawa.  Charles Landry, The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators, Earthscan Publication Ltd, 2000 , 2004 .

[14]  P. Walker.  Reconsidering ‘regional’ political ecologies: toward a political ecology of the rural American West , 2003 .

[15]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe , 1989 .

[16]  N. Smith.  Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space , 1984 .

[17]  M. Gandy.  Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City , 2002 .

[18]  Geoff Anderson,et al.  Why Smart Growth: A Primer , 1998 .

[19]  E. Sheridan.  Environmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest , 1996 .

[20]  N. Smith.  The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City , 1997 .

[21]  E. Hamilton-Smith,et al.  Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously , 2003 .

[22]  M. Aldrich.  Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870–1920. By Roy Rosenzweig. Cambridge, London, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983. Pp. xi, 304. $29.95 , 1984, The Journal of Economic History.

[23]  David Gibbs,et al.  Local Economic Development and the Environment , 2002 .

[24]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Use of Information Technology for Community Empowerment: Transforming Geographic Information Systems into Community Information Systems , 2001, Trans. GIS.

[25]  Rob Krueger,et al.  Sustainability schizophrenia or “actually existing sustainabilities?” toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US , 2005 .

[26]  N. G. Leigh.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Smart Growth , 2005 .

[27]  J. Frece.  Twenty Lessons From Maryland's Smart Growth Initiative , 2005 .

[28]  Chris C. Miller.  The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators , 2001 .

[29]  Linxin Ye,et al.  What Is “Smart Growth?”—Really? , 2005 .

[30]  D. Chen,et al.  The science of smart growth. , 2000, Scientific American.

[31]  Erik Swyngedouw,et al.  Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930 , 1999 .

[32]  鈴木 晃志郎,et al.  書評 : リチャード・フロリダ著・井口典夫訳(2008)「クリエイティブ資本論 新たな経済階級の台頭」ダイヤモンド社. Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books. , 2009 .

[33]  J. Agyeman,et al.  Sprawl, Smart Growth and Sustainability , 2002 .