ERP evidence of a meaningfulness impact on visual global/local processing: When meaning captures attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
O. Houdé | V. Beaucousin | M. Cassotti | G. Simon | A. Pineau | M. Kostova | N. Poirel
[1] O. Reiser,et al. Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .
[2] R. B. Macleod,et al. A Source Book Of Gestalt Psychology , 1939 .
[3] L. Zusne. Visual perception of form , 1970 .
[4] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[5] R. C. Oldfield. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .
[6] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[7] E Donchin,et al. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[8] S A Hillyard,et al. Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[9] S. Hillyard,et al. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] M. Corbetta,et al. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[11] R. Kimchi. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[12] G. Humphreys,et al. Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] G. Mangun,et al. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[14] G W Humphreys,et al. Automatic access to object identity: attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[15] S. Thorpe,et al. Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.
[16] Y. Zhuo,et al. On the Different Processing of Wholes and Parts: A Psychophysiological Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[17] J. Marshall,et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in global⧹local processing are modulated by perceptual salience , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[18] A Zani,et al. Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[19] G. Mangun,et al. Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] Thomas F Münte,et al. Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[21] D L Woods,et al. Hierarchical processing and level-repetition effect as indexed by early brain potentials. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[22] Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al. Brain Areas Involved in Rapid Categorization of Natural Images: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2000, NeuroImage.
[23] S. Hevenor,et al. The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: evidence for lateralization at early stages of processing , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[24] Shingo Yamagata,et al. Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[25] E. Yund,et al. Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: an ERP study , 2000, Neuroreport.
[26] E. Vogel,et al. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[27] W. Singer,et al. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[28] J. Bullier. Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.
[29] Rufin van Rullen,et al. Rate Coding Versus Temporal Order Coding: What the Retinal Ganglion Cells Tell the Visual Cortex , 2001, Neural Computation.
[30] J. Tanaka,et al. A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.
[31] E. Yund,et al. Attentional selection in the processing of hierarchical patterns: an ERP study , 2001, Biological Psychology.
[32] S. Thorpe,et al. The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[33] J. Tanaka,et al. An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[34] S. Bentin,et al. Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.
[35] M. Bar. A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] D. Navon. What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? , 2003, Acta psychologica.
[37] E. Yund,et al. An ERP study of the global precedence effect: the role of spatial frequency , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[38] Y. Zhuo,et al. Modulation of Brain Activities by Hierarchical Processing: A High-Density ERP Study , 2004, Brain Topography.
[39] N. Kanwisher,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .
[40] Ruth Kimchi,et al. Microgenesis and Ontogenesis of Perceptual Organization , 2005, Psychological science.
[41] Shihui Han,et al. Neural correlates of within-level and across-level attention to multiple compound stimuli , 2006, Brain Research.
[42] Grégory Simon,et al. Orthographic transparency and grapheme–phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers , 2006, Brain Research.
[43] E Mellet,et al. Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli. , 2006, Acta psychologica.
[44] Laurent Petit,et al. N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.
[45] E. Mellet,et al. First came the trees, then the forest: developmental changes during childhood in the processing of visual local-global patterns according to the meaningfulness of the stimuli. , 2008, Developmental psychology.
[46] Emmanuel Mellet,et al. What does the nature of the stimuli tell us about the Global Precedence Effect? , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[47] J. Hegdé. Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.
[48] O. Houdé,et al. Meaningfulness and global–local processing in schizophrenia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[49] M. Seghier,et al. The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] John J. B. Allen,et al. Neurophysiological evidence for the influence of past experience on figure-ground perception. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[51] Haline E. Schendan,et al. Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500ms , 2010, Brain Research.