Comparison of support vector machine, artificial neural network, and spectral angle mapper algorithms for crop classification using LISS IV data

The Resourcesat-2 is a highly suitable satellite for crop classification studies with its improved features and capabilities. Data from one of its sensors, the linear imaging and self-scanning (LISS IV), which has a spatial resolution of 5.8 m, was used to compare the relative accuracies achieved by support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and spectral angle mapper (SAM) algorithms for the classification of various crops and non-crop covering a part of Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India. The separability analysis was performed using a transformed divergence (TD) method between categories to assess the quality of training samples. The outcome of the present study indicates better performance of SVM and ANN algorithms in comparison to SAM for the classification using LISS IV sensor data. The overall accuracies obtained by SVM and ANN were 93.45% and 92.32%, respectively, whereas the lower accuracy of 74.99% was achieved using the SAM algorithm through error matrix analysis. Results derived from SVM, ANN, and SAM classification algorithms were validated with the ground truth information acquired by the field visit on the same day of satellite data acquisition.

[1]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Pruning artificial neural networks: An example using land cover classification of multi-sensor images , 1999 .

[2]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Feature Selection for Classification of Hyperspectral Data by SVM , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  G. Girouard,et al.  Validated Spectral Angle Mapper Algorithm for Geological Mapping : Comparative Study between Quickbird and Landsat-TM , 2004 .

[4]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction Neural networks in remote sensing , 1997 .

[5]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  C. Yonezawa Maximum likelihood classification combined with spectral angle mapper algorithm for high resolution satellite imagery , 2007 .

[7]  L. S. Davis,et al.  An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classi(cid:142) cation , 2002 .

[8]  Elif Sertel,et al.  Parcel-Level Identification of Crop Types Using Different Classification Algorithms and Multi-Resolution Imagery in Southeastern Turkey , 2013 .

[9]  E. Moran,et al.  Deforestation in North-Central Yucatan 1985-1995) : Mapping secondary succession of forest and agricultural land use in Sotuta using the cosine of the angle concept , 1999 .

[10]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network , 1997 .

[11]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation , 2016 .

[13]  D. Roberts,et al.  Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales , 2005 .

[14]  César Hervás-Martínez,et al.  A multi-objective neural network based method for cover crop identification from remote sensed data , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  S. N. Omkar,et al.  Crop classification using biologically-inspired techniques with high resolution satellite image , 2008 .

[16]  G. Foody Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy , 2004 .

[17]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[18]  N. S. Rebello,et al.  Supervised and Unsupervised Spectral Angle Classifiers , 2002 .

[19]  M. V. R. Sesha Sai,et al.  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation Utilization of Resourcesat-1 data for improved crop discrimination , 2008 .

[20]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Fusion of Support Vector Machines for Classification of Multisensor Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  M Chakraborty,et al.  Comparative performance of per-pixel classifiers using ers-1 sar data for classification of rice crop , 1997 .

[22]  Dawei Han,et al.  Selection of classification techniques for land use - land cover change investigation , 2012 .

[23]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[24]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification , 2003 .

[25]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[26]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Kernel-based extreme learning machine for remote-sensing image classification , 2013 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[28]  Juan J. Flores,et al.  The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data , 2008 .

[29]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Winter Crops at Sub-Pixel Level Using AVHRR NDVI Time Series and Neural Nets , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Support vector machines for recognition of semi-arid vegetation types using MISR multi-angle imagery , 2007 .