Background: The primary cause of ischemic heart failure (HF) is myocardial infarction (MI) resulting in left ventricle (LV) wall motion abnormality secondary to ventricular remodeling. A prospective, nonrandomized study conducted in China was designed to assess safety and efficacy of the percutaneous ventricular restoration therapy using Parachute device (CardioKinetix, Inc., CA, USA) in ischemic HF patients as a result of LV remodeling after anterior wall MI. Methods: Thirty-one patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III ischemic HF, ejection fraction between 15% and 40%, and dilated akinetic or dyskinetic anterior-apical wall without the need to be revascularized were enrolled from seven sites in China from October to December 2014. The Parachute device was implanted through femoral artery. All patients received low-dose aspirin and anticoagulation with warfarin for at least 12 months postdevice implantation. The primary end-point was the assessment of efficacy as measured by the reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) against baseline LVESVI at 3 months postdevice implantation, determined by the echocardiography and measured by echocardiography core laboratory. Quality of life was assessed using EQ-5D and visual analog scale (VAS). For quantitative data comparison, paired t-test (normality data) and signed-rank test (abnormality data) were used; application of signed-rank test was for the ranked data comparison. Results: A change in LVESVI as measured by echocardiography from the preimplant baseline to 3-month postdevice implantation revealed a statistically significant reduction from 77.5 ± 20.0 ml/m2 to 53.1 ± 17.0 ml/m2 (P < 0.0001). The trial met its primary end-point. Of the 31 patients, the procedural success was 96.8%. Overall, NYHA HF class assessment results showed an improvement of more than half a class at 3 months (P < 0.001). Quality of life assessed by the VAS value increased 11.5 points (P < 0.01), demonstrating improvement at 3 months. Conclusion: The favorable outcomes observed in the high-risk patients provide reassuring safety and efficacy data to support adoption of this technology as a therapeutic option for ischemic HF patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02240940; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02240940.
[1]
C. Nienaber,et al.
Percutaneous ventricular restoration (PVR) therapy using the Parachute device in 100 subjects with ischaemic dilated heart failure: one-year primary endpoint results of PARACHUTE III, a European trial.
,
2015,
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[2]
Harlan M Krumholz,et al.
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data
,
2015,
The Lancet.
[3]
W. Abraham,et al.
Percutaneous Ventricular Restoration Using the Parachute Device in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure: Three-Year Outcomes of the PARACHUTE First-in-Human Study
,
2014,
Circulation. Heart failure.
[4]
Harlan M Krumholz,et al.
National and regional trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-2008.
,
2011,
JAMA.
[5]
Paul W. Armstrong,et al.
Progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction.
,
1993,
Circulation.
[6]
Peter Gaudron,et al.
Progressive Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction Potential Mechanisms and Early Predictors
,
1993,
Circulation.
[7]
M. Pfeffer,et al.
Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications
,
1990,
Circulation.