Support optimization for additive manufacturing: application to FDM

Purpose This paper aims to present a new methodology to optimize the support generation within the fused deposition modeling process. Design/methodology/approach Different methods of support generation exist, but they are limited with regards to complex parts. This paper proposes a method dedicated to support generation, integrated into CAD software. The objective is to minimize the volume of support and its impact on a part’s surface finish. Two case studies illustrate the methodology. The support generation is based on an octree’s discretization of the part. Findings The method represents a first solid step in the support optimization for a reasonable calculation time. It has the advantage of being virtually automatic. The only tasks to be performed by the designer are to place the part to be studied with respect to the CAD reference and to give the ratio between the desired support volume and the maximum volume of support. Research limitations/implications In the case studies, a low gain in manufacturing time was observed. This is explained by the honeycomb structure of the support generated by a common slicing software, whereas the proposed method uses a “full” structure. It would be interesting to study the feasibility of an optimized support, with a honeycomb structure but with a preservation of the surface which is in contact with the part. Originality/value This solution best fits the needs of the designer and manufacturer already taking advantage of existing solutions. It is adaptable to any part if the withdrawal of support is taken into account. It also allows the designer to validate the generation of support throughout the CAD without breaking the digital chain.

[1]  Eckhard Beyer,et al.  Laser Beam Build-Up Welding: Precision in Repair, Surface Cladding, and Direct 3D Metal Deposition , 2007 .

[2]  J. Giannatsis,et al.  Genetic-algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of the build orientation in stereolithography , 2009 .

[3]  Flaviana Calignano,et al.  Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting , 2014 .

[4]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[5]  Ismail Durgun,et al.  Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost , 2014 .

[6]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies , 1998 .

[7]  André Dolenc,et al.  Slicing procedures for layered manufacturing techniques , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight , 2006 .

[9]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing , 2009 .

[10]  Jean-Yves Hascoët,et al.  Manufacturability analysis to combine additive and subtractive processes , 2010 .

[11]  Richard M. Everson,et al.  A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing , 2013 .

[12]  Weiyin Ma,et al.  NURBS-based adaptive slicing for efficient rapid prototyping , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[13]  Rupinder Singh,et al.  Some investigations for small‐sized product fabrication with FDM for plastic components , 2013 .

[14]  R. Everson,et al.  Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing , 2013 .