Test-retest reliability and inter-tester reliability of kinematic data from a three-dimensional gait analysis system.

This study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability and inter-tester reliability of kinematic measures in a three-dimensional gait analysis system. Using a VICON 140™ three-dimensional motion analysis system, kinematic data for lower extremities during walking were collected by 2 testers (senior physical therapists) for 6 unimpaired adults (age = 20 to 52; mean = 35.2 ± 6.2). The study was conducted using a repeated measures design consisting of two testing sessions per day on two separate testing days. The reliability of joint angle data collected by two different testers on two different days was compared for 2 sessions (days) × 2 testers × 5 trials. Skin markers were placed on 15 defined pelvis and lower body locations in accordance with the VICON Clinical Manager model. Prior to the study commencing, the two physical therapists practiced marker placement for a 3 month period. The first measurements (T1) were carried out by two testers on the same day. The second measurement session (T2) was performed within two weeks using an identical procedure. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) were calculated to evaluate the consistency between the kinematic variables across testers and sessions. Both test-retest and inter-tester reliability were high for motion in the sagittal plane (R a= 0.971 to 0.994), the frontal plane (R a= 0.759 to 0.977), and the transverse plane (R a= 0.729 to 0.899), excluding pelvic tilt. Reduction of variability of marker placement appears possible with standardization and understanding of the placement method. These findings provide evidence of the reliability of using three-dimensional motion analysis for measuring human gait.

[1]  D. Winter Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects , 1984 .

[2]  E. Zwick,et al.  Intrasubject repeatability of gait analysis data in normal and spastic children. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  M. J. Muêller,et al.  Reliability of kinematic measurements of rear-foot motion. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[4]  D. Sutherland,et al.  Measurement of gait movements from motion picture film. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  P D O'Connor,et al.  The effect of marker placement deviations on spinal range of motion determined by video motion analysis. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[6]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[8]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Gait analysis methodology , 1984 .

[9]  D. Winter Biomechanical motor patterns in normal walking. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  P D O'Connor,et al.  Intrasubject reliability of spinal range of motion and velocity determined by video motion analysis. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[11]  J. P. Scholz Reliability and validity of the WATSMART three-dimensional optoelectric motion analysis system. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[12]  D. V. Vander Linden,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of angle measurements obtained under static conditions with the Motion Analysis video system. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[13]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  A M Wing,et al.  Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.