Available processing resources influence encoding-related brain activity before an event

Effective cognitive functioning not only relies on brain activity elicited by an event, but also on activity that precedes it. This has been demonstrated in a number of cognitive domains, including memory. Here, we show that brain activity that precedes the effective encoding of a word into long-term memory depends on the availability of sufficient processing resources. We recorded electrical brain activity from the scalps of healthy adult men and women while they memorized intermixed visual and auditory words for later recall. Each word was preceded by a cue that indicated the modality of the upcoming word. The degree to which processing resources were available before word onset was manipulated by asking participants to make an easy or difficult perceptual discrimination on the cue. Brain activity before word onset predicted later recall of the word, but only in the easy discrimination condition. These findings indicate that anticipatory influences on long-term memory are limited in capacity and sensitive to the degree to which attention is divided between tasks. Prestimulus activity that affects later encoding can only be engaged when the necessary cognitive resources can be allocated to the encoding process.

[1]  C. Frith,et al.  Shifting baselines in attention research , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Masa-aki Sato,et al.  The effects of feature attention on prestimulus cortical activity in the human visual system. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Leun J. Otten,et al.  Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects for Auditory and Visual Events , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[5]  Thomas Koenig,et al.  Different Brain Activities Predict Retrieval Success during Emotional and Semantic Encoding , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Prestimulus hippocampal activity predicts later recollection , 2009, Hippocampus.

[8]  M. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval processing and episodic memory , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  U. Rutishauser,et al.  Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons , 2010, Nature.

[10]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[11]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding processes in memory: mapping the locus of interference. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  M Meeter,et al.  Mode shifting between storage and recall based on novelty detection in oscillating hippocampal circuits , 2004, Hippocampus.

[14]  B. Staresina,et al.  Medial Temporal Theta/Alpha Power Enhancement Precedes Successful Memory Encoding: Evidence Based on Intracranial EEG , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Voluntary Control over Prestimulus Activity Related to Encoding , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Ewald Moser,et al.  The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Rugg,et al.  Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Dissociable Effects of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention during Episodic Encoding , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Todd W. Thompson,et al.  When the brain is prepared to learn: Enhancing human learning using real-time fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Preparatory Processes and Compensatory Effort in Older and Younger Participants in a Driving-Like Dual Task , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Giulia Galli,et al.  Sex Differences in the Use of Anticipatory Brain Activity to Encode Emotional Events , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  E. Düzel,et al.  Medial temporal theta state before an event predicts episodic encoding success in humans , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Emrah Düzel,et al.  Early, partly anticipatory, neural oscillations during identification set the stage for priming , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000 .

[26]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  H. Heinze,et al.  Reward-Related fMRI Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Is Associated with Enhanced Hippocampus- Dependent Long-Term Memory Formation , 2005, Neuron.

[28]  Issidoros C. Sarinopoulos,et al.  The effect of anticipation and the specificity of sex differences for amygdala and hippocampus function in emotional memory , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  H J Keselman,et al.  Repeated measures F tests and psychophysiological research: controlling the number of false positives. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[31]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Electrocortical signs of levels of processing: perceptual analysis and recognition memory. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[32]  R. Roberts,et al.  ERP repetition effects in indirect and direct tasks: effects of age and interitem lag. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[33]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[34]  T W Picton,et al.  Attention and successful episodic encoding: an event-related potential study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  Giulia Galli,et al.  Prestimulus brain activity predicts primacy in list learning , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[36]  Giulia Galli,et al.  Material-specific Neural Correlates of Recollection: Objects, Words, and Faces , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Marsh,et al.  Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Increased attentional demands impair contralesional space awareness following stroke , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Reward-Motivated Learning: Mesolimbic Activation Precedes Memory Formation , 2006, Neuron.

[41]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[42]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  K. Paller,et al.  Observing the transformation of experience into memory , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.