MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION

This paper examines the multiple scenario approach as an important corporate innovation in strategic planning. Using a participant/observer perspective, I examine how scenario planning tries to meet certain methodological, organizational and psychological challenges facing today's senior managers. Three prime characteristics are identified as setting the scenario approach apart from more traditional planning tools: (1) the script or narrative approach, (2) uncertainty across rather than within models, and (3) the decomposition of a complex future into discrete states. After exploring the intellectual roots of scenario planning, I examine such organizational aspects as the need for diversity of views and the importance of simplicity and manageability. Both benefits and obstacles to using scenarios in organizations are identified. Cognitive biases are examined as well, especially the well-known biases of overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy. Two experiments test the impact of scenarios on people's subjective confidence ranges. Another two experiments test the internal coherence of subjects' beliefs. The psychological benefit of scenario planning appears to tie in the exploitation of one set of biases (e.g., conjunction fallacies) to counteract another (such as overconfidence).

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[3]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[4]  Morton D. Davis,et al.  Games of Strategy: Theory and Application. , 1962 .

[5]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[6]  Nuel Pharr Davis Lawrence and Oppenheimer , 1968 .

[7]  J. C. Naylor,et al.  Intuitive inference strategies in interval learning tasks as a function of validity magnitude and sign , 1968 .

[8]  F. Zwicky Discovery, Invention, Research through the morphological approach , 1969 .

[9]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[10]  E. Jantsch The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[11]  J. Earman,et al.  The Cement Of The Universe , 1974 .

[12]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[14]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[15]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[16]  Herman Kahn,et al.  The next 200 years : a scenario for America and the world , 1977 .

[17]  I. Mitroff,et al.  Methodological Approaches To Social Science , 1978 .

[18]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[19]  I. Mitroff,et al.  On Strategic Assumption-Making: A Dialectical Approach to Policy and Planning , 1979 .

[20]  William C. Wedley,et al.  Problem Solving the Delphi Way , 1979 .

[21]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[22]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance , 1980 .

[23]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[24]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  Forecasting and Planning: An Evaluation , 1981 .

[25]  R. Mason Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[26]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. , 1981 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[28]  David C. Bell,et al.  POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO DECISION ANALYSIS , 1982 .

[29]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[30]  Stephen M. Pollock,et al.  Multiple attribute scenarios, bounded probabilities, and threats of nuclear theft , 1982 .

[31]  M. Godet From forecasting to ‘la prospective’ a new way of looking at futures , 1982 .

[32]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments , 1982 .

[33]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Requisite Decision Modelling: A Case Study , 1982 .

[34]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[35]  D. Berkeley,et al.  Structuring decision problems and the ‘bias heuristic’ , 1982 .

[36]  Robert E. Linneman,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios by U.S. industrial companies: A comparison study, 1977–1981☆ , 1983 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[38]  H. S. Becker,et al.  Scenarios: A tool of growing importance to policy analysts in government and industry , 1983 .

[39]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics , 1983 .

[40]  David J. Smyth,et al.  Short-run macroeconomic forecasting: The OECD performance , 1983 .

[41]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Strategic decision analysis: Applied decision analysis and its role in the strategic management process , 1984 .

[42]  Charles R. Schwenk Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making , 1984 .

[43]  A. Toffler,et al.  The Adaptive Corporation , 1984 .

[44]  James H. Barnes Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning , 1984 .

[45]  Pentti Malaska,et al.  Multiple Scenario Approach and Strategic Behaviour in European Companies , 1985 .

[46]  WILLIAM L. PARTRIDGE,et al.  Toward a Theory of Practice , 1985 .

[47]  Robert E. Linneman,et al.  Using scenarios in strategic decision making , 1985 .

[48]  Helmut Jungermann Inferential processes in the construction of scenarios , 1985 .

[49]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[50]  R. G. Murdick,et al.  Manager's guide to forecasting , 1986 .

[51]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  Scenarios for Strategic Business Planning: A Case History for Aerospace and Defense Companies , 1986 .

[52]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[53]  Steven P. Schnaars,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios in sales forecasting: An empirical test , 1987 .

[54]  R L Keeney,et al.  A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[55]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[56]  M. Godet Scenarios and strategic management , 1987 .

[57]  Clem Sunter The world and South Africa in the 1990s , 1987 .

[58]  William R. Huss,et al.  A move toward scenario analysis , 1988 .

[59]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt,et al.  Learning and comprehension of text , 1988 .

[60]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[61]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[62]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[63]  Steven P. Schnaars,et al.  Megamistakes: Forecasting and the Myth of Rapid Technological Change, Steven P. Schnaars. 1988. Free Press. 224 pages. ISBN: 0-02-927952-6. $19.95 , 1989 .

[64]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Using Drama to Persuade , 1989 .

[65]  N. Pennington,et al.  Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events , 1989 .

[66]  Fereidoon P. Sioshansi,et al.  Scenario Planning at Southern California Edison , 1989 .

[67]  Manfred Thüring,et al.  The Conjunction fallacy: Causality vs. event probability , 1990 .

[68]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[69]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  When and how to use scenario planning: A heuristic approach with illustration , 1991 .

[70]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[71]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell , 1992 .