Faculty Motivators and De-motivators for Teaching Online: Results of Focus Group Interviews at One University

What are the most significant factors that motivate and inhibit faculty with regard to teaching in online environments? And what are the specific kinds of experiences that underlie and explain the importance of these factors? Exploring these questions through structured focus group discussions is the primary goal of this study. The second goal is to provide insight regarding how to engage and retain a larger number of faculty in online teaching. This paper describes the methods and results of a pilot study conducted using focus group interviews of faculty experienced in teaching using "asynchronous learning networks" (ALN) at one university. Leading motivators are the flexibility allowed by being able to teach "anytime/anywhere;" better/more personal interaction and community building supported by the medium; the technical and creativity challenges offered by this mode of teaching; being able to reach more (and more diverse) students; and better course management. Major sources of dissatisfaction are more work, medium limitations, lack of adequate support and policies for teaching online, and the fact that the medium is not a good fit for some students

[1]  John Hattie,et al.  Reexamining the Stages of Concern Questionnaire: A Test of Alternative Models , 2001 .

[2]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes , 2000 .

[3]  R. Alfaro-LeFevre.  Critical thinking. , 1997, Nursing spectrum.

[4]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[5]  E. Allen,et al.  Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United State , 2004 .

[6]  P. Shea,et al.  Increasing Access to Higher Education: A Study of the Diffusion of Online Teaching among 913 College Faculty. , 2005 .

[7]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Interface: The Use and Misuse of Focus Groups , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[8]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2004 .

[9]  P. Leavy,et al.  The Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[10]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Barriers to distance education: A factor‐analytic study , 2001 .

[11]  Frances F. Fuller.  Concerns of Teachers: A Developmental Conceptualization1 , 1969 .

[12]  Richard A. Krueger.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Second Edition , 1994 .

[13]  P. Shea,et al.  ONLINE TEACHING AS A CATALYST FOR CLASSROOM-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL TRANSFORMATION , 2002 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  S. Anderson,et al.  Understanding Teacher Change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model , 1997 .

[16]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  The Concerns-Based Adoption Model: A Developmental Conceptualization of the Adoption Process Within Educational Institutions. , 1973 .

[17]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[18]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Faculty Roles and Satisfaction in Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2004 .

[20]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Using Information Technology in Learning: Case Studies in Business and Management Education Programs , 2003 .

[21]  Mac Nason.  Hiltz, S.R., & Goldman, R. (Eds.). (2005). Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks , 2006, Education and Information Technologies.

[22]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .