Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior

The authors propose that need for cognition, an individual’s tendency to engage in and enjoy thinking, is associated with individual innovation behavior. Moreover, drawing on an interactionist perspective, the authors suggest that need for cognition becomes more important when individuals face lower job autonomy and time pressure in their work. This is because, when these job characteristics are low, there is no contextual driving force for individual innovation, so personality has a stronger influence. In a multisource study of 179 employees working in a Dutch research and consultancy organization, the authors’ expectations were largely supported. They found that need for cognition was positively associated with peer-rated innovation behavior, as were job autonomy and time pressure, even when controlling for openness to experience and proactive personality. Furthermore, the relationship between need for cognition and innovation behavior was strongest for individuals with low job autonomy and low time pressure and indeed was nonexistent at high levels of these contextual variables. This study, therefore, suggests that context can substitute for an individual’s need for cognition when it comes to individual innovation.

[1]  Julie Holland,et al.  An experience sampling study of learning, affect, and the demands control support model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Jing Zhou.  When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  G. Spreitzer.  Proactivity in the Work Place: Looking Back and Looking Forward , 2010 .

[4]  J. B. Fuller,et al.  Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design , 2006 .

[5]  D. G. Gardner,et al.  Activation theory and task design: an empirical test of several new predictions. , 1986, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[7]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Us and Me: Team Identification and Individual Differentiation as Complementary Drivers of Team Members' Citizenship and Creative Behaviors , 2008 .

[9]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[10]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[12]  G. Latham,et al.  Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates , 1993 .

[14]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[15]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Personality and Persuasion : Need for Cognition Moderates the Persistence and Resistance of Attitude Changes , 2004 .

[16]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[17]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[18]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[19]  K N Nokes,et al.  Assessing the work environment. , 1986, The Journal of nursing administration.

[20]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Proactivity and Innovation: Promoting a New Workforce for the New Workplace , 2003 .

[21]  Uta K. Bindl,et al.  Proactive Work Behavior: Forward-Thinking and Change-Oriented Action in Organizations , 2011 .

[22]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[23]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  Classification of personality traits. , 1987 .

[24]  H. Zur,et al.  The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior , 1981 .

[25]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[26]  C. Shalley,et al.  RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[27]  R. Dalal,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of Situational Strength in the Organizational Sciences , 2010 .

[28]  R. Petty,et al.  Individual Differences in Attitude Change , 2005 .

[29]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[30]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Need for cognition and interpersonal influence : Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions , 1998 .

[31]  James R. Bailey,et al.  Need for cognition and response mode in the active construction of an information domain , 1997 .

[32]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[33]  D. Fay,et al.  Rethinking the effects of stressors: a longitudinal study on personal initiative. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  Nick Turner,et al.  Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[36]  Cheryl B. Jones,et al.  Does safety climate moderate the influence of staffing adequacy and work conditions on nurse injuries? , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[37]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition , 2010 .

[38]  C. Carver,et al.  Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  S. Parker,et al.  Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: the role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  R. Woodman,et al.  Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations , 2010 .

[41]  Onne Janssen,et al.  The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour , 2005 .

[42]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  There's No Place like Home? The Contributions of Work and Nonwork Creativity Support to Employees' Creative Performance , 2002 .

[43]  Nora Madjar,et al.  Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity , 2008 .

[44]  S. Parker,et al.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[46]  N. Ramamoorthy,et al.  Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model , 2005 .

[47]  N. Endler,et al.  Interactionism: a personality model, but not yet a theory. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[48]  C. Fritz,et al.  Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi‐level study , 2010 .

[49]  S. Parker,et al.  "THAT'S NOT MY JOB": DEVELOPING FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE WORK ORIENTATIONS , 1997 .

[50]  S. Sonnentag.  Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[52]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Understanding and assessing safety culture through the lens of organizational management of uncertainty , 2007 .

[53]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[54]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[55]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[56]  Nokes Kn,et al.  Assessing the work environment. , 1986 .

[57]  R. Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Fergus I M Craik.  Attention: selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent Edited by Alan Baddeley and Lawrence Weiskrantz. Oxford University press, 1993 , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Onne Janssen.  Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour , 2000 .

[60]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Daily performance at work : feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance , 2009 .

[61]  S. Parker,et al.  Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors , 2010 .

[62]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[63]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence , 2004 .

[64]  S Ramnarayan,et al.  Individual Differences in Need for Cognition and Complex Problem Solving , 2000 .

[65]  P. Levy,et al.  Proactive personality and the successful job search: a field investigation with college graduates. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  J. Kirby,et al.  Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[68]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Work motivation : past, present, and future , 2008 .

[69]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[70]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  J. George,et al.  When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[72]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[73]  S. Dollinger,et al.  Need for Uniqueness, Need for Cognition, and Creativity. , 2003 .

[74]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[75]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The Handbook of Attitudes , 2005 .

[76]  G. Graen,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .

[77]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[78]  George F. Farris,et al.  Time Pressure and Performance of Scientists and Engineers; A Five-Year Panel Study , 2015 .

[79]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[80]  Dong Liu,et al.  From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  Paul R. Jackson,et al.  The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology , 2003 .

[82]  G. Robert J. Hockey,et al.  Cognitive-energetical control mechanisms in the management of work demands and psychological health. , 1993 .

[83]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.