Diversity in Demographic Characteristics, Abilities and Personality Traits: Do Faultlines Affect Team Functioning?

This study examines the impact of faultlines within teams on cohesion and conflicts. Faultlines concern the attributes of several team members simultaneously and mirror the structure of diversity within a team. The strength of a faultline indicates the level of similarity within potential subgroups and its width the extent of dissimilarity between them. The faultlines addressed in this study are based upon the demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits of team members. We also address the interaction of team autonomy on the effects of faultlines. Data for this study were collected by means of questionnaires administered to 99 teams of undergraduate students. The results indicate that demographic faultlines directly impair the functioning of a team. Team autonomy conditioned both the relationship between the strength of the ability faultline and team cohesion and the relationship between the depth of the personality faultline and intra-team conflict. In other words, these faultlines are more detrimental to team functioning when team autonomy is high. Ability faultlines seem to emphasize similarities within subgroups, while personality faultlines accentuate dissimilarities between subgroups.

[1]  Chung Yee Lee,et al.  Cross-Training Effectiveness and Profitability , 1994 .

[2]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .

[3]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[4]  Dick de Gilder,et al.  Expectation States Theory and the Motivational Determinants of Social Influence , 1994 .

[5]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  Functional flexibility and team performance , 1999 .

[6]  Eric Molleman,et al.  VARIETY AND THE REQUISITE OF SELF‐ORGANIZATION , 1998 .

[7]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance , 2003 .

[8]  A. van den Beukel,et al.  Multifunctionality: Driving and constraining forces , 1998 .

[9]  K. Jehn Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. , 1997 .

[10]  Peg Thoms,et al.  The relationship between self‐efficacy for participating in self‐managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions , 1996 .

[11]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[12]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[14]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[15]  Lisa Hope Pelled RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1996 .

[16]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[17]  Claus W. Langfred Work-Group Design and Autonomy , 2000 .

[18]  Robert T. Golembiewski Managing diversity in organizations , 1995 .

[19]  Michael A. West,et al.  Team Effectiveness in Organizations , 1998 .

[20]  B. Evans,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Participatory Decision-Making, Job Autonomy, and Perceived Control , 1992 .

[21]  G. Vandervegt Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[22]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance , 2001 .

[23]  R. Wageman Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[24]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[25]  Michael J. Brusco,et al.  Staffing a Multiskilled Workforce with Varying Levels of Productivity: An Analysis of Cross‐training Policies* , 1998 .

[26]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Equity Theory Revisited: Comments and Annotated Bibliography , 1976 .

[27]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Social psychology and intergroup conflict , 2001 .

[28]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[29]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[30]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  Components of Group Cohesion , 1983 .

[31]  J. Breaugh The Measurement of Work Autonomy , 1985 .

[32]  S. Parker,et al.  Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design , 2001 .

[33]  Eric Molleman,et al.  Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach , 2001 .

[34]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[35]  D. Chan Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[36]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[37]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Explaining How Survivors Respond to Downsizing: The Roles of Trust, Empowerment, Justice, and Work Redesign , 1998 .

[38]  Eric Molleman,et al.  Barriers to the development of self‐organizing teams , 1999 .

[39]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[40]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[41]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[42]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Impact of Cross-Training on Team Functioning: An Empirical Investigation , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[44]  R. Simon The consequences of “diversity” , 1996 .

[45]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  A Field Study of Group Faultlines, Team Identity, Conflict, and Performance in Organizational Groups , 2001 .

[46]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[47]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[48]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[49]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[50]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[51]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[52]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[53]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[54]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Resource Flexibility Issues in Multistage Manufacturing , 1990 .

[55]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[56]  Paul Iles,et al.  Managing diversity in transnational project teams , 1997 .

[57]  Charles C. Manz Self-Leading Work Teams: Moving Beyond Self-Management Myths , 1992 .

[58]  R. Liden,et al.  Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .

[59]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[60]  J. Stoker,et al.  Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams , 1997 .

[61]  J. Dutton,et al.  Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work , 2001 .

[62]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[63]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[64]  D. Tjosvold Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. , 1997 .

[65]  R. Heslin PREDICTING GROUP TASK EFFECTIVENESS FROM MEMBER CHARACTERISTICS. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[67]  S. Rothmann,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[68]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[69]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[70]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look , 1989 .

[71]  Donald G. Morrison,et al.  Measurement Problems in Cluster Analysis , 1967 .

[72]  E. Molleman,et al.  Work Design Issues in Lean Production from a Sociotechnical Systems Perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the Next Step in Sociotechnical Design? , 1998 .

[73]  S. Parker,et al.  Production Teamworking: The Importance of Interdependence and Autonomy for Employee Strain and Satisfaction , 2000 .

[74]  Yi Li,et al.  Robust Tolerance for Ambiguity , 1994 .

[75]  Keebom Kang,et al.  Cross-Utilization of Workers Whose Capabilities Differ , 1999 .

[76]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[77]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[78]  Eric Molleman,et al.  Modalities of self-managing teams - The "must", "may", "can" and "will" of local decision making , 2000 .

[79]  Dexter Dunphy,et al.  Teams: Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance? , 1996 .

[80]  Janice L. Dreachslin,et al.  Workforce diversity: implications for the effectiveness of health care delivery teams. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[81]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .

[82]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[83]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  Managing worker flexibility and attrition in dual resource constrained job shops , 1995 .