Does an Incremental Filling Technique Reduce Polymerization Shrinkage Stresses?

It is widely accepted that volumetric contraction and solidification during the polymerization process of restorative composites in combination with bonding to the hard tissue result in stress transfer and inward deformation of the cavity walls of the restored tooth. Deformation of the walls decreases the size of the cavity during the filling process. This fact has a profound influence on the assumption-raised and discussed in this paper-that an incremental filling technique reduces the stress effect of composite shrinkage on the tooth. Developing stress fields for different incremental filling techniques are simulated in a numerical analysis. The analysis shows that, in a restoration with a well-established bond to the tooth-as is generally desired-incremental filling techniques increase the deformation of the restored tooth. The increase is caused by the incremental deformation of the preparation, which effectively decreases the total amount of composite needed to fill the cavity. This leads to a higher-stressed tooth-composite structure. The study also shows that the assessment of intercuspal distance measurements as well as simplifications based on generalization of the shrinkage stress state cannot be sufficient to characterize the effect of polymerization shrinkage in a tooth-restoration complex. Incremental filling methods may need to be retained for reasons such as densification, adaptation, thoroughness of cure, and bond formation. However, it is very difficult to prove that incrementalization needs to be retained because of the abatement of shrinkage effects.

[1]  W H Douglas,et al.  Strain gauge method for measuring polymerization contraction of composite restoratives. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  B. Smith,et al.  In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials , 1986, British Dental Journal.

[4]  E. K. Hansen Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[5]  A. Feilzer,et al.  True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  M Braden,et al.  Biophysics of the tooth. , 1976, Frontiers of oral physiology.

[7]  R. Lakes,et al.  Interferometric Measurements of Cusp Deformation of Teeth Restored with Composites , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[8]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[9]  D. Watts,et al.  Temperature-dependence of Compressive Properties of Human Dentin , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[10]  O. Gómez-Marín,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Effects of Dentinal Bonding Agents and Application Techniques on Marginal Gaps in Class V Cavities , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[11]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: modelling and analysis. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  A. H. Tjan,et al.  Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  I Krejci,et al.  Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[14]  G. Paffenbarger,et al.  Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. , 1960, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  G C PAFFENBARGER,et al.  Determination of some compressive properties of human enamel and dentin. , 1958, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  A. Segura,et al.  In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  J. Reddy An introduction to the finite element method , 1989 .

[18]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  J. H. Lai,et al.  Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  R. Lakes,et al.  Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[22]  R DeLong,et al.  Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .