Social identity formation during the emergence of the occupy movement

The Occupy movement made a series of local ‘sit-ins’ in cities across the world in response to financial and political injustices. Prior to the movement's emergence, the Internet provided a transnational forum for people across the world to discuss their opinions and coalesce about the financial and political contexts. Here, we analyse 5343 posts on the ‘#OccupyWallStreet’ Facebook event page to identify linguistic markers of shared social identity formation. Results suggest that discussants formed a shared identity if they agreed on both the desired change (the injunctive norm, ‘revoke corporate personhood’) and the predefined action (Occupy Wall Street). Lines of consensus and dissensus on injunctive norms and actions delineated the development of both affirmational in-group and negational out-group identities. We conclude that online discussion can create both in-groups and out-groups through (in)validating ideas about social reformation and delineating shared psychological spaces.

[1]  M. Scholten,et al.  Action! , 2017, Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.

[2]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  "We must be the change we want to see in the world": integrating norms and identities through social interaction , 2015 .

[3]  Avelie Stuart,et al.  Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity , 2015 .

[4]  J. Gavin,et al.  Navigating Psychological Ethics in Shared Multi‐User Online Environments , 2015 .

[5]  Megan A. Moreno,et al.  Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  C. McGarty,et al.  Aspirations for a cooperative community and support for mental health advocacy: a shared orientation through opinion‐based group membership , 2013 .

[7]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[8]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs , 2012 .

[9]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  The power of talk: developing discriminatory group norms through discussion. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  Shaping stereotypical behaviour through the discussion of social stereotypes. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[11]  M. Zimmer “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[12]  Cristina Flesher Fominaya,et al.  Creating cohesion from diversity: the challenge of collective identity formation in the global justice movement. , 2010, Sociological inquiry.

[13]  Jinguang Zhang,et al.  Self-Enhancement on a Self-Categorization Leash: Evidence for a Dual-Process Model of First- and Third-Person Perceptions , 2010 .

[14]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[15]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  N. Hopkins,et al.  Reconceptualizing 'extremism' and 'moderation': from categories of analysis to categories of practice in the construction of collective identity. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[18]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Dominic J. Packer,et al.  On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[21]  Richard B. Slatcher,et al.  Linguistic markers of psychological state through media interviews: John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004, Al Gore in 2000 , 2005 .

[22]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation , 2005 .

[23]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Mario Diani,et al.  Social Movements and Networks , 2003 .

[25]  H. Haste,et al.  Constructing the Citizen , 2002 .

[26]  J. Drury,et al.  Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[27]  F Sani,et al.  Contested identities and schisms in groups: opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  F. Sani,et al.  Identity, Argument and Schism: Two Longitudinal Studies of the Split in the Church of England over the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood , 1999 .

[29]  Andreas H. Jucker,et al.  Discourse markers : descriptions and theory , 1998 .

[30]  F. Sani,et al.  When consensus fails: an analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991) , 1998 .

[31]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[32]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[33]  Luk Van Langenhove,et al.  Varieties of Positioning , 1991 .

[34]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[35]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[36]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[37]  M. Castells ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[38]  T. Buchanan,et al.  Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research , 2013 .

[39]  A. Melucci The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements , 2011 .

[40]  Ana-Maria Bliuc,et al.  Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action , 2007 .

[41]  Mark Levine,et al.  Saving Bulgaria's Jews : An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity , 2006 .

[42]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[43]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .

[44]  Carl J. Mayer,et al.  Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights , 1990 .

[45]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[46]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Negational Categorization and Intergroup Behavior , 2022 .