Active Decoupling of Transmit and Receive Coils for Full-Duplex MRI.

Objective: Concurrent excitation and acquisition in MRI is a method to acquire MRI signal from tissues with very short transverse relaxation time. Since transmit power is many orders of magnitude larger than receive signal, a weak coupling dominates the MR signal during CEA. Thus, appropriate decoupling between transmit and receive coils is required. In this study, two controllable decoupling designs are investigated for achieving isolation between coils. Methods: A modified version of isolation concept used in the full-duplex radios in communication systems is applied to acquire MRI signal using CEA. In our new method, a small copy of RF transmit signal is attenuated and delayed to generate the same coupling signal which is available in the receiver coil. Then it is subtracted from the receive signal to detect the MRI signal. The proposed decoupling method is developed and implemented in two designs: Semi-Automatic and Fully-Automatic Controllable Decoupling Designs. Results: Using Semi-Automatic Controllable Decoupling Design, decoupling of more than 75 dB is achieved. Fully-Automatic Controllable Decoupling Design provides more than 100 dB decoupling between coils which is good enough for detecting MRI signals during excitation from tissues with very short transverse relaxation time. Conclusion: This study shows feasibility of applying full duplex electronics to decouple transmit and receive coils for CEA in a clinical MRI system. Significance: These designs can automatically tune the cancellation circuit and it is a potential tool for recovering signal from tissues with very short T2 in clinical MR systems with a minor hardware modification.

[1]  Andrew J Fagan,et al.  Development of a 3-D, multi-nuclear continuous wave NMR imaging system. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[2]  Markus Weiger,et al.  MRI with Zero Echo Time , 2012 .

[3]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Full duplex radios , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[4]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  William A. Edelstein,et al.  4825162 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging with multiple surface coils , 1989 .

[6]  W. W. Hansen,et al.  The Nuclear Induction Experiment , 1946 .

[7]  G. Bydder,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Short T 2 Components in Tissue , 2002 .

[8]  J. Ferretti,et al.  Rapid scan Fourier transform NMR spectroscopy , 1974 .

[9]  Ergin Atalar,et al.  RF EXCITATION USING A TRANSMIT ARRAY SYSTEM , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Garwood,et al.  Continuous SWIFT. , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Yuanan Liu,et al.  Closed‐form design method for unequal lumped‐elements Wilkinson power dividers , 2009 .

[12]  Andrew J Fagan,et al.  Continuous wave MRI of heterogeneous materials. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[13]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  An 8 Channel Transmit Coil for Transmit Sense at 3T , 2006 .

[14]  Michael Bock,et al.  Active decoupling of RF coils using a transmit array system , 2015, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Fernando G. Noriega,et al.  Designing LC Wilkinson power splitters , 2002 .

[16]  A. Caprihan,et al.  Transforming NMR data despite missing points. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  Markus Weiger,et al.  MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Arvind Caprihan,et al.  Imaging lungs using inert fluorinated gases , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Matthew D Robson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging with ultrashort TE (UTE) PULSE sequences: Technical considerations , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Jing Yuan,et al.  Interconnecting L/C components for decoupling and its application to low‐field open MRI array , 2007 .

[21]  W. Barber,et al.  Comparison of linear and circular polarization for magnetic resonance imaging , 1985 .

[22]  Maryam Salim,et al.  Full-duplex MRI for zero TE imaging , 2016 .