A review of salient elements defining team collaboration in paediatric rehabilitation

Objective: To explicate the complex process of team collaboration and identify salient elements of team collaboration in paediatric rehabilitation. Data sources: After an initial search to define key features of team collaboration a systematic search on team collaboration and the key features was executed to identify salient elements. The systematic search was carried out in Index Medicus (MEDLINE), Educational Resource Information Clearinghouse (ERIC) and American Psychological Association (Psyc INFO) covering the period from January 1993 to December 2004. Review methods: Based on title and abstract relevant publications were identified and qualitatively assessed by two reviewers. To facilitate the interpretation of the salient elements, the articles were also classified according to the criteria ‘participants and setting’ and ‘research method’. Results: Of the total of 930 identified publications 28 studies proved eligible and were subsequently assessed. The evaluation yielded 29 salient elements defining five key features of team collaboration (i.e. communication, decision making, goal setting, organization and team process). Parent involvement proved to play a dominant role and was mentioned in relation to all five features. Conclusions: Based on the results, rather than an underlying element, it is proposed to consider parent involvement as the sixth feature of team collaboration. The 29 distinctive elements of teamwork could be useful as a guideline and checklist for empirical studies and may help enhance multidisciplinary collaboration in paediatric care. However, additional exploratory research focusing on the way these elements interact with each other and the key features and whether they facilitate or restrict team collaboration is warranted.

[1]  R. Warren,et al.  Bridging the "med-ed gap" for students with special health care needs: a model school liaison program. , 1995, The Journal of school health.

[2]  M. Stepans,et al.  The role of the nurse on a transdisciplinary early intervention assessment team. , 2002, Public health nursing.

[3]  Maria L. Nahmias Communication and Collaboration Between Home and School for Students with ADD , 1995 .

[4]  M. Larsson Organising habilitation services: team structures and family participation. , 2000, Child: care, health and development.

[5]  B. Ogletree,et al.  Team-Based Service Delivery for Students with Disabilities , 2001 .

[6]  E. Roelofsen,et al.  Team conferences in paediatric rehabilitation: organization, satisfaction and aspects eligible for improvement , 2000, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[7]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Team Collaboration: A Case Study of an Early Intervention Team , 2001, Qualitative health research.

[8]  Conceptual, Theoretical, and Practical Approaches to the Development of Interdisciplinary Teams: A Transactional Model. , 1994 .

[9]  R. Simeonsson,et al.  Family involvement in multidisciplinary team evaluation: professional and parent perspectives. , 1995, Child: care, health and development.

[10]  P. Minchom,et al.  Models of parent partnership and child development centres. , 1991, Child: care, health and development.

[11]  P. Clark LEARNING FROM EDUCATION: WHAT THE TEAMWORK LITERATURE IN SPECIAL EDUCATION CAN TEACH GERONTOLOGISTS ABOUT TEAM TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[12]  R. Sands,et al.  The Missing Voice in Interdisciplinary Communication , 1993, Qualitative health research.

[13]  P. Gallagher,et al.  General Education Teachers' Attitudes and Perceptions of Teamwork Supporting Children with Developmental Concerns , 2001 .

[14]  C. Ward,et al.  Goal-setting in rehabilitation: report of a workshop to explore professionals' perceptions of goal-setting , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  M. Friend,et al.  Principles for the Practice of Collaboration in Schools , 1991 .

[16]  D. Rintala,et al.  The innovative rehabilitation team: an experiment in team building. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  L. Franck,et al.  Re-thinking family-centred care across the continuum of children's healthcare. , 2004, Child: care, health and development.

[18]  C. Royeen,et al.  The Impact of Culture and Socioeconomic Status on Family-Professional Collaboration: Challenges and Solutions , 1994 .

[19]  M Yerbury,et al.  Issues in multidisciplinary teamwork for children with disabilities. , 1997, Child: care, health and development.

[20]  C. Mattingly,et al.  The complexities embedded in family-centered care. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  J. Case-Smith,et al.  The effect of occupational therapy intervention on mothers of children with cerebral palsy. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  K. Barnes,et al.  Team collaborative practices between teachers and occupational therapists. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[23]  C. Dunst,et al.  Enabling and Empowering Families: Conceptual and Intervention Issues , 2019 .

[24]  H J Stam,et al.  Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[25]  Karen Pierce,et al.  Meeting the ADD Challenge , 1995 .

[26]  Lisa Ellen Monda-Amaya,et al.  Process Variables Critical for Team Effectiveness , 2001 .

[27]  L. von Wendt,et al.  Teamwork in Swedish neuropaediatric habilitation. , 2000, Child: care, health and development.

[28]  Tina M. Smith,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OF CHILD FUNCTIONING , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[29]  R. Depompei,et al.  Working with families after TBI: A family‐centered approach , 1994 .

[30]  R. Gordon,et al.  Team approaches to treating children with disabilities: a comparison. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Dockrell,et al.  Naturalistic decision-making task processes in multiprofessional assessment of disability , 2001 .

[32]  S. Berman,et al.  Assessment training and team functioning for treating children with disabilities. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  A. Bakheit,et al.  Effective teamwork in rehabilitation , 1996, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[34]  L. Bouter,et al.  Development and implementation of the Rehabilitation Activities Pro” le for children: impact on the rehabilitation team , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[35]  J. Squires,et al.  Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. , 1997, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[36]  S. Hostler Pediatric family-centered rehabilitation. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[37]  E. Crais Families and professionals as collaborators in assessment , 1993 .

[38]  Gillian King,et al.  Family-Centred Service , 1998 .

[39]  Susan Ryan-Vincek From Theory to Practice: A Pilot Study of Team Members' Perspectives on Transdisciplinary Service Delivery. , 1995 .