Hydrological validation of a radar-based nowcasting technique

Nowcasting precipitation is a key element in the anticipation of floods in warning systems. In this framework, weather radars are very useful because of the high resolution of their measurements both in time and space. The aim of this study is to assess the performance of a recently proposed nowcasting technique (S-PROG) from a hydrological point of view in a Mediterranean environment. S-PROG is based on the advection of weather radar fields according to the motion field derived with an algorithm based on tracking radar echoes by correlation (TREC), and it has the ability of filtering out the most unpredictable scales of these fields as the forecasting time increases. Validation of this nowcasting technique was done from two different perspectives: (i) comparing forecasted precipitation fields against radar measurements, and (ii) by means of a distributed rainfall runoff model, comparing hydrographs simulated with a hydrological model using rainfall fields forecasted by S-PROG against hydrographs generated with the model using the entire series of radar measurements. In both cases, results obtained by a simpler nowcasting technique are used as a reference to evaluate improvements. Validation showed that precipitation fields forecasted with S-PROG seem to be better than fields forecasted using simpler techniques. Additionally, hydrological validation led the authors to point out that the use of radar-based nowcasting techniques allows the anticipation window in which flow estimates are forecasted with enough quality to be sensibly extended.

[1]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  On the use of real‐time radar rainfall estimates for flood prediction in mountainous basins , 2000 .

[2]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model , 1991 .

[3]  L. R. Ahuja,et al.  Infiltration and soil water movement , 1992 .

[4]  Marco Borga,et al.  Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation , 2002 .

[5]  K. Georgakakos,et al.  On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use , 2001 .

[6]  Hervé Andrieu,et al.  Simulation of Radar Mountain Returns Using a Digitized Terrain Model , 1995 .

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data , 1994 .

[8]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling , 1995 .

[9]  L. Li,et al.  Nowcasting of Motion and Growth of Precipitation with Radar over a Complex Orography , 1995 .

[10]  I. Zawadzki,et al.  Scale Dependence of the Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part II: Probability Forecasts , 2004 .

[11]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  On the simulation of infiltration‐ and saturation‐excess runoff using radar‐based rainfall estimates: Effects of algorithm uncertainty and pixel aggregation , 1998 .

[12]  9A.3 A MODEL TO GENERATE STOCHASTIC NOWCASTS OF RAINFALL , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel Sempere-Torres,et al.  Use of Weather Radar for Combined Sewer Overflows Monitoring and Control , 1999 .

[14]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[15]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff model sensitivity to radar rainfall resolution , 1994 .

[16]  H. Andrieu,et al.  FLASH FLOOD FORECASTING WITH COUPLED PRECIPITATION MODEL IN MOUNTAINOUS MEDITERRANEAN BASIN , 2001 .

[17]  Evaluation of a conceptual distributed rainfall-runoff model in the Bes` os catchment in Catalunya using radar information , 2002 .

[18]  A. Seed A Dynamic and Spatial Scaling Approach to Advection Forecasting , 2001 .

[19]  Georges-Marie Saulnier,et al.  Hydrologic Visibility of Weather Radar Systems Operating in Mountainous Regions: Case Study for the Ardèche Catchment (France) , 2002 .

[20]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  On the influence of the spatial distribution of rainfall on storm runoff , 1979 .

[21]  Isztar Zawadzki,et al.  Forecasting of hourly accumulations of precipitation by optimal extrapolation of radar maps , 1994 .

[22]  J. Gourley,et al.  A HYDROLOGIC APPROACH TO EVALUATING QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES , 2003 .

[23]  J. Smith,et al.  Hydrologic modeling of extreme floods using radar rainfall estimates , 2003 .

[24]  R. Rinehart,et al.  Three-dimensional storm motion detection by conventional weather radar , 1978, Nature.

[25]  Paul O'Connell,et al.  Modelling the effects of spatial variability in rainfall on catchment response. 2. Experiments with distributed and lumped models , 1996 .

[26]  J. M. Porrà,et al.  Experimental evidence of a general description for raindrop size distribution properties , 1998 .

[27]  Rafael L. Bras,et al.  Use of Weather Radar for Flood Forecasting in the Sieve River Basin: A Sensitivity Analysis , 1993 .

[28]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Nowcasting Thunderstorms: A Status Report , 1998 .

[29]  Xudong Sun,et al.  Flood estimation using radar and raingauge data , 2000 .

[30]  I. Zawadzki,et al.  Scale-Dependence of the Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part I: Description of the Methodology , 2002 .

[31]  Herbert Lang,et al.  Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model , 2002 .

[32]  J. E. Nash,et al.  The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph , 1957 .

[33]  R. Bras,et al.  Hydrologic modeling Of New England river basins using radar rainfall data , 1990 .

[34]  Philip B. Bedient,et al.  Assessing urban hydrologic prediction accuracy through event reconstruction , 2004 .

[35]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[36]  Marc Berenguer Ferrer,et al.  Improving radar rainfall measurement stability using mountain returns in real time. , 2003 .