Does landscape related expertise influence the visual perception of landscape photographs? : implications for participatory landscape planning and management

Abstract Does expertise in landscape related issues influence the way landscapes are observed? In an eye tracking experiment 21 landscape experts and 21 laymen were asked to observe 74 landscape photographs, each for 10 s. Experts seemed to make significantly more fixations and saccades, had a longer scan path and a larger visual span than the laymen. As a consequence, in the same amount of time, experts visually explored the landscape photographs to a wider extent and in a more global and holistic fashion. This is probably due to the presence of expertise, which seemed to enhance efficient information extraction, enabling experts to interpret and understand the landscapes more easily. In contrast, the laymen's visual exploration of the landscapes was considerably more restricted as they spent significantly more time and attention to singular objects, in particular to buildings. This behaviour may be a result of the lack of expertise, which makes longer fixation times necessary to understand the meaning of the composing landscape elements. A slower information processing leaves less time to visually explore the landscape photograph and hampers laymen to observe the landscape as a whole. Consequently, experts and laymen may not perceive the same features in a landscape and might not even see the same landscape. This conclusion is important for participatory landscape management in which experts and laymen are asked to visually assess landscapes. The often diverging assessments of both groups could partially be explained by their literally different view on landscapes, on which their judgement is based.

[1]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Strategies of Visual Search by Novice and Experienced Drivers , 1972 .

[2]  E. Krupinski,et al.  The Role of Formal Art Training on Perception and Aesthetic Judgment of Art Compositions , 2017 .

[3]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Tracking Restorative Components: Patterns in Eye Movements as a Consequence of a Restorative Rating Task , 2013 .

[4]  R A Abrams,et al.  Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements: characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Helena Nordh,et al.  Identifying Cues of Stewardship in Everyday Landscapes Using Eye Tracking , 2010 .

[7]  G Underwood,et al.  Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver , 2007, Ergonomics.

[8]  J. Sandberg,et al.  The think aloud method , 1994 .

[9]  E. Strumse DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES IN THE VISUAL PREFERENCES FOR AGRARIAN LANDSCAPES IN WESTERN NORWAY , 1996 .

[10]  Paul M. Fitts,et al.  Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. , 1950 .

[11]  W. Stewart,et al.  Community identities as visions for landscape change , 2004 .

[12]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Chapter 2 – Definition and Computation of Oculomotor Measures in the Study of Cognitive Processes , 1998 .

[13]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Perceiving patterns in dynamic action sequences: Investigating the processes underpinning stimulus recognition and anticipation skill , 2009 .

[14]  Bryan Found,et al.  Visual Attention and Expertise for Forensic Signature Analysis , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[16]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups , 2005 .

[17]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  Comparing the attitudes of local residents, planners, and developers about preserving rural character in New England , 2006 .

[18]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  Visual impact evaluation of a wind park in a Greek island , 2009 .

[19]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  The Visual Environment: Public Participation in Design and Planning , 1989 .

[20]  Lars Brabyn,et al.  Landscape classification using GIS and national digital databases , 1996 .

[21]  P. Selman Planning at the Landscape Scale , 2006 .

[22]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[23]  Ignace T C Hooge,et al.  A quantitative measure for the uniformity of fixation density: The Voronoi method , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[24]  J. Nassauer Cultural Sustainability: Aligning Aesthetics and Ecology , 1997 .

[25]  Elwood L. Shafer,et al.  A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes , 1974 .

[26]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Perceptual Landscape Simulations: History and Prospect , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[27]  I. Biederman Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effect of background information on object identification. , 1989 .

[29]  Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester,et al.  Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms , 2009 .

[30]  Gérald Domon,et al.  An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: Landscape values in areas of intensive agricultural use , 2009 .

[31]  G. Underwood,et al.  Something Overlooked? How experts in change detection use visual saliency , 2010 .

[32]  F. Luz Participatory landscape ecology: A basis for acceptance and implementation , 2000 .

[33]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for briefly presented pictures: the time course of rapid forgetting. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: a failure to find a benefit from prior expectancy or familiarity. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[36]  T. Jung,et al.  Combined eye activity measures accurately estimate changes in sustained visual task performance , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[37]  R. Wal,et al.  Shared appreciation of woodland landscapes by land management professionals and lay people: An exploration through field-based interactive photo-elicitation , 2011 .

[38]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  S. Massaccesi,et al.  Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis , 2008 .

[40]  Simon Bell,et al.  Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests , 2001 .

[41]  M. Mohamadian,et al.  Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking , 1996 .

[42]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison , 2003 .

[43]  S. Dakin There's more to landscape than meets the eye: towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management , 2003 .

[44]  Derek T. Y. Mann,et al.  Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[45]  E. Krupinski,et al.  Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[46]  P. Chapman,et al.  Visual Search of Driving Situations: Danger and Experience , 1998, Perception.

[47]  Y. Luginbühl,et al.  Landscape : from knowledge to action , 2008 .

[48]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[49]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Altamont: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape , 1987 .

[50]  C. Blehm,et al.  Computer vision syndrome: a review. , 2005, Survey of ophthalmology.

[51]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation , 1999 .

[52]  A. Scott Assessing Public Perception of Landscape: The LANDMAP experience , 2002 .

[53]  Jörg Schorer,et al.  Visual span and change detection in soccer: An expertise study , 2011 .

[54]  Marc Antrop,et al.  Eye-tracking Analysis in Landscape Perception Research: Influence of Photograph Properties and Landscape Characteristics , 2014 .

[55]  Jari Laarni,et al.  Searching Information from Screen Maps , 2003, ScanGIS.

[56]  C. Koch,et al.  Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[57]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research : Ready to deliver the promises , 2002 .

[58]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[59]  J. F. Coeterier A photo validity test , 1983 .

[60]  Landscape planning: a conceptual perspective , 1986 .

[61]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  Teresa Pinto-Correia,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Centrally Defined Policies and Local Decisions – Towards more Sensitive and Creative Rural Landscape Management , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[63]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[64]  Marjanne Sevenant,et al.  Variation in landscape perception and preference: experiences from case studies in rural and urban landscapes observed by different groups of respondents , 2010 .

[65]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[66]  G. Tress,et al.  Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning—a study from Denmark , 2003 .

[67]  Mirjam de Groot,et al.  Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes , 2012 .

[68]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  David J. Manning,et al.  Learning from others: effects of viewing another person's eye movements while searching for chest nodules , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[70]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  N. Charness,et al.  Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence From Eye Movements , 2001, Psychological science.

[72]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[73]  Svein Magnussen,et al.  Expertise in Pictorial Perception: Eye-Movement Patterns and Visual Memory in Artists and Laymen , 2007, Perception.

[74]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Incorporating people's perception into landscape planning: ethical challenges in dealing with diversity of opinion within a community. , 2009 .

[75]  Andrew Lothian,et al.  Scenic Perceptions of the Visual Effects of Wind Farms on South Australian Landscapes , 2008 .

[76]  E. Conant,et al.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. , 2007, Radiology.

[77]  J. Stern,et al.  Time on task and blink effects on saccade duration. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[78]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[79]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[80]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Chapter 23 – Eye Tracking in Usability Evaluation: A Practitioner's Guide , 2003 .

[81]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[82]  A. Scott,et al.  What kind of landscape do we want? past, present and future perspectives , 2005 .

[83]  Panagiotis Konstantopoulos,et al.  Investigating drivers' visual search strategies : towards an efficient training intervention , 2009 .

[84]  James F. Palmer,et al.  Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments , 2001 .