Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring

Estimating population-level effects of a vaccine is challenging because there may be interference, i.e., the outcome of one individual may depend on the vaccination status of another individual. Partial interference occurs when individuals can be partitioned into groups such that interference occurs only within groups. In the absence of interference, inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators are commonly used to draw inference about causal effects of an exposure or treatment. Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele (2012) proposed a modified IPW estimator for causal effects in the presence of partial interference. Motivated by a cholera vaccine study in Bangladesh, this paper considers an extension of the Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele IPW estimator to the setting where the outcome is subject to right censoring using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). Censoring weights are estimated using proportional hazards frailty models. The large sample properties of the IPCW estimators are derived, and simulation studies are presented demonstrating the estimators' performance in finite samples. The methods are then used to analyze data from the cholera vaccine study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[2]  Oleg Sofrygin,et al.  Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population , 2016, Journal of causal inference.

[3]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Assessing effects of cholera vaccination in the presence of interference , 2014, Biometrics.

[5]  Corwin M Zigler,et al.  Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs , 2017, Biometrics.

[6]  M E Halloran,et al.  Study designs for dependent happenings. , 1991, Epidemiology.

[7]  Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  Auto-G-Computation of Causal Effects on a Network , 2017, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[8]  Federico Rotolo,et al.  parfm: Parametric Frailty Models in R , 2012 .

[9]  Andrea Rotnitzky,et al.  Analysis of failure time data under competing censoring mechanisms , 2007 .

[10]  David R. Cox Planning of Experiments , 1958 .

[11]  Ira M Longini,et al.  Epidemic and endemic cholera trends over a 33-year period in Bangladesh. , 2002, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  J. Robins,et al.  Correcting for Noncompliance and Dependent Censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) Log‐Rank Tests , 2000, Biometrics.

[13]  Michael Emch,et al.  The Role of Vaccine Coverage within Social Networks in Cholera Vaccine Efficacy , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  J. Aislinn Bohren,et al.  Optimal Design of Experiments in the Presence of Interference , 2017, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[15]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy , 2006 .

[16]  L. Stefanski,et al.  The Calculus of M-Estimation , 2002 .

[17]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  A new approach to hierarchical data analysis: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for the causal effect of a cluster-level exposure , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  D. Sack,et al.  Herd immunity conferred by killed oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: a reanalysis , 2005, The Lancet.

[19]  Michael G Hudgens,et al.  The Calculus of M-Estimation in R with geex. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[20]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  On causal inference in the presence of interference , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  M. Hudgens,et al.  On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference , 2016, Biometrika.

[22]  Rui Wang,et al.  Accounting for interactions and complex inter‐subject dependency in estimating treatment effect in cluster‐randomized trials with missing outcomes , 2015, Biometrics.

[23]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Causal inference from observational studies with clustered interference, with application to a cholera vaccine study , 2017, 1711.04834.

[24]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? , 2006 .

[25]  Dean Eckles,et al.  Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  David L. Kaplan Causal Inference for Observational Studies. , 2018, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[27]  P. Rosenbaum Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments , 2007 .

[28]  Mohammad Ali,et al.  Doubly robust estimation in observational studies with partial interference , 2018, Stat.

[29]  Wen Wei Loh,et al.  Randomization inference with general interference and censoring , 2018, Biometrics.