Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera‐trap data

The rapid improvement of camera traps in recent decades has revolutionized biodiversity monitoring. Despite clear applications in conservation science, camera traps have seldom been used to model the abundance of unmarked animal populations. We sought to summarize the challenges facing abundance estimation of unmarked animals, compile an overview of existing analytical frameworks, and provide guidance for practitioners seeking a suitable method. When a camera records multiple detections of an unmarked animal, one cannot determine whether the images represent multiple mobile individuals or a single individual repeatedly entering the camera viewshed. Furthermore, animal movement obfuscates a clear definition of the sampling area and, as a result, the area to which an abundance estimate corresponds. Recognizing these challenges, we identified 6 analytical approaches and reviewed 927 camera-trap studies published from 2014 to 2019 to assess the use and prevalence of each method. Only about 5% of the studies used any of the abundance-estimation methods we identified. Most of these studies estimated local abundance or covariate relationships rather than predicting abundance or density over broader areas. Next, for each analytical approach, we compiled the data requirements, assumptions, advantages, and disadvantages to help practitioners navigate the landscape of abundance estimation methods. When seeking an appropriate method, practitioners should evaluate the life history of the focal taxa, carefully define the area of the sampling frame, and consider what types of data collection are possible. The challenge of estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations persists; although multiple methods exist, no one method is optimal for camera-trap data under all circumstances. As analytical frameworks continue to evolve and abundance estimation of unmarked animals becomes increasingly common, camera traps will become even more important for informing conservation decision-making.

[1]  Samuel T. Turvey,et al.  Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition , 2008 .

[2]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera Traps in Animal Ecology , 2011 .

[3]  F. Barraquand,et al.  Sensitivity of binomial N‐mixture models to overdispersion: The importance of assessing model fit , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[4]  J. Andrew Royle.  N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts , 2004, Biometrics.

[5]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Evaluating and integrating spatial capture–recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability , 2020, bioRxiv.

[6]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Trap Configuration and Spacing Influences Parameter Estimates in Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[8]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[9]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  Tal Avgar,et al.  Density‐dependent space use affects interpretation of camera trap detection rates , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  Marco Sciaini,et al.  NLMR and landscapetools: An integrated environment for simulating and modifying neutral landscape models in R , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[12]  Shun Hongo,et al.  Landscape-scale estimation of forest ungulate density and biomass using camera traps: Applying the REST model , 2020 .

[13]  Oliver R. Wearn,et al.  Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[14]  P. Caley,et al.  Estimating population density from presence–absence data using a spatially explicit model , 2015 .

[15]  Paul M. Lukacs,et al.  Three novel methods to estimate abundance of unmarked animals using remote cameras , 2018, Ecosphere.

[16]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Biodiversity of man-made open habitats in an underused country: a class of multispecies abundance models for count data , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Estimating Animal Abundance , 2002 .

[18]  Estimation of population density of European pine marten in central Italy using camera trapping , 2012, Acta Theriologica.

[19]  Brett T McClintock,et al.  A spatial mark--resight model augmented with telemetry data. , 2013, Ecology.

[20]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial capture–recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture–recapture , 2019, Ecosphere.

[21]  J. Fisher,et al.  The importance of considering multiple interacting species for conservation of species at risk , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania , 2015, The Journal of wildlife management.

[23]  Andreas Wilting,et al.  Risky business or simple solution – Relative abundance indices from camera-trapping , 2013 .

[24]  J. Peterson,et al.  Fitting N-mixture models to count data with unmodeled heterogeneity: Bias, diagnostics, and alternative approaches , 2018 .

[25]  John P. Volpe,et al.  Estimating density for species conservation: Comparing camera trap spatial count models to genetic spatial capture-recapture models , 2018, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[26]  Lorenzo Quaglietta,et al.  SiMRiv: an R package for mechanistic simulation of individual, spatially-explicit multistate movements in rivers, heterogeneous and homogeneous spaces incorporating landscape bias , 2019, Movement Ecology.

[27]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Modelling community dynamics based on species‐level abundance models from detection/nondetection data , 2011 .

[28]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[29]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  Estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations: accounting for imperfect detection and other sources of zero inflation , 2015 .

[30]  L. Madsen,et al.  Models for Estimating Abundance from Repeated Counts of an Open Metapopulation , 2011, Biometrics.

[31]  Hugh S. Robinson,et al.  Sampling design and analytical advances allow for simultaneous density estimation of seven sympatric carnivore species from camera trap data , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[32]  Neil Reid,et al.  An invasive‐native mammalian species replacement process captured by camera trap survey random encounter models , 2016 .

[33]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[34]  P. Acevedo,et al.  Spatial mark-resight models to estimate feral pig population density , 2017 .

[35]  P. Jansen,et al.  A simple method for estimating the effective detection distance of camera traps , 2017 .

[36]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes , 2015 .

[37]  Francesco Rovero,et al.  Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates , 2009 .

[38]  Sarah P. Saunders,et al.  Dynamic N-occupancy models: estimating demographic rates and local abundance from detection-nondetection data. , 2016, Ecology.

[39]  C. Boesch,et al.  Validating camera trap distance sampling for chimpanzees , 2019, American journal of primatology.

[40]  T. A. Rittenhouse,et al.  Evaluating spatially explicit density estimates of unmarked wildlife detected by remote cameras , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[41]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Distance sampling with camera traps , 2017 .

[42]  Douglas H. Johnson.  In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys , 2008 .

[43]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Accounting for non‐independent detection when estimating abundance of organisms with a Bayesian approach , 2011 .

[44]  Sarah P. Saunders,et al.  Synthesizing multiple data types for biological conservation using integrated population models , 2018 .

[45]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[46]  Michael Schaub,et al.  Integrated population models: a novel analysis framework for deeper insights into population dynamics , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[47]  H. Samejima,et al.  Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps , 2018 .

[48]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations , 2011, 1112.3250.

[49]  Graham W. Taylor,et al.  Past, present and future approaches using computer vision for animal re‐identification from camera trap data , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[50]  Matthew R. Schofield,et al.  On the robustness of N-mixture models. , 2018, Ecology.

[51]  Matthew R. Schofield,et al.  On the reliability of N‐mixture models for count data , 2018, Biometrics.