Citizen Involvement and Performance Management in Special-Purpose Governments

Performance management and citizen participation are being used by local governments to improve government accountability and responsiveness. In some cases, local governments are integrating these two trends. One area of local government in which this trend has not been assessed is special districts. Th is paper uses data from a study of nine special districts in the state of Texas to fi ll this void. To assess citizen participation in performance management among the districts, we interviewed district managers, analyzed minutes from governing board meetings, and conducted citizen focus groups in three regions of the state. Our fi ndings suggest that although districts may not yet be in tune with the latest performance management trends, they are making eff orts to engage citizens in other ways. We recommend ways that districts can build on these experiences and more eff ectively incorporate citizens in the development, analysis, and reporting of performance measures.

[1]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington , 2002 .

[2]  M. Harmon.  Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government , 1995 .

[3]  V. Ostrom,et al.  The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerabilities of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville's Challenge , 1991 .

[4]  N. Roberts.  Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation , 2004 .

[5]  B. Rosenberg,et al.  Democracy in America , 1961 .

[6]  D. Moynihan.  Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement “Managing for Results” Reforms? , 2004 .

[7]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[8]  M. Kweit,et al.  Citizen Participation and Citizen Evaluation in Disaster Recovery , 2004 .

[9]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure , 1993, Policy Sciences.

[10]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[11]  H. Schachter.  Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: Two Models for Improving Government Performance , 1995 .

[12]  Kathryn Ann Foster,et al.  The Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government , 1997 .

[13]  Michele Claibourn,et al.  Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital , 2000 .

[14]  Kathleen E. Halvorsen,et al.  An Evaluation of Three Democratic, Community-Based Approaches to Citizen Participation: Surveys, Conversations With Community Groups, and Community Dinners , 2001 .

[15]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering , 2000 .

[16]  J. C. Bollens,et al.  Special District Governments in the United States , 2023 .

[17]  Richard C. Box.  Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities Into the 21st Century , 1997 .

[18]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[19]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[20]  Evan M. Berman,et al.  Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform , 2000 .

[21]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[22]  J. C. Thomas.  Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers , 1995 .

[23]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  Keeping Public Officials Accountable through Dialogue: Resolving the Accountability Paradox , 2002 .