An evaluation of European airlines’ operational performance

This paper uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the operational performance of a sample of AEA--Association of European Airlines from 2000 to 2005, combining operational and financial variables. In this paper an innovative DEA two-stage procedure proposed by Simar and Wilson [2007. Estimation and inference in two stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. Journal of Econometrics 136, 31-64] is used. In the first stage a DEA model is used to rank the airlines by their overall efficiency. In the second stage a bootstrapped truncated regression is used to evaluate the drivers of efficiency. The regressions test the roles played, respectively, by population and network alliance in the efficiency of the airlines. The implications of this research for managerial purposes are then drawn.

[1]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  Airline efficiency differences between Europe and the US: Implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation , 1995 .

[2]  Paul Clyde.  Do institutional shareholders police management , 1997 .

[3]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[4]  Zhiqiang Liu,et al.  Productivity Growth and Firm Ownership: An Analytical and Empirical Investigation , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Valentin Zelenyuk,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm’s Efficiency: The Case of a Transitional Country, Ukraine , 2006 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[7]  Chenjie Yu,et al.  A PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISON OF THE WORLD'S MAJOR AIRLINES. IN: AIR TRANSPORT , 1995 .

[8]  Paul W. Bauer,et al.  Decomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, nonconstant returns to scale, and technological progress , 1990 .

[9]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[10]  Pablo Coto-Millán,et al.  Liberalisation and efficiency in international air transport , 2006 .

[11]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[12]  Patrick Petit,et al.  Introducing regulation in the measurement of efficiency, with an application to the Canadian air carriers industry , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Technical Efficiency and Productivity Growth in an Era of Deregulation: the Case of Airlines , 1994 .

[14]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[17]  T. Coelli,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines , 1999 .

[18]  T. Coelli,et al.  A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators , 2003 .

[19]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Airline Deregulation: The Cost Pieces of the Puzzle , 1995 .

[20]  B. Park,et al.  A NOTE ON THE CONVERGENCE OF NONPARAMETRIC DEA ESTIMATORS FOR PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY SCORES , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[21]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[22]  Mark R. Greer.  Nothing focuses the mind on productivity quite like the fear of liquidation: Changes in airline productivity in the United States, 2000-2004 , 2008 .

[23]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[24]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Álvaro Costa,et al.  Airlines performance in the new market context: A comparative productivity and efficiency analysis. , 2008 .

[26]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  A nonlinear multivariate error components analysis of technology and specific factor productivity growth with an application to the U.S. Airlines , 1985 .

[27]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[28]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Production Frontiers and Panel Data: An Application to U.S. Class 1 Railroads , 1987 .

[29]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  Competition and market power in the European airline industry: 1976-90 , 1997 .

[30]  Renato Redondi,et al.  Pricing strategies of low-cost airlines: The Ryanair case study , 2009 .

[31]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  D. Giokas,et al.  A Study of the Relative Efficiency of Bank Branches: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[33]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  Allocative distortions and the regulatory transition of the U.S. airline industry , 1986 .

[34]  R. Raab,et al.  Identifying Subareas that Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency , 2002 .

[35]  Thomas G. Cowing,et al.  Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries , 1981 .

[36]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN AIRLINES UNDER REGULATED AND DEREGULATED ENVIRONMENTS , 1989 .

[37]  S. Perelman,et al.  Etude Comparative Des Performances Des Societes De Chemins De Fer , 1989 .

[38]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels , 1990 .

[39]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Continuity of measures of technical efficiency , 1990 .

[40]  Tae Hoon Oum,et al.  COST COMPETITIVENESS OF MAJOR AIRLINES: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON , 1998 .

[41]  Lars-Hendrik Röller,et al.  Efficiency and productivity growth comparisons of European and U.S. Air carriers: A first look at the data , 1993 .

[42]  Carl A. Scheraga,et al.  Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and Tobit analysis , 2004 .

[43]  S. Barrett.  Commercialising a national airline—the Aer Lingus case study , 2006 .

[44]  Nigel Dennis,et al.  End of the Free Lunch? the Responses of Traditional European Airlines to the Low-Cost Carrier Threat , 2007 .

[45]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[46]  H. Varian.  Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach , 1987 .

[47]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[48]  Ability to Recover Full Costs through Price Discrimination in Deregulated Scheduled Air Transport Markets , 2007 .

[49]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Flying into the Future: Air Transport Policy in the European Union , 1998 .

[50]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Extensions of Modified DEA , 1999 .

[51]  Meryem Duygun Fethi,et al.  European airlines: a stochastic DEA study of efficiency with market liberalisation , 2001 .

[52]  Fariba Alamdari,et al.  Impact of the adherence to the original low‐cost model on the profitability of low‐cost airlines , 2005 .

[53]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Applied data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[54]  Dipasis Bhadra,et al.  Race to the bottom or swimming upstream: Performance analysis of US airlines , 2008, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[55]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[56]  Rolf Färe,et al.  ON INVERSE HOMOTHETICITY , 1995 .

[57]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Distance Functions in Consumer and Producer Theory , 1998 .

[58]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[59]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ , 1984 .

[60]  Zinan Liu,et al.  Evidence on market structure of the deregulated US airline industry , 1999 .

[61]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[62]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Of Course We Can Bootstrap DEA Scores! But Does It Mean Anything? Logic Trumps Wishful Thinking , 1999 .

[63]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .