Party cohesion in presidential races: applying social network theory to the 2011 preprimary

In this paper we analyze individual contributions data from the 2012 Republican Party preprimary that was collected by the Federal Elections Commission (FEC). We use the basic principles of Social Network Analysis of multiple donors to discern patterns concerning presidential candidates and the Republican Party as a whole.

[1]  A. Ranney.  Turnout and Representation in Presidential Primary Elections , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Randall E. Adkins,et al.  Bumps in the Road to the White House , 2004 .

[3]  Christopher C. Hull.  Grassroots Rules: How the Iowa Caucus Helps Elect American Presidents , 2007 .

[4]  D. Shaw,et al.  Campaign Events, the Media and the Prospects of Victory: The 1992 and 1996 US Presidential Elections , 2000, British Journal of Political Science.

[5]  Does the Tail Wag the Dog? Early Presidential Nomination Polling in New Hampshire and the U.S. , 2008 .

[6]  B. Norrander.  Nomination Choices: Caucus and Primary Outcomes, 1976-88 , 1993 .

[7]  William G. Mayer.  In pursuit of the White House : how we choose our presidential nominees , 1996 .

[8]  Randall E. Adkins,et al.  Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts , 2005 .

[9]  Hans Noel,et al.  The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform , 2008 .

[10]  Paul-Henri Gurian.  Resource Allocation Strategies in Presidential Nomination Campaigns , 1986 .

[11]  Andrew Dowdle,et al.  The Viability Primary , 2009 .

[12]  Randall E. Adkins,et al.  The Money Primary: What Influences the Outcome of Pre‐Primary Presidential Nomination Fundraising? , 2002 .

[13]  E. Kamarck.  Primary Politics: How Presidential Candidates Have Shaped the Modern Nominating System , 2009 .

[14]  Larry M. Bartels.  Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice , 1988 .