Multi–domain Boundary Element Method in Acoustics

This chapter reviews the development and applications of the multi–domain boundary element method in acoustics. Early development of the method originated from the need for solving problems involving two or more acoustic media, as well as radiation and scattering from thin bodies. The concept of the multi–domain method may be simple, but real implementation could be tedious when one has to define many subdomains and match many interface boundary conditions. As new techniques for regularizing the hypersingular integral equation became more available in the early 1990’s, thin–body problems no longer required the multi–domain boundary element method. A so–called direct mixed–body boundary element method was also developed to handle a mix of regular and thin bodies. Later, problems involving two or more acoustic media could also be solved by an extension of the mixed– body concept. Nevertheless, the multi–domain boundary element still remains to be a viable choice today. When implemented in a modular way using the impedance matrix approach, the multi–domain boundary element method is very efficient and requires only a small amount of computer memory. Instead of being totally eliminated, the multi–domain boundary element method has actually become more powerful and easier to use when used in conjunction with the direct mixed–body boundary element method. Recent examples in muffler and silencer analysis are used to demonstrate the idea.

[1]  T W Wu,et al.  A direct mixed-body boundary element method for packed silencers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  Solving knife‐edge scattering problems using singular boundary elements , 1992 .

[3]  C.Y.R. Cheng,et al.  BOUNDARY ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF MUFFLERS WITH AN IMPROVED METHOD FOR DERIVING THE FOUR-POLE PARAMETERS , 1998 .

[4]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  The solution of coupled interior/exterior acoustic problems using the boundary element method , 1990 .

[5]  Hideo Utsuno,et al.  Prediction of sound fields in cavities with sound absorbing materials , 1990 .

[6]  L. Schmerr,et al.  Hypersingular Boundary Integral Equations: Some Applications in Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering , 1990 .

[7]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Muffler Performance Studies Using a Direct Mixed-Body Boundary Element Method and a Three-Point Method for Evaluating Transmission Loss , 1996 .

[8]  C.Y.R. Cheng,et al.  Boundary element analysis of packed silencers with a substructuring technique , 2003 .

[9]  Zhang Zhihua,et al.  Application of the Boundary Element Method to Predicting Acoustic Performance of Expansion Chamber Mufflers With Mean Flow , 1994 .

[10]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Boundary element analysis of packed silencers with protective cloth and embedded thin surfaces , 2003 .

[11]  Yih-Nan Chen,et al.  A boundary element analysis of a concentric-tube resonator , 1993 .

[12]  T. Terai On calculation of sound fields around three dimensional objects by integral equation methods , 1980 .

[13]  T. W. Wu A direct boundary element method for acoustic radiation and scattering from mixed regular and thin bodies , 1995 .

[14]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Boundary Element Analysis of Reactive Mufflers and Packed Silencers with Catalyst Converters , 2007 .

[15]  M. J. Crocker,et al.  Analysis of concentric‐tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities , 1978 .

[16]  Martin Ochmann,et al.  Boundary Element Acoustics Fundamentals and Computer Codes , 2002 .

[17]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  A multidomain boundary element solution for silencer and muffler performance prediction , 1991 .

[18]  F. J. Rizzo,et al.  A weakly singular form of the hypersingular boundary integral equation applied to 3-D acoustic wave problems , 1992 .