Encoding of temporal signals by the TGF-β pathway and implications for embryonic patterning.

Genetics and biochemistry have defined the components and wiring of the signaling pathways that pattern the embryo. Among them, the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) pathway has the potential to behave as a morphogen: in vitro experiments established that it can dictate cell fate in a concentration-dependent manner. How morphogens convey positional information in a developing embryo, when signal levels change with time, is less understood. Using integrated microfluidic cell culture and time-lapse microscopy, we demonstrate here that the speed of ligand presentation has a key and previously unexpected influence on TGF-β signaling outcomes. The response to a TGF-β concentration step is transient and adaptive: slowly increasing the ligand concentration diminishes the response, and well-spaced pulses of ligand combine additively, resulting in greater pathway output than with constant stimulation. Our results suggest that in an embryonic context, the speed of change of ligand concentration is an instructive signal for patterning.

[1]  James Briscoe,et al.  Gene Regulatory Logic for Reading the Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Gradient in the Vertebrate Neural Tube , 2012, Cell.

[2]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Dynamics of TGF-β signaling reveal adaptive and pulsatile behaviors reflected in the nuclear localization of transcription factor Smad4 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Quake,et al.  Versatile, fully automated, microfluidic cell culture system. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Michel Kerszberg,et al.  Specifying Positional Information in the Embryo: Looking Beyond Morphogens , 2007, Cell.

[6]  A. Suzuki,et al.  Concentration-dependent patterning of the Xenopus ectoderm by BMP4 and its signal transducer Smad1. , 1997, Development.

[7]  A. Schohl,et al.  Beta-catenin, MAPK and Smad signaling during early Xenopus development. , 2002, Development.

[8]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Single cells can sense their position in a morphogen gradient. , 1999, Development.

[9]  S. Tapscott,et al.  The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription , 2005, Development.

[10]  A. Kicheva,et al.  Dynamics of Dpp Signaling and Proliferation Control , 2011, Science.

[11]  R. Derynck,et al.  TGF-beta inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3. , 2001, Genes & development.

[12]  M. Whitman,et al.  Timing of endogenous activin-like signals and regional specification of the Xenopus embryo. , 2001, Development.

[13]  Drew N. Robson,et al.  Supplementary Materials for Differential Diffusivity of Nodal and Lefty Underlies a Reaction-Diffusion Patterning System , 2012 .

[14]  J. Massagué,et al.  Smad transcription factors. , 2005, Genes & development.

[15]  J. Smith,et al.  Responses of embryonic xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm , 1992, Cell.

[16]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Inhibition of myogenesis by transforming growth factor beta is density-dependent and related to the translocation of transcription factor MEF2 to the cytoplasm. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Brock F. Binkowski,et al.  Engineered Luciferase Reporter from a Deep Sea Shrimp Utilizing a Novel Imidazopyrazinone Substrate , 2012, ACS chemical biology.

[18]  A. Schohl,et al.  β-catenin, MAPK and Smad signaling during early Xenopus development , 2007 .

[19]  Steven A. Harvey,et al.  Visualisation and Quantification of Morphogen Gradient Formation in the Zebrafish , 2009, PLoS biology.

[20]  Denis Vivien,et al.  Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGFβ‐inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor‐type 1 gene , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Y. Saka,et al.  A mechanism for the sharp transition of morphogen gradient interpretation in Xenopus , 2007, BMC Developmental Biology.

[22]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[23]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  Signaling gradients during paraxial mesoderm development. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[24]  A. Kicheva,et al.  Temporal dynamics of patterning by morphogen gradients. , 2009, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[25]  Douglas A. Chapnick,et al.  Dynamics of TGF‐β/Smad signaling , 2012, FEBS letters.