Welfare Benefits of Intradermal Vaccination of Piglets

Simple Summary Vaccination is reported as a stressful and painful event for animals. Very little is known about the welfare benefits of using needle-free intradermal vaccination in pigs. A commercial trial was conducted in Spain to assess whether intradermal vaccination could improve the welfare of growing pigs. The results demonstrated that the needle-free intradermal injection reduced the behavioural reaction at the time of vaccination. Contrary to intramuscular vaccination, intradermal vaccination did not affect general activity, social behaviour and exploratory behaviour of the piglets after the injection. Blood C-reactive protein and Haptoglobin levels were lower in the intradermal group suggesting a decreased acute phase response and reduced muscular damage compared to intramuscular injection. Thus, the needle-free intradermal method of vaccination of pigs represents a less invasive and less painful alternative to conventional intramuscular injections with needles. Abstract Vaccination is reported as a stressful and painful event for animals. This study investigated whether needle-free intradermal vaccination improves the welfare of weaned pigs through the reduction of stress and pain biomarkers and improvement of behavioural parameters compared to traditional intramuscular injection with a needle. A total of 339 weaned piglets were allocated to 3 treatment groups: Intradermal Application of Liquids (IDAL) pigs, vaccinated against Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2) by means of intradermal vaccination using a needle-free device Porcilis® PCV ID; Intramuscular (IM) pigs vaccinated against PCV2 with Porcilis® PCV intramuscularly with a needle; CONTROL pigs were managed identically but did not receive any vaccine injection. At the time of the injection, the reaction of IDAL piglets was similar to control piglets, whereas a greater percentage of piglets vaccinated intramuscularly displayed high-pitch vocalizations (7% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 32% IM) and retreat attempts (3% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 39% IM). The day after vaccination, IDAL piglets did not differ from the control piglets for any of the behavioural variables studied through scan samplings. IM piglets showed a lower frequency of social negative interactions (p = 0.001) and rope manipulation (p = 0.04) compared to the CONTROL group. Resting postures did not differ between treatments. At 28 h post-vaccination, IDAL piglets presented lower blood C-reactive protein levels (CONTROL = 20 μg/mL; IDAL = 39 μg/mL; IM = 83 μg/mL, p < 0.0001) and blood Haptoglobin (CONTROL = 1.8 mg/mL; IDAL = 1.9 mg/mL vs. IM = 3.1 mg/mL, p < 0.0001) compared to IM piglets. Salivary chromogranin A and alpha-amylase did not differ between treatment groups when measured 25 min post-vaccination. The method of vaccination did not affect the growth of the piglets or their rectal temperature. These results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination reduces vaccination-related pain in growing pigs.

[1]  T. Opriessnig,et al.  Porcine circoviruses: current status, knowledge gaps and challenges. , 2020, Virus research.

[2]  F. Gottardo,et al.  Evaluation of pain and stress in three-week old piglets in relation to route of vaccine administration , 2020 .

[3]  W. Gerner,et al.  Safety and immune responses after intradermal application of Porcilis PRRS in either the neck or the perianal region , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  J. Cerón,et al.  Changes in alpha-amylase activity, concentration and isoforms in pigs after an experimental acute stress model: an exploratory study , 2018, BMC Veterinary Research.

[5]  E. Ko,et al.  Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources , 2018 .

[6]  Xavier Manteca,et al.  On-farm and post-mortem health assessment , 2018 .

[7]  J. Cerón,et al.  Serum acute phase response induced by different vaccination protocols against circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in piglets. , 2017, Research in veterinary science.

[8]  Irina Vetter,et al.  Methods Used to Evaluate Pain Behaviors in Rodents , 2017, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[9]  Z. Afghah,et al.  Ten years of PCV2 vaccines and vaccination: Is eradication a possibility? , 2017, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  J. Cerón,et al.  Effect of the needle-free “intra dermal application of liquids” vaccination on the welfare of pregnant sows , 2017, Porcine health management.

[11]  J. McGlone,et al.  Comparison of Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Injections vs. Castration in Pigs—Impacts on Behavior and Welfare , 2016, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[12]  R. Marques,et al.  Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of beef cows. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[13]  J. Cerón,et al.  Changes in saliva biomarkers of stress and immunity in domestic pigs exposed to a psychosocial stressor. , 2015, Research in veterinary science.

[14]  C. Kuper,et al.  Evaluation of C-reactive protein as an inflammatory biomarker in rabbits for vaccine nonclinical safety studies. , 2013, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[15]  J. Cerón,et al.  Measurement of chromogranin A in porcine saliva: validation of a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay and evaluation of its application as a marker of acute stress. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[16]  P. Turner,et al.  Administration of substances to laboratory animals: routes of administration and factors to consider. , 2011, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[17]  G. Stingl,et al.  Immune functions of the skin. , 2011, Clinics in dermatology.

[18]  P. Eckersall,et al.  Optimal combinations of acute phase proteins for detecting infectious disease in pigs , 2011, Veterinary research.

[19]  J. Cerón,et al.  Validation of an Automated Method for Salivary Alpha-Amylase Measurements in Pigs (Sus Scrofa Domesticus) and its Application as a Stress Biomarker , 2011, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[20]  Marta Hernandez-Jover,et al.  Assessment of acute pain experienced by piglets from ear tagging, ear notching and intraperitoneal injectable transponders , 2010 .

[21]  S. Edwards,et al.  Reducing post-mixing aggression and skin lesions in weaned pigs by application of a synthetic maternal pheromone , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[22]  R. LaMotte,et al.  Behavioral differentiation between itch and pain in mouse , 2008, PAIN.

[23]  F. Milward,et al.  Needle-free injection technology in swine: Progress toward vaccine efficacy and pork quality , 2008 .

[24]  J. Cerón,et al.  Analytical validation of commercially available methods for acute phase proteins quantification in pigs. , 2007, Research in veterinary science.

[25]  A. L. Jensen,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of two immunoturbidimetric assays for the heterologous determination of porcine serum C-reactive protein. , 2007, Veterinary journal.

[26]  J. Sebranek,et al.  Effectiveness of transdermal, needle-free injections for reducing pork carcass defects. , 2004, Meat science.

[27]  M. Yoshioka,et al.  Current research on acute phase proteins in veterinary diagnosis: an overview. , 2004, Veterinary journal.

[28]  M. Roffman,et al.  Subcutaneous Injections With a Single-Use, Pre-Filled, Disposable Needle-Free Injection Device or Needle & Syringe: Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy & Acceptability , 2004 .

[29]  E. Borell,et al.  Analysis of pain-related vocalization in young pigs , 2003 .

[30]  M. Sarno,et al.  Clinical immunogenicity of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine delivered by the Injex jet injector: comparison with standard syringe injection. , 2000, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[31]  S. Hoff,et al.  Breakage and deformation characteristics of hypodermic devices under static and dynamic loading. , 1999, American journal of veterinary research.