A Noninvasive Gas Exchange Method to Test and Model Photosynthetic Proficiency and Growth Rates of In Vitro Plant Cultures: Preliminary Implication for Cannabis sativa L.

Simple Summary The gas exchange system presented herein integrates open-flow/force ventilation, LED technology, and micropropagation to determine the impact of environmental factors (e.g., [CO2], sucrose, light intensity) on the photosynthetic capacity of cultured plantlets. This system was developed and tested on Cannabis sativa L., an emerging crop of high economic value, for which micropropagation has become an important aspect of production. Since conventional micropropagation avenues can minimize photosynthetic performance, this system offers fresh opportunities to examine the role of light signaling and photosynthesis in micropropagation to investigate and overcome in-vitro-associated morphophysiological disorders. By maintaining [CO2] at controlled levels (400 and 1200 ppm) with calibrated light intensities, photosynthetic light response curves were prepared based on net carbon exchange rates (NCERs) to paint a picture of the dynamic, combinational influences of irradiance, [CO2], and additional factors on photosynthetic performance. Additionally, NCERs were continuously monitored during a 24 h light/dark period under standard conditions to provide estimates of relative growth rates (daily C-gain). Thus, a system is presented with the ability to answer questions about the nature of in vitro plant physiology related to carbon dynamics, that would otherwise be difficult to assess. Abstract Supplemental sugar additives for plant tissue culture cause mixotrophic growth, complicating carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthetic relationships. A unique platform to test and model the photosynthetic proficiency and biomass accumulation of micropropagated plantlets was introduced and applied to Cannabis sativa L. (cannabis), an emerging crop with high economic interest. Conventional in vitro systems can hinder the photoautotrophic ability of plantlets due to low light intensity, low vapor pressure deficit, and limited CO2 availability. Though exogenous sucrose is routinely added to improve in vitro growth despite reduced photosynthetic capacity, reliance on sugar as a carbon source can also trigger negative responses that are species-dependent. By increasing photosynthetic activity in vitro, these negative consequences can likely be mitigated, facilitating the production of superior specimens with enhanced survivability. The presented methods use an open-flow/force-ventilated gas exchange system and infrared gas analysis to measure the impact of [CO2], light, and additional factors on in vitro photosynthesis. This system can be used to answer previously overlooked questions regarding the nature of in vitro plant physiology to enhance plant tissue culture and the overall understanding of in vitro processes, facilitating new research methods and idealized protocols for commercial tissue culture.

[1]  A. Jones,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms for Precision Micropropagation of Cannabis sativa: Prediction and Validation of in vitro Shoot Growth and Development Based on the Optimization of Light and Carbohydrate Sources , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[2]  A. Jones,et al.  Advances and Perspectives in Tissue Culture and Genetic Engineering of Cannabis , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  M. Brand,et al.  An In Vitro–Ex Vitro Micropropagation System for Hemp , 2021, HortTechnology.

[4]  M. Elhiti,et al.  Medical Cannabis and Industrial Hemp Tissue Culture: Present Status and Future Potential , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[5]  A. M. P. Jones,et al.  DKW basal salts improve micropropagation and callogenesis compared with MS basal salts in multiple commercial cultivars of Cannabis sativa , 2021 .

[6]  Youbin Zheng,et al.  Cannabis Yield, Potency, and Leaf Photosynthesis Respond Differently to Increasing Light Levels in an Indoor Environment , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[7]  Youbin Zheng,et al.  Photoperiodic Response of In Vitro Cannabis sativa Plants , 2020, HortScience.

[8]  A. M. Jones,et al.  Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  J. Prohens,et al.  Development of a Direct in vitro Plant Regeneration Protocol From Cannabis sativa L. Seedling Explants: Developmental Morphology of Shoot Regeneration and Ploidy Level of Regenerated Plants , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[10]  Dan Jin,et al.  Cannabis Indoor Growing Conditions, Management Practices, and Post-Harvest Treatment: A Review , 2019, American Journal of Plant Sciences.

[11]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  Leaf and whole-plant gas exchange and water-use efficiency of chrysanthemums under HPS and LEDs during the vegetative and flower-induction stages , 2019, Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

[12]  Z. Lhotáková,et al.  Mixotrophic in vitro cultivations: the way to go astray in plant physiology. , 2019, Physiologia plantarum.

[13]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  Effect of elevated CO2 and spectral quality on whole plant gas exchange patterns in tomatoes , 2018, PloS one.

[14]  Dominika Rymarz,et al.  Application of wide-spectrum light-emitting diodes in micropropagation of popular ornamental plant species: a study on plant quality and cost reduction , 2018, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[15]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  Quantifying Growth Nondestructively Using Whole-Plant CO2 Exchange Is a Powerful Tool for Phenotyping , 2018, Handbook of Photosynthesis.

[16]  Bernard Grodzinski,et al.  Effects of Light Quality and Intensity on Diurnal Patterns and Rates of Photo-Assimilate Translocation and Transpiration in Tomato Leaves , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[17]  B. Pawłowska,et al.  LED lighting affects plant growth, morphogenesis and phytochemical contents of Myrtus communis L. in vitro , 2018, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC).

[18]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance regardless of photosynthetic induction state , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[19]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  P. Saxena,et al.  Application of 3D printing to prototype and develop novel plant tissue culture systems , 2017, Plant Methods.

[21]  L. Iglesias-Andreu,et al.  The Effect of Light Quality on Growth and Development of In Vitro Plantlet of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni , 2017, Sugar Tech.

[22]  Chengyao Jiang,et al.  Polychromatic Supplemental Lighting from underneath Canopy Is More Effective to Enhance Tomato Plant Development by Improving Leaf Photosynthesis and Stomatal Regulation , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[23]  N. Çağlayan,et al.  The Effects of Various LED Light Wavelengths to the Physiological and Morphological Parameters of Stevia ( Stevia rebaudiana ) Bertoni , 2016 .

[24]  C. K. Kim,et al.  Combined effects of supplementary light and CO2 on rose growth and the production of good quality cut flowers , 2016, Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

[25]  Mahmoud A. ElSohly,et al.  In vitro mass propagation of Cannabis sativa L.: A protocol refinement using novel aromatic cytokinin meta-topolin and the assessment of eco-physiological, biochemical and genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants , 2016 .

[26]  J. Ceusters,et al.  Influence of sucrose concentration on photosynthetic performance of Guzmania 'Hilda' in vitro , 2015 .

[27]  Byoung Ryong Jeong,et al.  Blue LED light enhances growth, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities of Rehmannia glutinosa cultured in vitro , 2015, Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology.

[28]  J. Casal,et al.  Phytochrome B Nuclear Bodies Respond to the Low Red to Far-Red Ratio and to the Reduced Irradiance of Canopy Shade in Arabidopsis1[C][W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[29]  M. Pessarakli Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology, Third Edition , 2014 .

[30]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  Quantifying Immediate Carbon Export from Leaves Predicts Source Strength , 2014 .

[31]  J. Flexas,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Light and Sucrose on In Vitro Propagated Plants: A Multiscale System Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence Technology , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  So-Young Park,et al.  Sugar metabolism, photosynthesis, and growth of in vitro plantlets of Doritaenopsis under controlled microenvironmental conditions , 2013, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[33]  D. Pradeepa,et al.  Studies on the effect of sucrose, light and hormones on micropropagation and in vitro flowering of Withania somnifera var. Jawahar-20. , 2013 .

[34]  Y. I. Lee,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF LED LIDS FOR TISSUE CULTURE LIGHTING , 2011 .

[35]  I. Khan,et al.  Photosynthetic response of Cannabis sativa L., an important medicinal plant, to elevated levels of CO2 , 2011, Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants.

[36]  R. Tewari,et al.  In vitro sucrose concentration affects growth and acclimatization of Alocasia amazonica plantlets , 2009, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC).

[37]  T. Kozai Photoautotrophic micropropagation , 2007, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[38]  S. Morini,et al.  Net CO2 exchange rate of in vitro plum cultures during growth evolution at different photosynthetic photon flux density , 2005 .

[39]  T. Kozai,et al.  Photoautotrophic growth response of in vitro cultured coffee plantlets to ventilation methods and photosynthetic photon fluxes under carbon dioxide enriched condition , 2001, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[40]  F. Tadeo,et al.  Impact of culture vessel ventilation on the anatomy and morphology of micropropagated carnation , 2000, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[41]  Uyen Thi Van Nguyen,et al.  Photosynthetic characteristics of coffee (Coffea arabusta) plantlets in vitro in response to different CO2 concentrations and light intensities , 1998, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[42]  P. Debergh,et al.  Effect of different environmental conditions in vitro on sucrose metabolism and antioxidant enzymatic activities in cultured shoots of Nicotiana tabacum L. , 1998, Plant Growth Regulation.

[43]  S. Dey,et al.  Photoautotrophic in vitro Multiplication of the Orchid Dendrobium under CO2 Enrichment , 2004, Biologia plantarum.

[44]  A. Miszczak,et al.  Effect of CO2 enrichment, light and sucrose on quality of rose and gerbera microcuttings in vitro and their subsequent ex vitro rooting , 2003 .

[45]  R. S. Tamés,et al.  Influence of CO2 and sucrose on photosynthesis and transpiration of Actinidia deliciosa explants cultured in vitro. , 2002, Physiologia plantarum.

[46]  A. Premkumar,et al.  Effects of in vitro tissue culture conditions and acclimatization on the contents of Rubisco, leaf soluble proteins, photosynthetic pigments, and C/N ratio , 2001 .

[47]  T. Kozai,et al.  A System for Measuring the In Situ CO2 Exchange Rates of In Vitro Plantlets , 1998 .

[48]  V. Čapková,et al.  Culture on sugar medium enhances photosynthetic capacity and high light resistance of plantlets grown in vitro , 1998 .

[49]  C. Mitchell Measurement of photosynthetic gas exchange in controlled environments. , 1992, HortScience : a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[50]  J. Janick,et al.  Increased CO2 and Light Promote in Vitro Shoot Growth and Development of Theobroma cacao , 1991 .

[51]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  Whole Plant CO(2) Exchange Measurements for Nondestructive Estimation of Growth. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[52]  T. Kozai,et al.  Fundamental Studies on Environments in Plant Tissue Culture Vessels , 1986 .