Latent Variables in a Travel Mode Choice Model: Attitudinal and Behavioural Indicator Variables

In a travel mode choice context, we use survey data to construct and test the significance of five individual specific latent variables – environmental preferences, safety, comfort, convenience and flexibility - postulated to be important for modal choice. Whereas the construction of the safety and environmental preference variables is based on behavioural indicator variables, the construction of the comfort, convenience and flexibility variables is based on attitudinal indicator variables. Our main findings are that the latent variables enriched discrete choice model outperforms the traditional discrete choice model and that the construct reliability of the “attitudinal” latent variables is higher than that of the “behavioural” latent variables. Important for the choice of travel mode are modal travel time and cost and the individual’s preferences for flexibility and comfort as well as her environmental preferences.

[1]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[2]  Linwood Pendleton,et al.  Valuing Bundled Attributes: A Latent Characteristics Approach , 2001, Land Economics.

[3]  E. Savvidou.  The relationship between skilled labor and technical change , 2003 .

[4]  D. McFadden.  The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[5]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models , 1985 .

[6]  J. Graham,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability? , 1999 .

[7]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[8]  Per Pettersson-Lidbom,et al.  An Empirical Approach for Evaluating Soft Budget Constraints , 2003 .

[9]  M Lenner.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS REGARDING DIFFERENT MEANS AND MODES OF TRANSPORTATION , 1993 .

[10]  D A Hensher,et al.  THE TIMING OF CHANGE FOR AUTOMOBILE TRANSACTIONS: COMPETING RISK MULTISPELL SPECIFICATION (CHAPTER 27 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[11]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[13]  Matz Dahlberg,et al.  Is There a "Race-to-the-Bottom" in the Setting of Welfare Benefit Levels? : Evidence from a Policy Intervention , 2008 .

[14]  Kenneth Train,et al.  THE GOODS/LEISURE TRADEOFF AND DISAGGREGATE WORK TRIP MODE CHOICE MODELS. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1978 .

[15]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[16]  Matz Dahlberg,et al.  Antidepressants and the suicide rate: is there really a connection? , 2005, Advances in health economics and health services research.

[17]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Maria Vredin Johansson.  Allocation and Ex Ante Cost Efficiency of a Swedish Subsidy for Environmental Sustainability: The Local Investment Program , 2004 .

[19]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[20]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Factors Influencing Household Recycling Behavior , 1991 .

[21]  M. Browne.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[22]  S. Blomquist,et al.  Redistribution and Provision of Public Goods in an Economic Federation , 2004 .

[23]  Sergio Jara-Diaz,et al.  TIME AND INCOME IN TRAVEL CHOICE: TOWARDS A MICROECONOMIC ACTIVITY- BASED THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. , 1998 .

[24]  Magnus Gustavsson.  Changes in Educational Wage Premiums in Sweden: 1992-2001 , 2004 .

[25]  Magnus Gustavsson,et al.  Trends in the Transitory Variance of Earnings: Evidence from Sweden 1960-1990 and a Comparison with the United States , 2004 .

[26]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Valuation of environmental impacts of transportation projects: the challenge of self-interest proximity , 1999 .

[27]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data , 2002 .

[28]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  Two Stage and Related Estimators and Their Applications , 1986 .

[29]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Detection of income effect in mode choice: theory and application , 1989 .

[30]  D. Wise,et al.  A CONDITIONAL PROBIT MODEL FOR QUALITATIVE CHOICE: DISCRETE DECISIONS RECOGNIZING INTERDEPENDENCE AND HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES' , 1978 .

[31]  Mikael Carlsson.  Investment and Uncertainty: A Theory-Based Empirical Approach , 2007 .

[32]  J. Andreoni.  Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Iida Häkkinen,et al.  Working while enrolled in a university: Does it pay? , 2006 .

[34]  Henrik Jordahl,et al.  Does free trade really reduce growth? Further testing using the economic freedom index , 2005 .

[35]  T Morikawa,et al.  DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS WITH LATENT VARIABLES USING SUBJECTIVE DATA (CHAPTER 24 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[36]  Kalidas Ashok,et al.  Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .

[37]  A. Deserpa.  A Theory of the Economics of Time , 1971 .

[38]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[39]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[40]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[41]  D. Pearce,et al.  Cost?Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[42]  Sören Blomquist,et al.  Redistribution, In-Kind Transfers and Matching Grants when the Federal Government Lacks Information on Local Costs , 2004 .