Highly Well Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Benign Hepatocellular Lesions

OBJECTIVE To determine whether highly well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma can be distinguished from benign hepatocellular lesions on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). STUDY DESIGN Ninety-five FNABs from 88 patients with hepatic masses/diffuse conditions were reviewed according to new cytologic criteria established by Takenaka et al. They were classified into well-, moderately and poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (W-, M- and P-HCC) and benign aspirates and histologically verified. RESULTS There were 21 W-HCC, 39 M-HCC, 10 P-HCC, 3 problematic and 22 benign aspirates. The most useful criteria for diagnosing highly W-HCC were architectural features on the smears/cell block sections, including hypercellularity; arborescent, cohesive clusters; broad trabeculae; transgressing and peripheral endothelium; and cytologic details of small, monotonous hepatocytes with nuclear crowding, decreased cytoplasm, increased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, atypical naked nuclei and tumor giant cells. Well-defined cytoplasmic borders, abundant thick and monotonous cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, thick nuclear membranes, irregular nuclear contours, increased chromatin density, irregular chromatin distribution and macronucleoli were not always detectable in highly W-HCC. In fact, some of them were seen in dysplastic hepatocytes. Deficient reticulin patterns and diffuse sinusoidal CD34 reactivity were helpful. CONCLUSION Experience, attention to architectural and cytologic details in smears/cell blocks and clinicopathologic correlation should reduce the number of indeterminate reports. However, there will always remain some cytohistologically challenging cases.

[1]  B. Sepúlveda,et al.  [Primary carcinoma of the liver]. , 1952, Gaceta medica de Mexico.

[2]  R. Lim,et al.  A step‐wise logistic regression analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma an aspiration biopsy study , 1988, Cancer.

[3]  F. Voyvodic,et al.  Biopsy Diagnosis of Malignant Versus Benign Liver “Nodules”: New Helpful Markers. An Update. , 2000, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[4]  S. Sharifi,et al.  Immunocytochemical Staining of Kupffer and Endothelial Cells in Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[5]  L. Ferrell,et al.  Utility of CD34 Reactivity in Evaluating Focal Nodular Hepatocellular Lesions Sampled by Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[6]  E. Longchampt,et al.  Accuracy of Cytology vs. Microbiopsy for theDiagnosis of Well-DifferentiatedHepatocellular Carcinoma andMacroregenerative NoduleDefinition of Standardized Criteria from a Study of 100Cases , 2001 .

[7]  S. Ishiguro,et al.  Usefulness of Diagnostic Criteria for Aspiration Cytology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 1999, Acta Cytologica.

[8]  A. Wee,et al.  pCEA canalicular immunostaining in fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[9]  M. Bisceglia,et al.  Cytological vs microhistological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma , 1996, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[10]  A. Wee,et al.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Some unusual features. , 1991, Acta cytologica.

[11]  G. Sterrett,et al.  Can CD34 discriminate between benign and malignant hepatocytic lesions in fine‐needle aspirates and thin core biopsies? , 2000, Cancer.

[12]  L. Zoebeli,et al.  Fine needle aspiration of the liver. Significance of hepatocytic naked nuclei in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1988, Acta cytologica.

[13]  T. Kawaguchi,et al.  Budd-Chiari syndrome complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of infection with hepatitis virus: a case report. , 1999, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[14]  M. Cohen,et al.  Cytologic criteria to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from nonneoplastic liver. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[15]  L. Tao Are oral contraceptive-associated liver cell adenomas premalignant? , 1992, Acta cytologica.

[16]  R. Lloyd,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Needle biopsy findings in 74 cases , 1997, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[17]  G. Sterrett,et al.  Cytodiagnosis of well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[18]  J. Bruix,et al.  Value and limitations of cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by fine needle aspiration biopsy. , 1993, Acta cytologica.

[19]  E. Longchampt,et al.  Accuracy of Cytology vs. Microbiopsy for the Diagnosis of Well-Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Macroregenerative Nodule , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[20]  C BERMAN,et al.  Primary carcinoma of the liver. , 1958, Advances in cancer research.

[21]  A. Wee,et al.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagnostic dilemma at the ends of the spectrum. , 1994, Acta cytologica.

[22]  M. Pitman,et al.  Significance of endothelium in the fine‐needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma , 1995, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[23]  D. Das Cytodiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in fine‐needle aspirates of the liver: Its differentiation from reactive hepatocytes and metastatic adenocarcinoma , 1999, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[24]  K. Tanikawa,et al.  Sinusoidal capillarization in small hepatocellular carcinoma , 1994, Pathology international.

[25]  M. Pitman,et al.  The usefulness of the reticulin stain in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules on fine-needle aspiration biopsy cell block preparations. , 1997, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[26]  Prabodh K. Gupta,et al.  Differential diagnostic dilemmas in malignant fine‐needle aspirates of liver: A practical approach to final diagnosis , 1995, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[27]  I. Ruschenburg,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. , 1989, Acta cytologica.