Sparsity-promoting adaptive sensor selection for non-linear filtering

Sensor selection is an important design task in sensor networks. We consider the problem of adaptive sensor selection for applications in which the observations follow a non-linear model, e.g., target/bearing tracking. In adaptive sensor selection, based on the dynamical state model and the state estimate from the previous time step, the most informative sensors are selected to acquire the measurements for the next time step. This is done via the design of a sparse selection vector. Additionally, we model the evolution of the selection vector over time to ensure a smooth transition between the selected sensors of subsequent time steps. The original non-convex optimization problem is relaxed to a semi-definite programming problem that can be solved efficiently in polynomial time.

[1]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[3]  Qing Ling,et al.  Distributed Sensor Allocation for Multi-Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Feng Jiang,et al.  Linearly reconfigurable Kalman filtering for a vector process , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multisensor resource deployment using posterior Cramer-Rao bounds , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Pengcheng Zhan,et al.  Adaptive Mobile Sensor Positioning for Multi-Static Target Tracking , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Posterior Crlb Based Sensor Selection for Target Tracking in Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  From Sparse Signals to Sparse Residuals for Robust Sensing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Sundeep Prabhakar Chepuri,et al.  Sparsity-Promoting Sensor Selection for Non-Linear Measurement Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Tracking target signal strengths on a grid using sparsity , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[14]  Avishy Carmi,et al.  Sensor scheduling via compressed sensing , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[15]  Sundeep Prabhakar Chepuri,et al.  Sparsity-exploiting anchor placement for localization in sensor networks , 2013, 21st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2013).

[16]  Vassilis Kekatos,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units via Convex Relaxation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Sparsity-Promoting Extended Kalman Filtering for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Sparsity-aware Kalman tracking of target signal strengths on a grid , 2011, 14th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[19]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Near-Optimal Sensor Placement for Inverse Problems , 2013, ArXiv.