Self-efficacy, risk taking and performance in rock climbing

Abstract Self-efficacy may be associated with high risk behaviors in climbers operating at outdoor venues, though little is known about climbers recruited at indoor venues or less risky forms of rock climbing. Two-hundred and one active rock climbers (163 male) aged 16–62 years were recruited at five outdoor and six indoor climbing venues in Britain in a retrospective study. The relationship of self-efficacy to the frequency and difficulty of high and medium risk rock climbing behaviors was modelled using linear regression. Climbers high in self-efficacy engaged in both high and medium risk forms of rock climbing more frequently ( β  ⩾ 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04–0.32) and at a higher level of difficulty ( β  ⩾ 0.20, 95% CI 0.04–0.36). These associations were attenuated slightly with adjustment for covariates, though all remained significant. The same pattern of associations was observed for climbers recruited at indoor and outdoor venues, and for male and female climbers. Rock climbers may therefore participate more frequently, take calculated additional risks and attempt harder climbs when they feel confident in their abilities and are high in self-efficacy. Researchers should not assume psychological or behavioral homogeneity within risk taking populations.

[1]  Bradley D. Hatfield,et al.  Generalization of Self-Efficacy to a Continuum of Stressors Upon Mastery of a High-Risk Sport Skill , 1988 .

[2]  A J Logan,et al.  Acute hand and wrist injuries in experienced rock climbers , 2004, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  D. Vlahov,et al.  Self-efficacy estimates for drug use practices predict risk reduction among injection drug users , 2002, Journal of Urban Health.

[5]  R. McClure,et al.  Injury and risk-taking behavior-a systematic review. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  C. Mann,et al.  Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[7]  D. Robinson Stress Seeking: Selected Behavioral Characteristics of Elite Rock Climbers , 1985 .

[8]  Xavier Sanchez,et al.  Individual differences and risk taking in rock climbing , 2008 .

[9]  M. Pain,et al.  Essay: Risk taking in sport , 2005, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Bassi,et al.  Quality of Experience and Risk Perception in High-Altitude Rock Climbing , 2003 .

[11]  M. Zuckerman Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking , 1994 .

[12]  Allen Fyffe,et al.  Handbook of Climbing , 1991 .

[13]  Hao Zhao,et al.  The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  D. Llewellyn,et al.  The epidemiology of rock-climbing injuries , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  A. Ewert Playing the Edge , 1994 .

[16]  A. Kontos Perceived risk, risk taking, estimation of ability and injury among adolescent sport participants. , 2004, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[17]  John Weinman,et al.  Psychological change following a long sail training voyage , 1996 .

[18]  D M Wright,et al.  Indoor rock climbing: who gets injured? , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[19]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[20]  Kjell Erik Rudestam,et al.  Motivation and Disinhibition in High Risk Sports: Sensation Seeking and Self-Efficacy , 1997 .

[21]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .