Use of Design Methods, Team Leaders' Goal Orientation, and Team Effectiveness: A Follow-Up Study in Software Development Projects

This article reports an empirical study on effectiveness of software development teams. Itwaspredicted thatboththe extent to whieh designmethods are used and teamleaders' goal orientation is related to team effectiveness. Follow-up data (6-12 months after first assessment) were available from 25 German and Swiss software developmentprojeets. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that use of design methods and team leaders' goal orientation predicted team effideney and changeability of the software product. In addition, goal orientation predicted maintaining schedule and budget. Practical impli­ cations of this study refer to the necessity to consider both the use of design methods and leadership issues when aiming at effective software development projects.

[1]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[2]  Deborah A. Boehm-Davis,et al.  Program Design Methodologies and the Software Development Process , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[4]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  System development methodology and project success: An assessment of situational approaches , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Software tasks: Intellectual or clerical? , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[7]  Michael Frese,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Goal Orientation and Planfulness: Action Styles as Personality Concepts , 1987 .

[8]  Michael Frese,et al.  Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projectsthere are many! , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Glenford J. Myers,et al.  Structured Design , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[10]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Goal orientation of team leaders: Its effects on performance and group interaction in software development projects , 1994 .

[11]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[13]  Anthony I. Wasserman.  Information system design methodology , 1980, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Building high performing engineering project teams , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  Jon P. Howell,et al.  Substitutes for Leadership: An Empirical Study. , 1980 .

[16]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Leadership and group performance: a positive relationship in academic research units , 1979 .

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals , 1993 .

[18]  Felix C. Brodbeck.  Kommunikation und Leistung in Projektarbeitsgruppen: eine empirische Untersuchung an Software-Entwicklungsprojekten , 1993 .

[19]  Jochen Prümper,et al.  Handlungsstile und Leistungsverhalten: Die Rolle von Plan- und Zielorientierung in Problem- und Lernsituationen , 1995 .

[20]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[21]  N. Endler,et al.  Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S-R inventory of anxiousness. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[23]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Systematic Sources of Suboptimal Interface Design in Large Product Development Organizations , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  S. C. Hill,et al.  A natural experiment on the influence of leadership behavior patterns on scientific productivity , 1970 .

[25]  Edward Yourdon,et al.  Object-oriented design , 1991, Yourdon Press Computing Series.

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Substitutes for Leadership Really Substitute for Leadership? An Empirical Examination of Kerr and Jermier's Situational Leadership Model , 1993 .

[27]  Nancy Pennington,et al.  The effects of paradigm on cognitive activities in design , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .