Energy performance of dwelling stock in Iceland: System dynamics approach

Abstract Despite the significant energy use in dwellings, buildings have the highest energy savings potential among all sectors. One of the main analytical challenges is how to capture the impact from inertia driven by the current dwelling stock. Thus, a dwelling stock model was established to study the impacts of physical processes (e.g., aging), as well as the effect of social processes (e.g., household energy conservation behaviors) on energy demand for space heating in the Icelandic dwelling stock. The model is initialized in the year 2000, and then calibrated with datasets on the Icelandic dwelling stock and hot water consumption for residential space heating. Analysis of the base scenario confirms that the improvement in the average energy intensity of total dwelling stock with regular turnover of the dwelling stock is insignificant and gradual, which relates to the inertia of the existing stock. The comparison of the results from two policy scenarios with the base case, illustrates that the aggressive demolition is more effective compared to the aggressive construction in reducing the total energy demand for space heating. The results of this analysis can support policy makers by providing insights regarding the potential impact of building energy-efficiency policies ensuring an effective policy package.

[1]  Y. Geng,et al.  Analysis of existing building energy saving policies in Japan and China , 2016 .

[2]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  Extent of inertia caused by the existing building stock against an energy transition in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[3]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Costs of retrofit measures in Swedish residential building stock – an evaluation for three scenarios on future energy prices , 2011 .

[4]  Bruno Peuportier,et al.  Eco-design of buildings using thermal simulation and life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[5]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[6]  Bin Huang,et al.  Energy and carbon performance evaluation for buildings and urban precincts: review and a new modelling concept , 2017 .

[7]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[8]  J.-P.A. Snäkin An engineering model for heating energy and emission assessment The case of North Karelia, Finland , 2000 .

[9]  M. Binswanger Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[10]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  An agent based environmental impact assessment of building demolition waste management: Conventional versus green management , 2016 .

[11]  Zhihua Zhou,et al.  Achieving energy efficient buildings via retrofitting of existing buildings: a case study , 2016 .

[12]  Henk Visscher,et al.  The effect of occupancy and building characteristics on energy use for space and water heating in Dutch residential stock , 2009 .

[13]  Jay Wright Forrester,et al.  Urban Dynamics , 1969 .

[14]  N. V. Beeck Classification of Energy Models , 1999 .

[15]  Carlos Capelo Modeling the Diffusion of Energy Performance Contracting , 2011 .

[16]  Wenbo Dong,et al.  Analysing co-benefits of the energy conservation and carbon reduction in China's large commercial buildings , 2013 .

[17]  Stefan Grönkvist,et al.  Drivers for and barriers to low-energy buildings in Sweden , 2015 .

[18]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[19]  Sevastianos Mirasgedis,et al.  CO2 emission reduction policies in the greek residential sector: a methodological framework for their economic evaluation , 2004 .

[20]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Modeling and visualization of residential sector energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions , 2014 .

[21]  Júlia Seixas,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up modelling to support low-carbon scenarios: climate policy implications , 2013 .

[22]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Sustainable development modelling for the energy sector , 2014 .

[23]  Liyin Shen,et al.  Research on the development of main policy instruments for improving building energy-efficiency , 2016 .

[24]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey , 2002 .

[25]  V. Dovi',et al.  Cleaner energy for sustainable future , 2009 .

[26]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[27]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[28]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Perspectives on global change : the TARGETS approach , 1997 .

[29]  Immanuel Stieß,et al.  Objectives, barriers and occasions for energy efficient refurbishment by private homeowners , 2013 .

[30]  Eric Hirst A model of residential energy use , 1978 .

[31]  P. Balachandra,et al.  Dynamics of technology shifts in the household sector—implications for clean development mechanism , 2006 .

[32]  Olatz Pombo,et al.  The challenge of sustainable building renovation: assessment of current criteria and future outlook , 2015 .

[33]  Carrie A. Webber,et al.  Addressing energy-related challenges for the US buildings sector: results from the clean energy futures study , 2001 .

[34]  Nuria Forcada,et al.  Energy mapping of existing building stock in Spain , 2016 .

[35]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modelling household responses to energy efficiency interventions via system dynamics and survey data , 2010 .

[36]  Felix Suerkemper,et al.  Energy efficiency services for residential buildings: market situation and existing potentials in the European Union , 2015 .

[37]  Laure Itard,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction , 2007 .

[38]  David N. Ford,et al.  Sustainable campus improvement program design using energy efficiency and conservation , 2015 .

[39]  Frédéric Magoulès,et al.  A review on the prediction of building energy consumption , 2012 .

[40]  Shuzo Murakami,et al.  Energy Consumption, Efficiency, Conservation, and Greenhouse GasMitigation in Japan's Building Sector , 2006 .

[41]  Bin Shui,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of building energy efficiency policies in China: status quo and development perspective , 2015 .

[42]  S. Svendsen,et al.  Residential and commercial buildings , 2012 .

[43]  Stefan N. Grösser,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of the Residential Building Environment: What Mechanisms Determine the Development of the Building Stock? , 2007 .

[44]  V. Ismet Ugursal,et al.  Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques , 2009 .

[45]  C. Hendriks,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change , 2003 .

[46]  V. I. Ugursal,et al.  A residential end‐use energy consumption model for Canada , 1998 .

[47]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Using a dynamic segmented model to examine future renovation activities in the Norwegian dwelling stock , 2014 .

[48]  Tarik Kousksou,et al.  Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: current status and future trends , 2015 .

[49]  E. Geyer-Allély,et al.  Household consumption patterns in OECD countries: trends and figures , 2003 .

[50]  K. Wittchen,et al.  Energy savings in the Danish building stock until 2050 , 2014 .