Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning

The sociotechnical context for learning and education is dynamic and makes great demands on those trying to seize the opportunities presented by emerging technologies. The goal of this paper is to explore certain theories for our plans and actions in technology-enabled learning. Although presented as a successor to previous learning theories, connectivism alone is insufficient to inform learning and its support by technology in an internetworked world. However, because of its presence in massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism is influential in the practice of those who take these courses and who wish to apply it in teaching and learning. Thus connectivism is perceived as relevant by its practitioners but as lacking in rigour by its critics. Five scenarios of change are presented with frameworks of different theories to explore the variety of approaches educators can take in the contexts for change and their associated research/evaluation. I argue that the choice of which theories to use depends on the scope and purposes of the intervention, the funding available to resource the research/evaluation, and the experience and philosophical stances of the researchers/practitioners.

[1]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[2]  A V Lukashin,et al.  [Physical models of neural networks]. , 1987, Biofizika.

[3]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[4]  TamGas Geszti,et al.  Physical Models of Neural Networks , 1990 .

[5]  Amin Rajan,et al.  In the age of the smart machine , 1990 .

[6]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household , 2003 .

[7]  I. McManus Knowing the knowledge. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[8]  W. Ball Using the Internet as a Teaching Tool: Why Wait Any Longer? , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[9]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[10]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  P. Duchastel,et al.  Prolegomena to a Theory of Instructional Design , 1998 .

[12]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[13]  Peter S. Cookson Editorial - The Hybridzation of Higher Education: Cross national perspectives , 2002 .

[14]  R. Mansell Introduction: Inside the communication revolution: evolving patterns of social and technical interaction , 2002 .

[15]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Virtual Communities and the New Economy , 2002 .

[16]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household , 2003 .

[17]  S. Chaiklin The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. , 2003 .

[18]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATIONAL THEORY FOR ONL INE LEARNING , 2004 .

[19]  Leonie Rowan,et al.  Flexible learning in teacher education: myths, muddles and models , 2004 .

[20]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[21]  H. Rohracher User Involvement in Innovation Processes : Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective , 2005 .

[22]  Robin Williams,et al.  The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User , 2005 .

[23]  George Siemens Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? , 2006 .

[24]  George Siemens,et al.  Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? , 2006 .

[25]  Y. Engeström,et al.  From workplace learning to inter‐organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory , 2007 .

[26]  Jen Ross,et al.  The 'digital native' and 'digital immigrant': a dangerous opposition , 2007 .

[27]  Dennis Beck,et al.  The other side of the LMS: Considering implementation and use in the adoption of an LMS in online and blended learning environments , 2007 .

[28]  S. Downes Places to Go: Facebook , 2007 .

[29]  Dave Cormier,et al.  Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum , 2008 .

[30]  Rita Kop,et al.  Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? , 2008 .

[31]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[32]  A. Littlejohn,et al.  Thriving in the 21st century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project) , 2009 .

[33]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  The digital native - myth and reality , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[34]  Roy Williams,et al.  The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC , 2010 .

[35]  Roy Williams,et al.  Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC , 2010 .

[36]  Frances Bell,et al.  Network theories for technology-enabled learning and social change: Connectivism and actor network theory , 2010 .

[37]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.