Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide

Such diverse thinkers as Lao-Tze, Confucius, and U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have all pointed out that we need to be able to tell the difference between real and assumed knowledge. The systematic review is a scientific tool that can help with this difficult task. It can help, for example, with appraising, summarising, and communicating the results and implications of otherwise unmanageable quantities of data. This is important because quite often there are so many studies, and their results are often so conflicting, that no policymaker or practitioner could possibly carry out this task themselves.Systematic review methods have been widely used in health care, and are becoming increasingly common in the social sciences (fostered, for example, by the work of the Campbell Collaboration). This book outlines the rationale and methods of systematic reviews, giving worked examples from social science and other fields. It requires no previous knowledge, but takes the reader through the process stage by stage. It draws on examples from such diverse fields as psychology, criminology, education, transport, social welfare, public health, and housing and urban policy, among others.The book includes detailed sections on assessing the quality of both quantitative, and qualitative research; searching for evidence in the social sciences;meta-analytic and other methods of evidence synthesis; publication bias; heterogeneity; and approaches to dissemination.

[1]  A Plea for Summaries and Indexes , 1903 .

[2]  A. Winsor The relative variability of boys and girls. , 1927 .

[3]  An experimental study of apparent movement , 1931 .

[4]  A Texan in England , 1945 .

[5]  D. Harris The Socialization of the Delinquent , 1948 .

[6]  J DEESE,et al.  The effects of psychological stress upon performance. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  R. Doll,et al.  Study of the Aetiology of Carcinoma of the Lung , 1952, British medical journal.

[8]  J. Singer,et al.  Psychological consequences of brain lesions and ablations. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  W. Beveridge The Art Of Scientific Investigation , 1957 .

[10]  T. Sterling Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa , 1959 .

[11]  P. Fraisse The psychology of time , 1963 .

[12]  R. Pawlicki Behaviour-therapy research with children: A critical review. , 1970 .

[13]  R. Light,et al.  Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies. , 1971 .

[14]  J. Ravetz Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[15]  H. Meltzer REVIEW OF REVIEWS IN INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1950–1969 , 1972 .

[16]  William P. Kuvlesky Disability and Family Stress: Conceptual Specification and Research Possibilities. , 1973 .

[17]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[18]  M. L. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. , 1977, The American psychologist.

[19]  B. Efron,et al.  Stein's Paradox in Statistics , 1977 .

[20]  H. Eysenck An exercise in mega-silliness. , 1978 .

[21]  Mary Lee Smith,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship of Class-Size and Achievement. The Class Size and Instruction Project. , 1978 .

[22]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[23]  D. Sackett Bias in analytic research. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[24]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[25]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  S. Rachman,et al.  The effects of psychological therapy , 1980 .

[27]  W. Silverman Retrolental Fibroplasia: A Modern Parable , 1980 .

[28]  L. Delbeke Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[29]  T C Chalmers,et al.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.

[30]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[31]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[32]  T. Cook,et al.  A Meta‐Analytic Analysis of Effects of Psychoeducational Interventions on Length of Postsurgical Hospital Stay , 1983, Nursing research.

[33]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[34]  W. Shadish Policy research: Lessons from the implementation of deinstitutionalization. , 1984 .

[35]  R. Jowell,et al.  British Social Attitudes the 1984 report , 1984 .

[36]  Harris Cooper,et al.  The Integrative Research Review: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[37]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[38]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews , 1986 .

[39]  F. Hansford-Miller 13. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision , 1988 .

[40]  G. Noblit,et al.  Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies , 1988 .

[41]  J. Tyson,et al.  Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies. , 1989, Pediatrics.

[42]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1989 .

[43]  I. Chalmers,et al.  Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublished controlled trials: lessons from a survey of obstetricians and pediatricians. , 1989, Pediatrics.

[44]  W. Shadish,et al.  Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice , 1990 .

[45]  I Chalmers,et al.  Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. , 1990, JAMA.

[46]  R. J. Hartley,et al.  Online searching : principles and practice , 1990 .

[47]  Maeve Binchy Circle of Friends , 1990 .

[48]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Reply to comments , 1990 .

[49]  M. Wadsworth The imprint of time : childhood, history, and adult life , 1991 .

[50]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[51]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[52]  E. Chelimsky,et al.  On the Social Science Contribution to Governmental Decision-Making , 1991, Science.

[53]  T C Chalmers,et al.  Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. , 1992, BMJ.

[54]  Angela Everitt,et al.  Applied Research for Better Practice , 1992 .

[55]  T C Chalmers,et al.  Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  A. Grant,et al.  Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care. , 1993, The Milbank quarterly.

[57]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The Science of Reviewing Research a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[59]  H. Roberts,et al.  Prevention is better , 1993 .

[60]  J. Lau,et al.  Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.

[61]  Ching-Chi Hsieh,et al.  Poverty, Income Inequality, and Violent Crime: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Aggregate Data Studies , 1993 .

[62]  R. Rosenthal Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[63]  A D Oxman,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles , 1994, BMJ.

[64]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. , 1994 .

[65]  Paul M. Wortman,et al.  Judging research quality. , 1994 .

[66]  Joel B. Greenhouse,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics. , 1994 .

[67]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[68]  H J Eysenck,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Meta-analysis and its problems , 1994, BMJ.

[69]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[70]  S G Thompson,et al.  Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated , 1994, BMJ.

[71]  V. Pollock,et al.  Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. , 1994 .

[72]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Qualitative methods for assessing health care. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[73]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[74]  John B. Willett,et al.  The visual presentation and interpretation of meta-analyses. , 1994 .

[75]  George Davey Smith,et al.  Misleading meta-analysis , 1995, BMJ.

[76]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[77]  N Freemantle,et al.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. , 1995, Quality in health care : QHC.

[78]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[80]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[81]  E. Gaffan,et al.  Researcher allegiance and meta-analysis: the case of cognitive therapy for depression. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[82]  What works in the early years , 1995 .

[83]  R. Slavin Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[84]  D. Cowley,et al.  Prostheses for Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature , 1995, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[85]  W. Shadish,et al.  Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals , 1995 .

[86]  Amos Tversky The Psychology of Decision Making , 1995 .

[87]  J Kerr,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC RESTRAINT POLICIES: A SIMPLE META-REGRESSION ANALYSIS , 1996 .

[88]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. , 1996 .

[89]  John Ziman,et al.  Is science losing its objectivity? , 1996, Nature.

[90]  A. Ponsonby,et al.  Sudden infant death syndrome: after the “back to sleep” campaign , 1996, BMJ.

[91]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis , 1996, BMJ.

[92]  Cindy Farquhar,et al.  3 The Cochrane Library , 1996 .

[93]  V Torri,et al.  Beware of Surrogate Outcome Measures , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[94]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[95]  J. Barraclough Adverse life events and breast cancer , 1996, BMJ.

[96]  N. Black Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care , 1996, BMJ.

[97]  Mary E. Boyce Organizational story and storytelling: a critical review , 1996 .

[98]  F B Hu,et al.  Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[99]  M. Allen,et al.  Comparing the impact of homosexual and heterosexual parents on children: meta-analysis of existing research. , 1997, Journal of homosexuality.

[100]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study , 1997, BMJ.

[101]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[102]  David B. Wilson,et al.  School Based Crime Prevention , 1997 .

[103]  Richard Smith,et al.  An amnesty for unpublished trials , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[104]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) , 1997 .

[105]  A. Jadad,et al.  How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[106]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests , 1997, BMJ.

[107]  D. Sharpe,et al.  Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. , 1997, Clinical psychology review.

[108]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[109]  Doctors' information: excessive, crummy, and bent , 1997 .

[110]  Grahame Pope MPhil Mcsp The Pocket Guide to Critical Appraisal , 1997 .

[111]  P. Magnus,et al.  Treatment of herpes simplex gingivostomatitis with aciclovir in children: a randomised double blind placebo controlled study , 1997, BMJ.

[112]  C. Hertzman,et al.  Social and biological pathways linking early life and adult disease. , 1997, British medical bulletin.

[113]  Anna Donald,et al.  Getting Research Findings into Practice , 1998 .

[114]  David R. Jones,et al.  Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[115]  G. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies , 1998, BMJ.

[116]  A. Vickers,et al.  Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[117]  Susan R. Wilson,et al.  Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews , 1998, BMJ.

[118]  Robert Dingwall,et al.  Catching Goldfish: Quality in Qualitative Research , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[119]  J. Bonta,et al.  The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[120]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[121]  T Greenhalgh,et al.  Commentary: Meta-analysis is a blunt and potentially misleading instrument for analysing models of service delivery. , 1998, BMJ.

[122]  Gail M. Williams,et al.  Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Child Psychiatric Morbidity: A Longitudinal Study , 1998, Pediatrics.

[123]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[124]  C. J. Armstrong,et al.  Writing abstracts for online databases: results of an investigation of database producers’ guidelines , 1998 .

[125]  Deborah J. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[126]  J. Popay,et al.  Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[127]  R. MacCoun,et al.  Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[128]  M J Campbell,et al.  Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review , 1998, BMJ.

[129]  Writing to authors of systematic reviews elicited further data in 17% of cases , 1998, BMJ.

[130]  George Davey Smith,et al.  meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies , 1998 .

[131]  E. McCrum,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice , 1998, BMJ.

[132]  David R. Jones,et al.  An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment , 1999, BMJ.

[133]  S. Oliver,et al.  Discrepancies in findings from effectiveness reviews: the case of health promotion for older people in accident and injury prevention , 1999 .

[134]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. , 1999, BMJ.

[135]  Geraldine Macdonald,et al.  Evidence-Based Social Care: Wheels off the Runway? , 1999 .

[136]  C. Seale Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[137]  Smoke alarm installation and function in inner London council housing , 1999, Archives of disease in childhood.

[138]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[139]  Carol Hirschon Weiss,et al.  The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy , 1999 .

[140]  I. Olkin,et al.  Estimating time to conduct a meta-analysis from number of citations retrieved. , 1999, JAMA.

[141]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  Commentary: Generalisability and validity in qualitative research , 1999 .

[142]  J. Sterne,et al.  Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[143]  N. Mays,et al.  Assessing quality in qualitative research , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[144]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[145]  W. Walker Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector , 2000 .

[146]  M. Dorgan,et al.  Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[147]  J Lomas,et al.  Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. , 2000, Health affairs.

[148]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[149]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[150]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  The Returns to Education: A Review of Evidence, Issues and Deficiencies in the Literature , 2000 .

[151]  L. Yardley Dilemmas in qualitative health research , 2000 .

[152]  M. McDonagh,et al.  Systematic review of water fluoridation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[153]  P. Briss,et al.  Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[154]  Patricia Dolan Mullen,et al.  Developing an Evidence-Based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods , 2000 .

[155]  H. E. Velasco-Mondragón,et al.  [Cross-sectional surveys]. , 2000, Salud publica de Mexico.

[156]  E. Waters,et al.  Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[157]  Di McNeish,et al.  What Works?: Making Connections: Linking Research and Practice , 2000 .

[158]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Substitution and Dropout Bias in Social Experiments: A Study of an Influential Social Experiment , 2000 .

[159]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research , 2000 .

[160]  Ann Oakley,et al.  Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences , 2001 .

[161]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Publication and related biases: a review , 2000 .

[162]  S H Woolf Taking critical appraisal to extremes. The need for balance in the evaluation of evidence. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[163]  David R. Jones,et al.  Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[164]  H Thomson,et al.  Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[165]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Young people and physical activity: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators , 2001 .

[166]  Ransom A. Myers,et al.  What is the carrying capacity for fish in the ocean? A meta-analysis of population dynamics of North Atlantic cod , 2001 .

[167]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[168]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Housing interventions and health: a systematic review of intervention studies , 2001 .

[169]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care , 2001 .

[170]  How To Find Information: Social Sciences , 2001 .

[171]  T. Peters,et al.  Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[172]  William Solesbury,et al.  Evidence Based Policy: Whence it Came and Where it’s Going , 2001 .

[173]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[174]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[175]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. , 2001, BMJ.

[176]  A. Amos,et al.  Nobody home? Issues of respondent recruitment in areas of deprivation , 2001 .

[177]  Steff Lewis,et al.  Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[178]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context: Second Edition , 2008 .

[179]  D. Mohan,et al.  Global road safety and the contribution of big business , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[180]  Casting and drawing lots: a time honoured way of dealing with uncertainty and ensuring fairness , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[181]  I. Roberts,et al.  Evidence based road safety: the Driving Standards Agency's schools programme , 2001, The Lancet.

[182]  Phil Edwards,et al.  Identifying controlled evaluation studies of road safety interventions: Searching for needles in a haystack , 2001 .

[183]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Narrative Impressions of Literature: The Availability Bias and the Corrective Properties of Meta-Analytic Approaches , 2001 .

[184]  D Elbourne,et al.  Collaboration with the Campbell collaboration. EPPI centre reviews will aim to disseminate systematic reviews in education. , 2001, BMJ.

[185]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[186]  P Davies,et al.  The Campbell Collaboration , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[187]  S. Oliver,et al.  Using Research For Effective Health Promotion , 2001 .

[188]  S. Thacker,et al.  Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[189]  Mark Petticrew,et al.  Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[190]  S Rose,et al.  Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[191]  D. Ritchie 'Breathing Space' - Reflecting upon the realities of community partnerships and workers' beliefs about promoting health , 2001 .

[192]  David R. Jones,et al.  Methods for Exploring Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[193]  Eric Manheimer,et al.  Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility , 2002, British medical journal.

[194]  D. Rennie,et al.  Publication bias in editorial decision making. , 2002, JAMA.

[195]  A. Petrosino,et al.  "Scared Straight" and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[196]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Evidence and Policy and Naming and Shaming , 2002 .

[197]  Steve McDonald,et al.  The Contribution of Handsearching European General Health Care Journals to the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[198]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  Evidence-Based Crime Prevention , 2002 .

[199]  M. Frommer,et al.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[200]  E. Laska The use of capture-recapture methods in public health. , 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[201]  Keith R Abrams,et al.  Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence , 2002, The Lancet.

[202]  S. Cummins,et al.  “Food deserts”—evidence and assumption in health policy making , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[203]  Rowland Atkinson,et al.  Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods? An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda , 2002 .

[204]  D. Gough,et al.  School-based violence prevention programs: systematic review of secondary prevention trials. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[205]  A. Tonks,et al.  A clinical trials register for Europe , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[206]  Victor M Montori,et al.  Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines , 2002, BMC medical research methodology.

[207]  Carin M Olson,et al.  Association between time interval to publication and statistical significance. , 2002, JAMA.

[208]  David Evans,et al.  Database searches for qualitative research. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[209]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[210]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. , 2002, JAMA.

[211]  Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al.  Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[212]  L. Hedges,et al.  A Brief History of Research Synthesis , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[213]  Peter Jüni,et al.  Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. , 2002, JAMA.

[214]  T. Lancaster,et al.  Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[215]  D. Gough,et al.  Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate , 2002, Social Policy and Society.

[216]  Jenny Strong,et al.  Expert review of an approach to functional capacity evaluation. , 2002, Work.

[217]  A. Sowden,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions based on a stages-of-change approach to promote individual behaviour change. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[218]  C. Pope,et al.  Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[219]  Ann Oakley,et al.  Social Science and Evidence-based Everything: The case of education , 2002 .

[220]  R. Wears,et al.  Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. , 2002, JAMA.

[221]  S. Hawker,et al.  Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[222]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic review , 2002, Medical teacher.

[223]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[224]  Searching for studies of the outcomes of education: a bibliometric study , 2003 .

[225]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research , 2003 .

[226]  H Roberts,et al.  Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[227]  L. Gennetian,et al.  Staying Single: The Effects of Welfare Reform Policies on Marriage and Cohabitation , 2003 .

[228]  Laurie M. Anderson,et al.  The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[229]  Lucy Dillon,et al.  Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. , 2003 .

[230]  F. Song,et al.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[231]  Lesley A Stewart,et al.  PUBLICATION BIAS AND META-ANALYSES , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[232]  J Chilcott,et al.  The role of modelling in prioritising and planning clinical trials. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[233]  Brian J. Taylor,et al.  Hidden Gems: Systematically Searching Electronic Databases for Research Publications for Social Work and Social Care , 2003 .

[234]  P. Vitaliano,et al.  Is caregiving hazardous to one's physical health? A meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[235]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale , 2003 .

[236]  Geoffrey Nelson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Research on Preschool Prevention Programs for Children. , 2003 .

[237]  M. Mugford,et al.  Effectiveness of out-of-home day care for disadvantaged families: randomised controlled trial , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[238]  J. Mackenbach Tackling inequalities in health: the need for building a systematic evidence base , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[239]  John Lavis,et al.  Measuring the impact of health research , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[240]  Mark Petticrew,et al.  Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[241]  Robert Boruch,et al.  Populating an International Web-Based Randomized Trials Register in the Social, Behavioral, Criminological, and Education Sciences , 2003 .

[242]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[243]  T. Schermer,et al.  Evidence-based health economics: from effectiveness to efficiency in systematic review. , 2003 .

[244]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for English Language Learners. A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 2003 .

[245]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[246]  J. A. Smith,et al.  The problem of appraising qualitative research , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[247]  Anthony J Culyer,et al.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[248]  S. Chapman,et al.  Advocacy for public health: a primer , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[249]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Narrative Research in Health and Illness , 2004 .

[250]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Evaluating the health effects of social interventions , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[251]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[252]  T. Sheldon,et al.  Mentoring to reduce antisocial behaviour in childhood , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[253]  C. Windle The shift to research synthesis , 2004, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[254]  H Roberts,et al.  Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[255]  A. Bhuiya,et al.  Application of the capture-recapture method for estimating number of mobile male sex workers in a port city of Bangladesh. , 2004, Journal of health, population, and nutrition.

[256]  Richard Doll,et al.  Mortality in relation to smoking: 22 years' observations on female British doctors. , 1980, British medical journal.

[257]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, spread and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation , 2004 .

[258]  L. Leibovici,et al.  Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[259]  Sally Baldwin,et al.  Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policy , 2004 .

[260]  Rachel Jenkins,et al.  Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[261]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Moving from description to action: challenges in researching socio-economic inequalities in health. , 2004, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[262]  A. Gagnon,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF QUESTIONNAIRES MEASURING THE HEALTH OF RESETTLING REFUGEE WOMEN , 2004, Health care for women international.

[263]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  Assessing the quality of research , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[264]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[265]  Tina Miller,et al.  Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[266]  Carol Brayne,et al.  Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation , 2004, BMC public health.

[267]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[268]  K. Cox,et al.  A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[269]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Comparison of reporting of ethnicity in US and European randomised controlled trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[270]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[271]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[272]  J. Gray,et al.  Evidence based policy making , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[273]  Derrick A Bennett,et al.  Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[274]  H. Graham,et al.  Resilient Young Mothering: Social Inequalities, Late Modernity and the ‘Problem’ of ‘Teenage’ Motherhood , 2005 .

[275]  Ruth Gilbert,et al.  Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[276]  Clare Bambra,et al.  Does 'welfare-to-work' work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK's welfare-to-work programmes for people with a disability or chronic illness. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[277]  D Acheson,et al.  Independent inquiry into inequalities in health , 2005 .

[278]  J Garcia,et al.  Young people and healthy eating: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. , 2001, Health education research.

[279]  Sarah Frost,et al.  What Works for Children , 2006 .

[280]  Jonathon D. Crystal,et al.  The psychology of time , 2007, Behavioural Processes.