Integrated harvesting for conventional log and energy wood assortments: a case study in a pine plantation in Western Australia

Biomass or energy wood harvesting can be integrated with conventional log harvesting (saw log or pulpwood production) to allow more cost-effective energy wood supply. The efficiency of an integrated energy wood harvesting system was evaluated and compared with conventional log harvesting in a 32-year-old Pinus radiata plantation (radiata pine) located in south-west Western Australia. The harvesting system consisted of a harvester and a forwarder. The study included two treatments: a conventional log-harvesting operation where merchantable sawlogs and pulp logs were produced at the stump by the harvester and extracted by the forwarder; and an integrated energy wood operation where the harvester produced sawlogs, pulp logs and energy wood at the stump that were extracted by the forwarder. In the integrated energy wood harvesting plot, 37 m3 ha−1 of energy wood was extracted in addition to the sawlog and pulp log volumes. Extracting the additional energy wood reduced the productivity of the forwarder and increased the cost of extraction (AU$2.7 m−3) compared with the control plot (AU$2.2 m−3). Harvesting system cost was not significantly impacted, with a cost of AU$3.18 m−3 in the control plot and AU$3.23 m−3 in the integrated energy wood harvesting plot. Diameter at breast height (DBH) was a significant factor influencing the working time of the harvester, whereas load volume, extraction distance and extraction type (sawlog, pulp logs, and pulp log/energy wood) significantly impacted forwarding time. Increasing DBH resulted in longer working cycles for the harvester. Heavier loads and longer forwarding distances increased forwarding cycle time, while extracting sawlogs was least expensive and energy wood extraction was the most expensive. The marginal cost of the energy wood was approximately AU$10.2 m−3 (AU$7.0 extraction and AU$3.2 harvesting), which is about double the cost of the sawlogs. Additional material recovered in the integrated energy wood plot resulted in less residual residues on the plot (103.2 green metric tonnes per hectare [GMt ha−1]) than the control plot (144.2 GMt ha−1).

[1]  Rien Visser,et al.  Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling-processing , 2012, Journal of Forest Research.

[2]  Rodney J Davis,et al.  Sustainable biomass supply chain for the Mallee woody crop industry , 2012 .

[3]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Developing Sustainability Indicators for Woody Biomass Harvesting in the United States , 2011 .

[4]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland , 2011 .

[5]  Pekka Tamminen,et al.  Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: Long-term impact on tree growth , 2011 .

[6]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Physical characterization of commercial woodchips on the Italian energy market , 2011 .

[7]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations , 2010 .

[8]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Compression Processing and Load Compression of Young Scots Pine and Birch Trees in Thinnings for Bioenergy , 2010 .

[9]  Borja Velázquez-Martí,et al.  Evaluation of two harvesting systems for the supply of wood-chips in Norway spruce forests affected by bark beetles , 2007 .

[10]  Richard J. Harper,et al.  Estimation of woody biomass production from a short-rotation bio-energy system in semi-arid Australia , 2007 .

[11]  J. Bartle,et al.  Scale of biomass production from new woody crops for salinity control in dryland agriculture in Australia. , 2007 .

[12]  R. J. Raison.  Opportunities and impediments to the expansion of forest bioenergy in Australia , 2006 .

[13]  H. Mckay,et al.  Environmental, economic, social and political drivers for increasing use of woodfuel as a renewable resource in Britain. , 2006 .

[14]  Rolf Björheden,et al.  Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden , 2006 .

[15]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Performance of a logging residue bundler in the temperate forests of France , 2004 .

[16]  P. J. Smethurst,et al.  Distribution of carbon and nutrients and fluxes of mineral nitrogen after clear-felling a Pinus radiata plantation , 1990 .

[17]  Mohammad Reza Ghaffariyan,et al.  Remaining slash in different harvesting operation sites in Australian plantations. , 2013 .

[18]  B. Talbot,et al.  Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies , 2012 .

[19]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies, COST Action FP-0902, WG 2 Operations research and measurement methodologies , 2012 .

[20]  J. Bartle,et al.  Bioenergy in Australia: Status and opportunities , 2012 .

[21]  M. R. Ghaffariyan,et al.  Review of European biomass harvesting technologies. , 2010 .

[22]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system , 2006 .

[23]  J. Leech,et al.  Logging residue assessment by line intersect sampling , 1997 .

[24]  Jb Hudson,et al.  Integrated harvesting systems , 1992 .

[25]  P. Beets,et al.  Managing for long-term site productivity , 1987 .