Buried and accessible surface area control intrinsic protein flexibility.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Kauzmann. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.
[2] C. Chothia,et al. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins , 1974, Nature.
[3] C. Chothia. Structural invariants in protein folding , 1975, Nature.
[4] J. Janin,et al. Surface area of globular proteins. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.
[5] D. Teller. Accessible area, packing volumes and interaction surfaces of globular proteins , 1976, Nature.
[6] M. Levitt. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. , 1978, Biochemistry.
[7] W A Hendrickson,et al. Influence of solvent accessibility and intermolecular contacts on atomic mobilities in hemerythrins. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Cyrus Chothia,et al. The accessible surface area and stability of oligomeric proteins , 1987, Nature.
[9] A M Lesk,et al. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] P. Wolynes,et al. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.
[11] Collaborative Computational,et al. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[12] A. Lesk,et al. Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[13] P Argos,et al. The role of side-chain hydrogen bonds in the formation and stabilization of secondary structure in soluble proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[14] M. Vihinen,et al. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions , 1994, Proteins.
[15] J. Thornton,et al. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[16] C. Dobson,et al. Structural determinants of protein dynamics: analysis of 15N NMR relaxation measurements for main-chain and side-chain nuclei of hen egg white lysozyme. , 1995, Biochemistry.
[17] A G Murzin,et al. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] P. Argos,et al. Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.
[19] P Argos,et al. Correlation between side chain mobility and conformation in protein structures. , 1997, Protein engineering.
[20] R. Abseher,et al. Essential spaces defined by NMR structure ensembles and molecular dynamics simulation show significant overlap , 1998, Proteins.
[21] D. Covell,et al. Correlation between native-state hydrogen exchange and cooperative residue fluctuations from a simple model. , 1998, Biochemistry.
[22] M. Philippopoulos,et al. Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: Comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X‐ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI , 1999, Proteins.
[23] H. Dyson,et al. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[24] R. Nussinov,et al. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[25] C. Chothia,et al. The Packing Density in Proteins: Standard Radii and Volumes , 1999 .
[26] M. Karplus,et al. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] V. Uversky,et al. Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.
[28] Y. Sanejouand,et al. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.
[29] K A Dill,et al. Are proteins well-packed? , 2001, Biophysical journal.
[30] Y. Yamagata,et al. Contribution of polar groups in the interior of a protein to the conformational stability. , 2001, Biochemistry.
[31] Christopher J. Oldfield,et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[32] B. Halle,et al. Flexibility and packing in proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[33] Rafael Brüschweiler,et al. Contact model for the prediction of NMR N-H order parameters in globular proteins. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[34] George I Makhatadze,et al. Thermodynamic consequences of burial of polar and non-polar amino acid residues in the protein interior. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[35] C. A. Andersen,et al. Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility. , 2002, Structure.
[36] Karsten Suhre,et al. ElNémo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[37] Igor Polikarpov,et al. Average protein density is a molecular‐weight‐dependent function , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[38] Eran Eyal,et al. Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side‐chain conformations in proteins , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[39] M. Y. Lobanov,et al. To be folded or to be unfolded? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[40] Ruth Nussinov,et al. Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[41] P. Tompa,et al. The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[42] Miron Livny,et al. RECOORD: A recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank , 2005, Proteins.
[43] I. Bahar,et al. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[44] J. Beckmann,et al. FoldIndex©: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded , 2005 .
[45] P. Radivojac,et al. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Suppl 7:176–182 (2005) Exploiting Heterogeneous Sequence Properties Improves Prediction of Protein Disorder , 2022 .
[46] Jaime Prilusky,et al. FoldIndex copyright: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded , 2005, Bioinform..
[47] David S Wishart,et al. A simple method to predict protein flexibility using secondary chemical shifts. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[48] B. Rost,et al. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence , 2005, Proteins.
[49] Zoran Obradovic,et al. Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[50] Michail Yu. Lobanov,et al. Prediction of Amyloidogenic and Disordered Regions in Protein Chains , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[51] C. Chennubhotla,et al. Insights into equilibrium dynamics of proteins from comparison of NMR and X-ray data with computational predictions. , 2007, Structure.
[52] D. Kern,et al. Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.
[53] Emmanuel D Levy,et al. PiQSi: protein quaternary structure investigation. , 2007, Structure.
[54] P. Chacón,et al. Thorough validation of protein normal mode analysis: a comparative study with essential dynamics. , 2007, Structure.
[55] K. Henrick,et al. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[56] M. Seibert,et al. On the precision of calculated solvent-accessible surface areas. , 2007, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[57] N. S. Bogatyreva,et al. [Radius of gyration is indicator of compactness of protein structure]. , 2008, Molekuliarnaia biologiia.
[58] O. Galzitskaya,et al. More compact protein globules exhibit slower folding rates , 2007, Proteins.
[59] S. Teichmann,et al. Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes , 2008, Nature.
[60] O. V. Galzitskaya,et al. Radius of gyration as an indicator of protein structure compactness , 2008, Molecular Biology.
[61] M. Sternberg,et al. Insights into protein flexibility: The relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein–protein docking , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[62] Oxana V. Galzitskaya,et al. Coupling between Properties of the Protein Shape and the Rate of Protein Folding , 2009, PloS one.
[63] M. Gerstein,et al. Relating protein conformational changes to packing efficiency and disorder , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[64] Lukasz Kurgan,et al. On the relation between residue flexibility and local solvent accessibility in proteins , 2009, Proteins.
[65] Xin Deng,et al. PreDisorder: ab initio sequence-based prediction of protein disordered regions , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.
[66] J. Marsh,et al. Sequence determinants of compaction in intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[67] L. Reymond,et al. Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[68] D. Svergun,et al. Structure and Dynamics of Ribosomal Protein L12: An Ensemble Model Based on SAXS and NMR Relaxation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[69] E. Levy. A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.
[70] J. Marsh,et al. Structural diversity in free and bound states of intrinsically disordered protein phosphatase 1 regulators. , 2010, Structure.
[71] L. Reymond,et al. Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[72] Michael Levitt,et al. Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data , 2010, Nature.
[73] Caitlin L. Chicoine,et al. Net charge per residue modulates conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[74] Ugo Bastolla,et al. Torsional network model: normal modes in torsion angle space better correlate with conformation changes in proteins. , 2010, Physical review letters.
[75] Modesto Orozco,et al. MoDEL (Molecular Dynamics Extended Library): a database of atomistic molecular dynamics trajectories. , 2010, Structure.
[76] H. Gohlke,et al. Large‐scale comparison of protein essential dynamics from molecular dynamics simulations and coarse‐grained normal mode analyses , 2010, Proteins.
[77] O. Galzitskaya,et al. Accessible Surfaces of Beta Proteins Increase with Increasing Protein Molecular Mass More Rapidly than Those of Other Proteins , 2011, PloS one.
[78] Sarah A. Teichmann,et al. Relative Solvent Accessible Surface Area Predicts Protein Conformational Changes upon Binding , 2011, Structure.
[79] Collin M. Stultz,et al. Protein Structure along the Order–Disorder Continuum , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[80] Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al. ESpritz: accurate and fast prediction of protein disorder , 2012, Bioinform..
[81] S. Teichmann,et al. Probing the diverse landscape of protein flexibility and binding. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.
[82] K. Dill,et al. The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On , 2012, Science.
[83] Monika Fuxreiter,et al. Fuzziness: linking regulation to protein dynamics. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.
[84] Luca Mollica,et al. Towards a robust description of intrinsic protein disorder using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.
[85] G. Vriend,et al. Exploring Protein Dynamics Space: The Dynasome as the Missing Link between Protein Structure and Function , 2012, PloS one.
[86] Joseph A Marsh,et al. Ensemble modeling of protein disordered states: Experimental restraint contributions and validation , 2011, Proteins.
[87] S. Teichmann,et al. Protein Complexes Are under Evolutionary Selection to Assemble via Ordered Pathways , 2013, Cell.
[88] V. Uversky. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2014 .