Tendon Function After Replantation: Prognostic Factors and Strategies to Enhance Total Active Motion

The purpose of this study was to determine the important prognostic factors for recovery of tendon function as measured by total active movement (TAM) in patients undergoing digital replantation. More important, the authors wanted to establish which factors may be manipulated to maximize motion. A retrospective review of 48 patients (103 digital rays) who underwent replantation was performed. Average TAM for all digits was 129 deg. Zone 1 and zone 5 injuries had better TAM than injuries in zones 2, 3, and 4, which had TAM values not significantly different from one another. Avulsion injuries fared significantly worse than other mechanisms of injury. TAM values were not affected by age, type of bone fixation, number of arteries repaired, or number of digits injured. Digits with both the profundus and the superficialis tendons repaired had significantly better TAM values relative to one-tendon fingers. Similarly, fingers treated with an “early” mobilization regime also exhibited better movement. Small numbers of injured digits in some groups may have limited our ability to detect significant differences.

[1]  S. Komatsu,et al.  Successful Replantation Of A Completely Cut-off Thumb , 1968 .

[2]  Manktelow Rt,et al.  Digital replantation: a functional assessment. , 1979 .

[3]  H. Kleinert,et al.  Microvascular repair in replantation. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Ferreira,et al.  Replantation of digits: Factors influencing survival and functional results , 1994, Microsurgery.

[5]  J. May,et al.  Late Digital Replantation Failure: Pathophysiology and Risk Factors , 1998, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[6]  P. Silverman,et al.  Early protective motion in digital revascularization and replantation , 1989 .

[7]  B. Povlsen,et al.  Natural history of digital replantation: A 12‐year prospective study , 1995, Microsurgery.

[8]  J. Urbaniak To replant or not to replant? That is not the question. , 1983, Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume.

[9]  J. Boswick,et al.  Recovery of function following replantation and revascularization of amputated hand parts. , 1981, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  R. Malt,et al.  REPLANTATION SURGERY IN CHINA , 1973 .

[11]  R. Idler,et al.  Complications of replantation surgery. , 1992, Hand Clinics.

[12]  R. Beasley,et al.  Present indications and contraindications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. , 1981, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[13]  G. Lister,et al.  Replantation of digits and hands: analysis of surgical techniques and functional results in 71 patients with 86 replantations. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  D. S. Bright,et al.  Digital sensibility following replantation. , 1978, The Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  A. Nyström,et al.  Cold Intolerance is Not More Common or Disabling After Digital Replantation Than After Other Treatment of Compound Digital Injuries , 1998, Annals of plastic surgery.

[16]  L. A. Koman,et al.  The results of replantation after amputation of a single finger. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. May,et al.  Digital replantation distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint. , 1982, The Journal of hand surgery.

[18]  J. Nunley,et al.  Results after replantation and revascularization in the upper extremity in children. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.