Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: Experiment results

Acoustic enhancement of the electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOEs) was investigated by systematically varying acoustic frequency and intensity. The results demonstrated that simultaneous acoustic stimulation at frequencies around the characteristic frequency of the electrical current injection place was most effective in enhancing low-frequency EEOEs. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the enhancement was tuned and graded. The enhancement threshold tuning curves (defined as sound pressure level needed to achieve 1 dB of enhancement) resembled basilar membrane tuning at high sound pressure levels. The data suggest that the emissions were generated from a cochlear region near the electrode place, and the magnitude of the enhancement depends on the magnitude of the basilar membrane response to the acoustic stimulus.

[1]  G. Misrahy,et al.  Electrical properties of wall of endolymphatic space of the cochlea (guinea pig). , 1958, The American journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Mountain,et al.  Haircell forward and reverse transduction: Differential suppression and enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[3]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Allyn E. Hubbard,et al.  Electromechanical Processes in the Cochlea , 1983 .

[5]  A. E. Hubbard,et al.  Rapid force production in the cochlea , 1989, Hearing Research.

[6]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Application of a commercially-manufactured Doppler-shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar-membrane vibration , 1991, Hearing Research.

[7]  Y. Hosokawa,et al.  Alternating current induced otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig , 1991, Hearing Research.

[8]  David C. Mountain,et al.  Active Filtering by Hair Cells , 1986 .

[9]  A. Cody,et al.  Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: Implications for the spatial distribution of the ‘active process’ , 1992, Hearing Research.

[10]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear-microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. Mountain,et al.  Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. , 1983, Science.

[12]  Craig C. Bader,et al.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. , 1985, Science.

[13]  J. Ashmore A fast motile response in guinea‐pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: effects of the membrane filter , 1992, Journal of Neuroscience.