论文信息 - Representations Don't Need Rules: Reply to lames Garson - 字舞流文

Representations Don't Need Rules: Reply to lames Garson

Les AA. rappellent les arguments de Garson contre leur compromis connexionniste et justifient leur desir de donner une theorie des representations mentales qui refuse l'existence de regles semblables a celles d'un ordinateur pour le cerveau

Terence E Horgan | John L. Tienson | T. Horgan | John Tienson

[1] T. Horgan,et al. Representations without Rules , 1989 .

[2] J. Fodor,et al. Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work , 1990, Cognition.

[3] T. Horgan,et al. Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind , 1991 .

[4] James W. Garson,et al. No Representations without Rules: The Prospects for a Compromise Between Paradigms in Cognitive Science , 1994 .

[5] Jordan B. Pollack,et al. Recursive Distributed Representations , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[6] Géraldine Legendre,et al. Principles for an Integrated Connectionist/Symbolic Theory of Higher Cognition ; CU-CS-600-92 , 1992 .

[7] Georges Rey. An Explanatory Budget for Connectionism and Eliminativism , 1991 .

[8] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Preface to the Special Issue on Connectionist Symbol Processing , 1990 .

[9] George Berg,et al. A Connectionist Parser with Recursive Sentence Structure and Lexical Disambiguation , 1992, AAAI.

[10] P. Smolensky. THE CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE OF CONNECTIONIST MENTAL STATES: A REPLY TO FODOR AND PYLYSHYN , 2010 .

[11] T. Gelder,et al. Classical Questions, Radical Answers: Connectionism and the Structure of Mental Representations , 1991 .